User talk:Gamsbart
File:Pietro_Lanfranchi_(195).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
RE RILLKE Questions? 14:25, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Bilder von Flickr hochladen
[edit]Bitte zum Hochladen von Flickr-Bildern auch die passende Uploadmaske benutzen. Damit wird eine Lizenzüberprüfung aktiviert die ein späteres Löschen verhindern kann. --Denniss (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ich lade die flickr-Bilder immer hier hoch: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang=defromflickr
- Was meinst du konkret? --Gamsbart (talk) 16:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Es fehlt die {{Flickrreview}} Vorlage. Ein Bot prüft dann die Lizenz. Das wird als notwendig erachtet, da man auf Flickr die Lizenzen ändern kann und nur durch den Review mit dem Bot-Skript nachweisbar wird, dass die Bilder auf Flickr zum Zeitpunkt des Uploads unter der freien Lizenz standen. Ist also zur Sicherheit falls ein Flickr-Benutzer es sich mal anders überlegt. Mit http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/flinfo.php kannst du dir zudem viel Arbeit sparen, Beispiel http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/flinfo.php?id=4493990187&repo=flickr&user_lang=de. Wobei ich dich auf keinen Fall davon abhalten möchte deine sehr guten Dateibeschreibungen mit hilfreicher Verlinkung beizubehalten ;) mfg, --Martin H. (talk) 16:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, danke für die Aufklärung. Wäre also sinnvoll, wenn die Standardvorlage für flickr-Bilder von Haus aus die Vorlage {{tl|flickrreview}} einfügen würde, denn so machen das wohl viele falsch.--Gamsbart (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob es sich nicht nur um einen temporären Skriptfehler handelt. Oder ob du das Upload-Form anders als vorgesehen verwendest, ich glaube du fügst die {{Cc-by-sa-2.0}} Vorlage direkt ein, vorgesehen ist aber, sie über das Drop-Down-Menue auszuwählen. --Martin H. (talk) 02:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, danke für die Aufklärung. Wäre also sinnvoll, wenn die Standardvorlage für flickr-Bilder von Haus aus die Vorlage {{tl|flickrreview}} einfügen würde, denn so machen das wohl viele falsch.--Gamsbart (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Es fehlt die {{Flickrreview}} Vorlage. Ein Bot prüft dann die Lizenz. Das wird als notwendig erachtet, da man auf Flickr die Lizenzen ändern kann und nur durch den Review mit dem Bot-Skript nachweisbar wird, dass die Bilder auf Flickr zum Zeitpunkt des Uploads unter der freien Lizenz standen. Ist also zur Sicherheit falls ein Flickr-Benutzer es sich mal anders überlegt. Mit http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/flinfo.php kannst du dir zudem viel Arbeit sparen, Beispiel http://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/flinfo.php?id=4493990187&repo=flickr&user_lang=de. Wobei ich dich auf keinen Fall davon abhalten möchte deine sehr guten Dateibeschreibungen mit hilfreicher Verlinkung beizubehalten ;) mfg, --Martin H. (talk) 16:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Berlin (001).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ist auf Flickr ND-lizensiert, nicht zulässig auf Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
File:Military_recruitment-Bundeswehr_(CeBIT_2005).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.184.136.134 09:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Nicolaes Tulp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Friedrich K. (talk) 20:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Nicolaes Tulp.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Friedrich K. (talk) 22:21, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Erich von Gündell (1854-1924).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 16:10, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Robert Stein 2012.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Stein 2012.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robert Stein 2012.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martina talk 16:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Delete photos of these blabla-cc-guys from the German pirate party!--Gamsbart (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Robert Stein 2011.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Stein 2011.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robert Stein 2011.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Martina talk 17:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete photos of these blabla-cc-guys from the German pirate party!--01:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
File:KdoStratAufkl Wappen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnar.offel (talk) 23:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Henrietta Green.jpeg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Henrietta Green.jpeg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
—howcheng {chat} 02:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Logo Partido Pirata de Chile.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Diego Grez return fire 19:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
File:GebMusKorps.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |