User talk:Djampa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Djampa!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Djampa!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:01, 28 May 2010 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:06, 28 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Écrouves mémorial déportation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Rama (talk) 09:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 15:27, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Versailles_statue_équestre_Louis_le_Grand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antony_Synagogue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 20:24, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Créteil_mosquée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 19:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Choisy-le-Roi_Synagogue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Civa (talk) 19:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of Panorama

[edit]

Vous éprouvez, semble-t-il, un certain plaisir à supprimer des photos de Commons.

L'argument invoqué est "Freedom of Panorama"

Toutefois, la protection des oeuvres architecturales ne s'applique que pour les bâtiments récents dépassant le "seuil d'originalité", et présentant un caractère artistique certain (il est précisé sur Commons : "There is no freedom of panorama in France, neither for sculptures, nor for buildings that pass the threshold of originality. Concerning buildings, case law (CA Riom, 26 mai 1967) recognizes two criteria for originality: "a definite artistic character" (« un caractère artistique certain ») and the fact that it does not belong to a series. For instance, the architect of the Louvre Pyramid is entitled to claim copyright over representations of the Pyramid." ). S'il s'agit ici d'un bâtiment récent, présente-t-il un caractère artistique tel qu'il rentre dans la même catégorie que la pyramide du Louvre?

Cela ne concerne pas systématiquement TOUS les bâtiments récents, mais seulement une petite partie d'entre eux.

Ne feriez-vous pas un peu d'excès de zèle, l'ami?

Djampa (talk) 13:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
* File:Versailles Chantiers Accès Porte de Buc.jpg

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ash_Crow (talk) 22:00, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

[edit]

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Lorna Sakalovsky, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

 ■ MMXX  talk 15:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Candelabrum by Zahara Schatz

[edit]

I photographed the sculpture at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem. If I remember correctly, it was near a partially underground structure honoring children, away from the main building. Wmpearl (talk) 17:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Jewish children"

[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Jewish_Community_Festival_-_Bellevue_WA_-_2007_-_06.jpg&diff=72296053&oldid=30554882: absolutely no basis for presuming the children are Jewish. The people operating the booth presumably are, but in Bellevue, which is perhaps 5% Jewish, most attendees would not have been. The girl on the right looks probably Asian. I'm reverting that; if you actually have a basis for this beyond the event having been a Jewish festival, do please explain. - Jmabel ! talk 15:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your posts

[edit]

Please sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:48, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 10:31, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category Safed at two of my pictures

[edit]

Hello, i removed the category Safed from the two pictures (File:Safed BW 3.jpg‎ File:Safed BW 1.jpg‎), because they are already indirectly in this category:
Category:Ari Ashkenazi Synagogue -> Category:Synagogues in Safed -> Category:Buildings in Safed -> Category:Safed|
Pictures should not be at two positions of the same category tree. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:06, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Synagogue Sefarad

[edit]

Vu votre modif. Me suis je trompé dans la légénde ? --olevy (talk) 15:50, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements on Geocoding

[edit]

Hello Djampa, I have seen that you're working con coordinates. Please visit Commons talk:Geocoding#Building new photo loc templates to see and discuss a proposal for what a coord is based upon. Thanks, --Mattes (talk) 05:55, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Remote_views_of_Klal_building has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Yoninah (talk) 22:27, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 22:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Categories of my uploads

[edit]

Thank you very much. It is much helpful. Geagea (talk) 09:44, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome Djampa (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Rafle du Vel d'Hiv métro Bir Hakeim.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bible

[edit]

Hello Djampa, you may interested in the following files:

Geagea (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baby Penguin makes his first appearance (2667796638).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 12:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for the dedicated tireless work of categorize files related to Israel. -- Geagea (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)]][reply]

Nudity and pornography

[edit]

Please note that Commons is not censored, and that images are "nudity and pornography" is not a reason for deletion. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!

[edit]

Dear Djampa,

I want to thank you for the great work you are doing with the pictures I uploaded Commons. Thank you so much!

Best regards, Yael 14:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank You so much! Yael 14:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
Thank you so much! JHistory talk 15:14, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've told you once, but you seem to not understand... DO NOT CHANGE THE LANGUAGE. You should keep the language of the original. Name it in Hebrew, please. Wieralee (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Western Wall of the Temple Mount, Jerusalem

[edit]

Hi there! What exactly is the difference between this new category and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Western_Wall ? --Judithcomm (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the point is to make a difference between the western wall of the temple mount, and, let' s say, by exemple, the western wall of the old city, or any other western wall. If you are jewish, you know what the "Western Wall" mean but for other people, they don't know. Maybe they can understand "Wailing Wall" but not "Western Wall" Djampa (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I tend to agree with you, but my experience is that people who know what it means will overturn you. Wailing wall would be my choice, but for some reason this is not preferred by most, This would also mean that all of the photo's of the Western Wall should be moved. A lot of work ;-) --Judithcomm (talk) 18:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
i guess there is a tool to move easily all the files from one category to another?Djampa (talk) 03:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Alex_brollo was working on a bot a while ago, I think. Maybe you can ask there. But there may be more. --Judithcomm (talk) 09:50, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You can use Cat-a-lot. You just need to enable it in your preferences (section:Tools for categories). -- Geagea (talk) 09:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Please see note at File talk:ירושלים (4368778654).jpg. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:08, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Civa (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Palestinian child with portrait.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Palestinian child with portrait.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. May I ask, what is making these to photos a single gallery? There is gap of more than 12 years between them, and they are definitely not two versions of the same photo. Mbkv717 (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk categorization reversions of Willem van de Poll photographs in East Jerusalem

[edit]

re [1] and literally hundreds more. You sem to be depopulating Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll in East Jerusalem and restoring them to Category:Photographs by Willem van de Poll. I can't see any discussion of this, either around the images, or on Huldra (talk · contribs)?

What's the issue here? And why are you changing this in such a blunt and heavy-handed way? If you object to some detail of the categorization (and I know that naming issues here are politically fraught), we should fix that, not simply bulk revert. I've sorted literal tens of thousands of Van de Poll's images, I hope you're not going to start similarly bulk-reverting all of mine too! Andy Dingley (talk) 15:05, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Andy Dingley: you are correct: AFAIK every one of the 70–80+ files Djampa reverted are in East Jerusalem. Only Israel says they are in Israel, the rest of the world does not accepts this. Now Djampa have made them look as if they are in Israel. I thought this was Wikipedia, not "Israelipedia"! Andy Dingley: where can I report Djampa? Huldra (talk) 20:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it is even worse: here Djampa places Ariel in Israel....not a single country, not even the Israeli government, says that Ariel is in Israe!! Huldra (talk) 20:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category_talk:Photographs_by_Willem_van_de_Poll would seem like the most obvious. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Again, could you please take part in the dicussion on Category_talk:Photographs_by_Willem_van_de_Poll instead of making reverts like this? Huldra (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, PantoKrtor (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Old Jerusalem poster for the meeting of Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Old Jerusalem poster for the meeting of Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yann (talk) 10:38, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition of disputable country assignations

[edit]

Hi. You seem to be ignoring some gentle pings to be part of a conversation, which is your choice, though is not very helpful in a consensus-based community.

With your rename requests that assign a country assignation, there is challenge that the assignation of Israel is correct, and some would say that it is particularly problematic. The recommendation is that all disputable components are omitted, and that the naming can proceed on agreed components of a name. Whilst there is a rename criteria that allows renames based on "uploader's request" that criteria does not overrule other criteria, nor allow for specifically problematic renames.

If this request is problematic, then feel welcome to add your commentary to Commons:Village pump#Provocatively wrong file names so that we can hear your side of the conversation.

Thanks for your assistance.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:50, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Greek Chapels on Holy Sepulchre parvis of John the Baptist has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Fallaner (talk) 12:34, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Territory of Israel

[edit]

Please do not add Israel, outside the 1967 borders, in disputed territories or occupied territories like West Bank, East Jerusalem or Golan Heights. Any more addiction, i will report your addictions, as others have warned you in January. Tm (talk) 13:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pour info

[edit]

Bonsoir, on parle de vous ici : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Djampa. Guil2027 (talk) 21:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: Insults, edit warring.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


العربية  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  euskara  français  Gaeilge  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  română  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  فارسی  +/−

Category discussion warning

Category:Fake_coats_of_arms has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Watchduck (quack) 10:47, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

[edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Agony in the Garden has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Oursana (talk) 07:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Many, many thsnks!

[edit]

Dear Djampa: Thank you so very much for re-organizing my uploaded photographs. I notice there are two new categories of my photos now which, I believe, you have arranged into: "Photographs by John Hill in India" and "Photographs by John Hill in Tibet". These are neatly arranged by year of my visits. I am so grateful to you making the photos more accesssible. I had wondered if I should do something about it myself as I had uploaded more than 1000 photos - but I just haven't had the energy since I have been almost totally bedridden for more than a year now. I am so pleased that others such as yourself have taken an interest in my photos. It is so much better than hiding them away in albums and boxes where nobody ever looks at them. I hope you have found some of real interest to you and send you my very best wishes along with my thanks. Cheers, John E. Hill (talk) 01:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:חלק מהסיפור של מה שקרה בבית לפני שריפתו..JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hog Farm (talk) 21:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Rabban Shimon bar Yochai has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


DGtal (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andorra is De Facto Schengen

[edit]

Andorra needs changing to being the same as Monaco, San Marino and Vatican City. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_the_Schengen_Area.svg It says it here. https://andorraguides.com/visa/schengen/ 81.101.7.190 13:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 10:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

duplicate categories

[edit]

Hi, you created both Category:Rabbi Pinhas street, Jaffa and Category:Rabbi Pinhas Ben Ya'ir street, Jaffa. Is it not the same street, see also street name guide page 387? DGtal (talk) 09:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's definitely NOT the same street. these are two differents streets. 100% sure. Djampa (talk) 11:25, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Birte Fritsch McLeod Ganj (97).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Whpq (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]