User talk:Ginkgo2g
-- 06:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Halenbrücke1 004.jpg was uncategorized on 1 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Halen 022.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Halen 002.jpg was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Halen 020.JPG was uncategorized on 2 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Dorfbrunnen Mattstetten3.jpg was uncategorized on 5 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Dorfbrunnen Mattstetten5.jpg was uncategorized on 5 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Lichtspiel-Kinemathek.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Gewerkschaft.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Ginkgo2g,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:00, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Ginkgo2g, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 06:14, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:19, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
WLM Barnstar
[edit]
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Schöne Bilder der Kirche von Kirchlindach Aarp65 (talk) 12:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Ginkgo2g, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Bildserie Halenbrücke, Aufnahmedatum
[edit]Hallo Ginkgo2g,
bitte beachte, dass Aufnahmedatum nicht gleich Hochladedatum ist. Diese ganze Serie scheint von 1993 zu sein. -- Хрюша ?? 23:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Danke für den Hinweis. Das sind Scans von Papierbildern und das genaue Aufnahmedatum kann ich nur sicher bei den Eröffnungsbildern bestimmen.--Ginkgo2g (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Autopatrol given
[edit]Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 00:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Ginkgo2g, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Ginkgo2g⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Ginkgo2g,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Für die tollen Bremgarten-Fotos! Aarp65 (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC) |
Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition
[edit]
Liebe/r Teilnehmer/in des Wettbewerbs Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014, Herzlichen Dank dass du zu Wiki4Alps beigetragen und deine Bilder mit der ganzen Welt geteilt hast. Im Rahmen des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs sind über 2500 Bilder von Kulturgütern in alpinen Regionen auf Wikimedia Commons geladen worden. Und die Jury ist daran, diese Bilder zu bewerten. Wir kommen so bald wie möglich wieder auf Dich zu, um die Gewinner bekannt zu geben. Auf der Wettbewerbsseite http://wiki4alps.ch findet ihr alle notwendigen Informationen, oder ihr könnt euch auch gerne an info@wikimedia.ch wenden. Mit den besten Grüssen, Das Organisationskomittee |
Cher participant-e au concours WLM CH 2014, Nous vous remercions de votre contribution à Wiki4Alps, et de partager vos photos avec le monde entier! Le concours a réuni plus de 2500 photos du patrimoine culturel des Alpes et le jury a commencé l'évaluation. Nous reviendrons bientôt pour annoncer les gagnants. Vous trouverez sur le site web du concours http://wiki4alps.ch ou envoyez un e-mail à info@wikimedia.ch. Avec nos salutations les meilleures, le comité d'organisation. |
Dear participants to the WLM CH contest 2014, Thank you for having contributed to Wiki4Alps and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! The contest gathered more than 2,500 pictures of cultural heritage objects of the Alps and the jury is currently evaluating them. We will come back soon to announce the winners. You will find the contest's website http://wiki4alps.ch necessary information there or you may write to us using the following address: info@wikimedia.ch. With our warmest regards, The organising committee |
Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH 2014 Grazie per aver contribuito a Wiki4Alps e per aver condiviso le tue fotografie con tutto il mondo! Il concorso ha collezionato più di 2.500 fotografie del patrimonio culturale delle Alpi e la giuria ha cominciato la valutazione. Presto saranno noti i vincitori. Per ulteriori informazioni si prega di visitare il sito web http://wiki4alps.ch o potete scrivere a info@wikimedia.ch. Con i nostri migliori saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore |
Winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Wiki4Alps edition
[edit]
Liebe Teilnehmerin/Lieber Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Monuments CH Gerne bedanken wir uns hiermit noch einmal für deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb WLM. Die Liste der Gewinner kann nun auf unserer Website sowie auch auf Wikimedia Commons eingesehen werden. Wir gratulieren den Gewinnerinnen und Gewinnern, die wir persönlich kontaktieren werden, ganz herzlich. Der Verein Wikimedia CH trifft gerade die Vorbereitungen für Wiki Loves Earth 2015, ein Fotowettbewerb rund um das Thema Natur und Nationalparks. Dieser neue Fotowettbewerb wird bereits am 1.Mai 2015 starten. Wir freuen uns sehr, wenn ihr wieder mit dabei seid! Mit besten Grüssen, Das Organisationsteam |
Cher/chère participant(e) au concours Wiki Loves Monuments CH, La liste des gagnants est disponible sur le site ainsi que sur son pendant Wikimedia Commons! Nos félicitations aux vainqueurs, qui seront contactés séparément. Wikimedia CH se prépare maintenant pour Wiki Loves Earth 2015, un concours photographique consacré à la nature et aux parcs, qui débutera le 1er mai prochain et auquel nous vous invitons à participer! Meilleurs messages, Le Comité d’organisation |
Dear Wiki Loves Monuments CH participant, We would like to inform you that the list of winners has been published on our website as well as on Wikimedia Commons - our congratulations to the winners, who will be contacted individually. Wikimedia CH is now gearing up for Wiki Loves Earth 2015, a photo contest dedicated to the nature and to parks. This new contest will start on May 1st, 2015: feel free to join! With our best regards, The organization's committee |
Gentile partecipante a Wiki Loves Monuments CH Vogliamo informarti che la lista dei vincitori é stata pubblicata sul nostro sito come anche su Wikimedia Commons - le nostre congratulazioni ai vincitori, che saranno contattati individualmente. Wikimedia CH sta ora organizzando u nuovo concorso per Wiki Loves Earth 2015 dedicato alla natura e ai parchi. Questo concorso inizierà l'1 maggio 2015: ci auguriamo di avervi tra i nostri concorrenti! Saluti, Il Comitato Organizzatore |
Eifach so!
[edit]Hallo Ginkgo, schon mehrfach sind mir deine Bilder positiv aufgefallen, so jüngst dieses Da wir ja in ähnlicher Umgebung aktiv sind, freue ich mich immer wieder über Bilder von dir – weiterhin Gut Licht! --Хрюша Chriusha?? 16:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- Danke für die Blumen Chriusha, ich gebe dir das Kompliment gerne zurück. Zur Zeit sind wir ja heftig am Hochladen, dabei versuche ich möglichst treffende Kategorien auszuwählen.--Ginkgo2g (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Ginkgo2g,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
[edit]Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.
Thank you!
Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey
[edit]Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.
If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
[edit]Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.
Bitte Urheberrecht beachten
[edit]In der Schweiz fallen Auffnahmen von Kircheninnenräumen nicht unter die Panoramafreiheit. Alle Innenaufnahmen Ökumenisches Zentrum (Ittigen) auf dennen ein Kunstwerk den Bildmittelpunkt bildet müssen also gelöscht werden. Weil eine Freigabe des Künstler erfordelkich wäre. Die Glasfenster gehen alle ganz sicher nicht. Bitte stell selber einen Schnelllöschantrag und führe die auf de: in Wikipedia:Countdown zur Gemeinfreiheit auf. --Bobo11 (talk) 06:33, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Danke für den Hinweis. --Ginkgo2g (talk) 07:50, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Bitte nicht so, sondern gesamelt unter dem Namen des Urhebers des Kunstwerkes. Du kennst den Künstername ja, also bitte mit bisschen Infos ablegen (Du erleichtest der abarbeitenden Person die Arbeit). Also wenn der schon gestoben ist kann er schon in denn endsprechende Jahresabschnitt eingreiht werden. Der Abschnitt "Offene Fälle" sind nur für noch Lebende Urheber, aber genau da sollte man sich um einer Freigabe bemühen. Aber auch da, bitte mit Namen. --Bobo11 (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Siehe User_talk:Martin_Sg.#Recherche_abgeschlossen:_Innenaufnahmen_von_Kirchen_sind_zulässig. --Martin Sg. (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ärgerlich für mich, aber danke, mir fällt ein Stein vom Herz. Ich möchte gerne die bisherigen Aktionen rückgängig machen, was meinst du?--Ginkgo2g (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Leider irrt sich Martin, Bobo11 hat recht und es war korrekt, dass du diese Löschanträge gestellt hast, siehe auch meinen Hinweis dazu hier. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:21, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
- Ärgerlich für mich, aber danke, mir fällt ein Stein vom Herz. Ich möchte gerne die bisherigen Aktionen rückgängig machen, was meinst du?--Ginkgo2g (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Siehe User_talk:Martin_Sg.#Recherche_abgeschlossen:_Innenaufnahmen_von_Kirchen_sind_zulässig. --Martin Sg. (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Bitte nicht so, sondern gesamelt unter dem Namen des Urhebers des Kunstwerkes. Du kennst den Künstername ja, also bitte mit bisschen Infos ablegen (Du erleichtest der abarbeitenden Person die Arbeit). Also wenn der schon gestoben ist kann er schon in denn endsprechende Jahresabschnitt eingreiht werden. Der Abschnitt "Offene Fälle" sind nur für noch Lebende Urheber, aber genau da sollte man sich um einer Freigabe bemühen. Aber auch da, bitte mit Namen. --Bobo11 (talk) 15:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Danke Gestumblindi Nun, das hat für mich weitere Konsequenzen. Ich muss weiter 25 Bilddateien aus Kircheninnenräumen liquidieren.--Ginkgo2g (talk) 09:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Innenräume (ganz allgemein Aussage, gilt jetzt nicht nur in Kirchen) geht schon, nur darf dann kein noch geschutzes Kunstwerk das Bild dominieren. Heist also alles was noch geschütz ist, muss noch als de:Beiwerk gelten können. Wann diese Grauzohne in die eine oder andre Richtung verlassen wird, kann und will dir hier niemand sagen wollen (sicher bist du nur mit Gerichtsurteil). Wenn allerdings nichts schützwenswertes zu sehen ist gehen alle Innenaufnahmen (die nicht einen intimen Lebensbereich verletzten versteht sich). Weil dann reicht eben die Zustimmung des Besitzers, weil wo nichts ist kann auch nichts geschütz sein. Und dann müsem ja von dir als Fotograf auch keine Urheberechte beachtet werden. Aber eben gilt das auch den anderen Weg, wenn ganz klar etwas geschutzes das Bidl dominioert (und das ist bei Glasfensteraufnamen der Fall), kann man sich in der Schweiz in Inneräume (die keine Verkehrsfunktion erfüllen), eben auf keine Ausnahmeregel wie die Panoramafreiheit berufen. Die Panoramafreitheit ist nur draussen bei festinstalierten Kunstwerken klar gegeben, wobei das Kunstwerk von öffentlich zugänglichen Grund aus gemacht sein muss (normale Ansicht). Wobei es da eben in den Komentaren Tendentzen gibt, diese Aunahme auf Verkehrswege auszudehnen, also auch Aufnahmen von Brücken oder eben auch Kunst in Fussgängerunterführungen usw. unter Panoramafreiheit fallen. Wenn man sich auf diese Komantare beruft, befindet man aber schon in der Grauzohne. Wie weit du dich in solche Grauzohnen wagst, muss du selber entschieden.--Bobo11 (talk) 21:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Vmtl. gehts um copyvio als wirklichen Löschgrund? Martin Sg. (talk) 17:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- Steht ja bei den anderen Löschanträgen. Von mir herzlichen Dank an dich, Ginkgo2g, dass du dich um's "Aufräumen" dieser natürlich von dir in bester Absicht hochgeladenen Fotos kümmerst! Noch optimaler wäre es gewesen, die Löschanträge zu gruppieren (sind dann leichter abzuarbeiten als lauter einzelne Anträge), das geht am einfachsten mit dem Tool VisualFileChange, das ich sehr empfehle, wenn viele Bilder aus einer Kategorie zum Löschen beantragt werden sollen. Aber es geht so schon auch. Ich hoffe, dass dich dieser "Rückschlag" nicht entmutigt, du hast da ja viel Aufwand reingesteckt - das Urheberrecht kann schon eine verflixte Sache sein, vor allem, wenn es widersprüchliche Interpretationen gibt! Gestumblindi (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Chiesa Madonna degli Emigrati, Bern (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:43, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Beschreibung zur Mauritiuskirche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 04:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Thomaskirche Liebef. (13).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Thomaskirche Liebef. (17).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Marien Bern (11).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland
[edit]Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.
If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.
If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Guthirt innen (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 16:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Bruder Klaus Bern 02.jpg
- File:Bruder Klaus Bern 03.jpg
- File:Bruder Klaus Bern 04.jpg
- File:Bruder Klaus Bern 05.jpg
Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
File:St.Josef Köniz (13).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kath. Kirche Moutier (5).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kath. Kirche Lyss (5).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)