User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive8

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zakłady Kronospan w Mielcu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 12:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zakłady Kronospan w Mielcu 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 12:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments White balance maybe a bit too yellowish (cf sky color) but ok for QI. --NorbertNagel 15:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dwór w Dzikowcu, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 11:17, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pstrążna, układ przestrzenny, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Here perspectives are ok but the image is a bit tilted on left IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:28, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 10:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC) Support I was thinking a bit more but ok --Christian Ferrer 15:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 26.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Tarnobrzeg, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP, 26.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Główna Street in Bardo, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:33, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Główna Street in Bardo, view from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Główna Street in Bardo, view from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Główna Street in Bardo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Anne in Przyłęk, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Market Square in Lądek-Zdrój, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Tarnów, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Tarnów, view from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Usefull --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic center of Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Zwiastowania NMP w Bardzie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 11:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 11:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 12:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół młyna wodnego w Byczeniu, 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add a descr. in English and a geotag. --Cayambe 11:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 2, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 11:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 2, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 3, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 6, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 17:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 7, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 9, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 17:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
USB hand microphones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The illustration is good - it is of high quality and unlike other similar illustrations, shows the USB plug as well as the device. However the description needs some work - who was the manufacturer, what model etc. Once this has been done, the image should qualify as a VI. -- Martinvl (talk) 09:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

  Unfortunately, the microphone does not have such information. This is not a well-known producer, but no name. I added information about this in the description of the image.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:53, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

  According to the translation given by The Google Polish to English translation webpage the English and Polish texts do not quite match. May I suggest that the English text is "USB Microphone - manufacturer and model number unknown". Since there is no manufacturer, it might be appropriate if you quote the length of the microphone. Suggested text is "USB Microphone, X mm in length - manufacturer and model number unknown". Martinvl (talk) 20:19, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

   Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support It image is of good quality, it is a good representation of the subject and is properly documented. -- Martinvl (talk) 12:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dominican monastery in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Municipal cemetery in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from main entry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:05, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gołębia Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gołębia Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 10:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Grunwaldzka Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Kościuszki Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Kościuszki Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny, spichrz, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:53, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Kościuszki Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 11:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Kościuszki Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Kościuszki Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Kościuszki Street in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 14:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
7 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Droga w Boguszynie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 23:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Chata Cyborga w Bielicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 23:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower in Ząbkowice Śląskie, evening view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:12, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chata Cyborga in Bielice, view from SSW in 2005.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment What is special about this guest house? The Description does not tell me anything - it not even identify which of 14 difference towns called en:Bielice hosts the guerst house. There are probably many similar guest houses all over Europe. The scope is, in my opinion, far too narrow and maybe even bordering on advertising. -- Martinvl (talk) 08:19, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  

  On the polish Wikipedia is page about this guesthouse. And before that for 15 years, was a tourist lodge, the only one in the Bialskie Mountains. If you check the category tree, you will see which Bielice is located. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Goświnowice - zakład produkcji etanolu 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Goświnowice - zakład produkcji etanolu 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, synagoga, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please, fix that dust spot (see note) --Poco a poco 18:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 22, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 29, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The rules of QI is not required to add geocoordinates to photos.--~~~~  Comment Of course it is not a must. Nevertheless, it should be a matter of course, and a service for other users. Or why do you think that you can not only QI, but in all the photos coordinates to specify? --Steindy 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 12:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 17:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 7, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chata Cyborga in Bielice, winter view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment What is special about this guest house? The Description does not tell me anything - it not even identify which of 14 difference towns called en:Bielice hosts the guerst house. There are probably many similar guest houses all over Europe. The scope is, in my opinion, far too narrow and maybe even bordering on advertising. -- Martinvl (talk) 08:22, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
  

  On the polish Wikipedia is page about this guesthouse. And before that for 15 years, was a tourist lodge, the only one in the Bialskie Mountains. If you check the category tree, you will see which Bielice is located. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:44, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
  
•  Support --Mile (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment There is a problem with the author, because in the EXIF data we easily see Mr. Krzysztof Brozyna as a author and copyright owner. Until the resolve of the problem status changed to discussed. --Halavar (talk) 14:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

  Fixed This picture was taken a borrowed camera, I forgot to change the exif data.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

• OK now. --Halavar (talk) 19:30, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:55, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
29 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Jana Chrzciciela w Nowym Gierałtowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 14:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża mieszkalna w Żelaźnie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża mieszkalna w Żelaźnie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 15:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wieża mieszkalna w Żelaźnie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:49, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 7, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 23:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC) The decapitated statue is still an issue to me. Not a QI like that Poco a poco 18:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC) DoneNow is better? --Jacek Halicki 21:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Okay, for me QI. --Steindy 17:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 5, 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Building leaning inward. Also, lots of CA on the tree. --Halavar 14:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 10:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 21:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ząbkowice Śląskie, Rynek 30, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:46, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 11, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 11:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 12, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 14, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 06:41, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 5, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
30 Market Square in Ząbkowice Śląskie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1st school building in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1st school building in Ząbkowice Śląskie, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2nd school building in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gym in Ząbkowice Śląskie, view from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Ziębice, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Ziębice, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I think for a church the term "portal" would be better than "entrance". --P e z i (talk) 18:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

   Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 09:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Lutheran church in Ziębice, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synagogue in Ziębice, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2b Grunwaldzka Street in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

I am really sorry for the confusion with the rosario chapel

but, can you confirm now, that this position is correct? Thank you. The reason was, because Google earth, maps.bing and maps.google have a differen geocoding format, so I had to convert it into decimal. During this conversion, something went wrong. Shit happens, sometimes. But now I think its correct. --Hubertl (talk) 12:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 20, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, Rynek 22, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ziębice, ratusz, 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 12, szklarnia I, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 11:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 5, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:47, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Ukoronowania NMP w Bardzie, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The rules of QI is not required to add geocoordinates to photos. --Jacek Halicki 11:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)  Comment Of course it is not a must. Nevertheless, it should be a matter of course, and a service for other users. Or why do you think that you can not only QI, but in all the photos coordinates to specify? --Steindy 17:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC) I do not know the coordinates.--Jacek Halicki 12:35, 8 January 2015 (UTC) You were completely lost when you took this photo, yet managed to identify it for WLM? Not QI anyway IMO, for a couple of minor reasons which add up. Mattbuck 17:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Fixed--Jacek Halicki 21:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC) *  Comment What have you fixed? The coordinates (not added) the other reasons, Mattbuck demanded ? It is the same picture as before!? --Hubertl 14:07, 13 January 2015 (UTC) *  Comment added Location.--Hubertl 15:03, 13 January 2015 (UTC)I changed the description of the picture yet. And your geocoding is wrong.--Jacek Halicki 09:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)*  Comment Jacek, above you said, you don´t know the coordinates. Right now, you say, they are wrong. How can you say, that they are wrong, when you don´t know the position? That makes your statement above completely unreliable. I will tell you something: the coordinates are ok, maybe 20-30 m difference!--Hubertl 15:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)I can not specify an exact location of the chapel, but I remember that it was certainly not in the middle of the forest. --Jacek Halicki 16:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC) Sorry, it was obviously a converting problem, now its ok.--Hubertl 19:39, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Good quality. Everything is perfect, --Hubertl 19:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC) --Hubertl 19:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

VI candidates

Hi. If you nominate your pictures to VI can you support pictures from other users, please? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. By "other users", you mean "you", right ? Since I'm on "Commons", I've probably assessed (not only suported) far much more pictures in QI, FP or VI than you, guy. I strongly dislike this kind of messages smelling like lessons. Best regards.--Jebulon (talk) 20:35, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zamek w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Raising the darks would become to the foreground which is very shadowy --Cccefalon 16:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 23:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zamek w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła II, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--NoRud 13:10, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it is tilted CW.--XRay 17:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --XRay 17:33, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, pl. Kościelny 5, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower house in Żelazno, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 15:45, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Kościelna Street in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
12 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 16:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your help

Thank you very much for fixing my photos.--Coekon (talk) 11:41, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support IMO best in scope. --Code (talk) 16:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
42 Market Square in Ziębice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sugar refinery in Ziębice, western part, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope. --Joydeep _Talk 16:30, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sugar refinery in Ziębice, estern part, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful. --Code (talk) 13:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality.--ArildV 11:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sala gimnastyczna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please crop the right side some pixels to avoid the small end of the branches. --Cccefalon 11:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mury obronne w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 12:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Mury obronne w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:04, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Baszta Gołębia w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:28, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. seems tilted at a glance, but it isn´t --Hubertl 16:41, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz komunalny w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:24, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz komunalny w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:24, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ząbkowice Śląskie, ul. Wrocławska 17, szkoła I, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No major issues. Good quality. Ram-Man 03:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Historic center of Radków, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 16:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew Bobola church in Radków, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 16:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Andrew Bobola church in Radków, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 16:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Radków, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 16:20, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Radków, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica cmentarna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good lighting and sharp. --Ram-Man 12:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica cmentarna w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As good as the other one. --Ram-Man 12:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sufficiant quality, even though this lens with this wide angel produces blurring in this case (see distortions left and right) --Hubertl 13:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor pallotynów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I like this composition --Hubertl 13:04, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Dorothy church in Radków, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Defensive walls in Radków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Radków, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Radków, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Grunwaldzka Street in Radków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 22:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Re:

Just voted to support them. They are great pictures.--Coekon (talk) 20:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Krzeszowie, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zespół klasztorny w Krzeszowie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Klasztor dominikanów w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMHO, the sky is very white, maybe even burned out. --C messier 19:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 00:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Better, QI for me. --C messier 10:58, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Maternusa w Sosnowej, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kronospan plant in Mielec, evening view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment We've got the same nomination here: Commons:Valued image candidates/2014 Zakłady Kronospan w Mielcu 01.jpg Halavar (talk) 12:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

• @Halavar Read here--Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

   Support OK but with the updated scope. --Halavar (talk) 13:17, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Kościelna Street in Radków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Krótka Street in Radków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Raszków, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, after some minutes with four similar images. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:13, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Stanislaus Kostka church in Ścinawka Dolna, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment I think this one is better: File:2014 Kościół Stanisława Kostki w Ścinawce Dolnej 05.JPG. We don't need bushes, especially those in the shades. --Halavar (talk) 13:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

IMO this picture is the best in this scope because it shows the church in the broader context, please reviews of other users. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

 Support, makes sense, but outside of VIC my favourite would be #9. –Be..anyone (talk) 11:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:46, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Stanislaus Kostka church in Ścinawka Dolna, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 Question, still trying to grok the rules, will there be a duel between #9 (this) and #2 (that)? –Be..anyone (talk) 07:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Ścinawka Dolna, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Tłumaczów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Tłumaczów, view from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Tłumaczów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Vincent church in Bielice, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Wieża mieszkalna w Żelaźnie 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Wieża mieszkalna w Żelaźnie 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilica of the Assumption in Krzeszów, view from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gatehouse of Krzeszów Abbey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Vincent church in Bielice, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 23:03, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Joseph church in Bolesławów, view from WSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, nominator knows how to pick his best, and one other is too small. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 15:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Schronisko Orlica w Zieleńcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nadajnik sieci komórkowych i GOPR w Zieleńcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--NoRud 11:36, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Józefa w Bolesławowie, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:23, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Międzylesiu, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:26, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kamieńcu Ząbkowickim, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica przydrożna w Starym Gierałtowie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica przydrożna w Starym Gierałtowie, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wapiennik w Starej Morawie, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:16, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marii Magdaleny w Tarnowie, 27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 16:21, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Ząbkowicach Śląskich, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I'l like to recommend to crop awy the bird (swift) at the very upper right top. --Cayambe 08:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Your story presented to the world

Jesteś sławny. odder (talk) 11:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Krzyż przydrożny w Zieleńcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 12:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ciągnik New Holland T7.270 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good Quality -- Spurzem 10:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ciągnik New Holland T7.270 (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Ciągnik New Holland TS135A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:56, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Zajazd Kukułka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:51, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mountain shelter "Śląski Dom", view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:47, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mountain shelter "Śląski Dom", view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Michael the Archangel church in Sienna, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Incorrect photo

Hi Jacek On page https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wiki_Lubi_Zabytki/opolskie/powiat_nyski/gmina_Paczków&redirect=no&useskin=monobook&oldid=41595446 the photos for monuments 627591 and 627591 are identical - both show No 5 Market Square. Maybe you could correct the image for 4 Market Square. Martinvl (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your attention, I corrected it. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:27, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church in Nowy Gierałtów, winter view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment: only two in the category, please broaden scope to Nowy Gierałtów. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

It happens that the category is only one photo, please other user opinions. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

• I have another problem. In this picture we can not see properly this church. Most of the building is hiding beneath the trees or it is covered by snow. Probably every image from this point made in the winter or summer will be not good. --Halavar (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

  I do not see the problem. Now, and this is the only picture good technically in this scope. If you are the better you will be able to start the procedure MVR. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

 Support Best in scope anyway and fine quality. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:47, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Michael the Archangel church in Sienna, view from NNE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, quarry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lime kiln in Stara Morawa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Archangel Michael in Stary Gierałtów, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roadside chapel in Stary Gierałtów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roadside chapel in Stary Gierałtów, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Łężyce, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kaczka krzyżowka w wodzie (samiec).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Jacek Halicki, the photo can be also a FP, I think. --Brateevsky 11:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Schronisko Na Szczelińcu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, even though the tree is crop a little bit. --Brateevsky 11:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Gimnazjum nr 1 w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, stare miasto 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 09:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Park w Tarnowie, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:57, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Schronisko Na Iglicznej 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments small CAs top right (see note) end the top of the tower is leaning but the rest is straight so maybe it is the reality --Christian Ferrer 15:30, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 15:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Support always a bit, I will say ok --Christian Ferrer 19:51, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Polanica-Zdrój, fontanna w parku zdrojowym 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Mary Magdalene in Łężyce, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Kamienica, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:27, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church in Kamienica, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Defensive walls in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:31, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrocławska Gate in Paczków, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ząbkowicka Gate In Paczków, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kłodzka Gate In Paczków, wiev from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 12:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
5 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Not a good candidate. There are 2 tenement houses, and there should be only one. --Halavar (talk) 12:46, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support OK now. P.S. Na przyszłość polecam załatwić taką sytuację w inny sposób. Poprzednie zdjęcie było dobre i na pewno by się komuś przydało. Wystarczyło stworzyć pracę pochodną i załadować ją jako nowy plik. I wtedy nazwa pliku byłaby zgodna z tym co przedstawia zdjęcie, a tak teraz nie jest... --Halavar (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:44, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:21, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:35, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Schronisko Na Iglicznej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szczeliniec Wielki, tablica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 14:48, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 10.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Bardo, most gotycki, 10.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
9 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
16 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:34, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, best POV. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:07, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, promenada nad Nysą Kłodzką.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 13:37, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most pieszy przy ul. Malczewskiego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
New Holland TS135A.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
20 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:42, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Maybe I've added "facade" or "exterior" in the scope, but  Support best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:43, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
27 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Maybe "facade" or "exterior" could give a better scope, but  Support as best in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
28 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support, but unsure about the crop, more, less? –Be..anyone (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:48, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Międzylesiu, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Bgag 16:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me. --Halavar 13:31, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Two problems. See the notes. --Halavar 13:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 14:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 15:19, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 16, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:52, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
29 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:49, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
31 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
36 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
38 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 13:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, most św. Jana 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Successful posing at dawn. --Zcebeci 18:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Pensjonat 'Słoneczna' w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
39 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
40 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:37, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
44 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
48 Market Square in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:16, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Wojska Polskiego Street in Paczków.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:18, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:22, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Jerzykowicach Wielkich, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 10:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Czeska 30 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anas platyrhynchos swimming (male), side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment, ambitious scope, good. But together with this or that, what's the best? –Be..anyone (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Both images are focus problems (too small DOF). --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support, at modem speed I can't do a FPC review, and this is VIC. –Be..anyone (talk) 21:54, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I think while it is technically slightly inferior, this currently featured image is better in some aspects: a) composition/crop b) characteristic curled tailfeathers are visible c) bird is actively swimming forward instead of just drifting around. I guess that should be handled through a Most Valued Review? --El Grafo (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@El Grafo The photograph which you propose is worse sharpness, lower resolution than the back of the head is underexposed. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 09:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Nicholas and Francis Xavier church in Otmuchów, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wróbla Gate in Otmuchów, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Nyska Street in Otmuchów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Nyska Street in Otmuchów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Otmuchów Castle, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palace at the Otmuchów Castle, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 00:29, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 23:50, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, dzwonnica, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 11:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Well with casing at the Otmuchów Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Park at the Otmuchów Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. -- Palauenc05 (talk) 08:30, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Otmuchów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Market Square in Otmuchów.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Annunciation in Nysa, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows in Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, alpha and omega.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very godd quality. To differentiate it from other windows it would be worth giving it a title in scope: I suggest "alpha and omega". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I feel that the description is very short. Where is this window? Is it above the altar, the baptistmal font, one of the transcepts or is it elsewhere? Perhaps your should also explain briefly what the window depicts. -- Martinvl (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 18:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prążki moiré na zdjęciu 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, dzwonnica, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very fine view, perfect symmetry. --Dnalor 01 11:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół śś. Piotra i Pawła w Kudowie-Zdroju, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica Complex in Nysa,view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

< Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, main nave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, ul Wojska Polskiego 23 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Paczków, ul Wojska Polskiego 23 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaczki krzyżowki w wodzie (para).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI -- Spurzem 13:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kwiaty wiśni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 12:40, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kaplica Św. Trójcy w Dusznikach-Zdroju, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015 Kaczka krzyżowka w wodzie (samiec).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015 Kaczka krzyżowka w wodzie (samiec).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Radochowie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:58, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wójtówka 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wójtówka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wójtówka 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:58, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints James and Agnes Basilica in Nysa, main portals.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is nothing in the description to tell me why this image should be a Valued Image in its own right - the portal is a close-up of the SW aspect of the church. This image appears to be a close-up of part of the image right down to the man in a white shirt and blue shorts outside the left-hand door (standing in one picture and doing up his shoe laces in the other). Having said that, this is a very good image (and probably suitable for nomination as a "Quality image") - the statues are much sharper than in the image of the SW aspect and the text of the plaque relating to Pope Benedict XVI becomes readable. -- Martinvl (talk) 16:14, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support In my opinion, the image is good to be a VI. The scope is precise and the image fits in it. --Halavar (talk) 13:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower at the church of saints James and Agnes in Nysa, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower at the church of saints James and Agnes in Nysa, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Holy Cross in Nysa, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. -- Palauenc05 (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Nysa, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara church in Nysa, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I have rewritten the English version of the description and wikilinked both the Polish and English versions. I have checked and am happy with both the geo-coordinates and the scope. -- Martinvl (talk) 14:25, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. -- Palauenc05 (talk) 22:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:07, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Wójtówka, źródło Aleksandry 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Antoniego w Wójtówce 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 18:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Antoniego w Wójtówce 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Travná (Javorník), dom 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Travná (Javorník), dom 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Cmentarz przy kościele św. Katarzyny w Kudowie-Zdroju, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Pleclown 12:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Nicholas in Radochów, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara church in Nysa, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziębicka Gate in Nysa, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ziębicka Gate in Nysa, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bishops Palace in Nysa, portal from the front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption of Holy Virgin Mary in Nysa, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the assumption of Holy Virgin Mary in Nysa, view from WNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa, main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:30, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former Jesuit Monastery in Nysa, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Zamenhofa 5 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Zamenhofa 5 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dom w Lutyni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kosciół Michała Archanioła w Starym Gierałtowie, 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, wójtostwo 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:52, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Starej Łomnicy, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wodospad i jaz w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Minor overexposure on the background houses does not matter to me. --Kreuzschnabel 09:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Baranowie Sandomierskim, 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 19:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Towers of the church leans to the left. --Halavar 11:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 13:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 17:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:23, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. At the first glance, it seems distorted, but it isn´t. Therefore QI for me --Hubertl 12:25, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Lutynia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think that image leans inward. I left a note. --Halavar 17:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 20:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 20:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrocławska Gate in Nysa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support From what I see, this tower looks the same from every angle, so according to that, there is no reason to create multiple scopes - one is enough. And this one, is best in scope I think. --Halavar (talk) 13:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wrocławska Gate in Nysa, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
4 Bracka Street in Nysa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:31, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
10 Bracka Street in Nysa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
14 Bracka Street in Nysa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
15 Grodzka Street in Nysa, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Katedralny Square in Nysa, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
8 Katedralny Square in Nysa, portal with relief.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
State School of Music in Nysa, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Jadwiga Bastion in Nysa, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 15:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:29, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 13:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 015.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Jadwiga Bastion in Nysa, Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de La Fayette's plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Jadwiga Bastion in Nysa, Charles de Gaulle's plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Hi Jacek, please tell them that Charles de Gaulle died in ColoMbey, not Colobey !! ;)--Jebulon (talk) 16:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bishops manor in Nysa, view from NNE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bishops manor in Nysa, main building, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bishops manor in Nysa, main gate.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boguszów Chapel in Mielec, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lodges chapels at the Church of St. Mark the Evangelist in Mielec, first chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory at the Church of St. Mark the Evangelist in Mielec, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Bgag (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rectory at the Church of St. Mark the Evangelist in Mielec, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boguszów Chapel in Mielec, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support. --Bgag (talk) 20:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:54, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 11:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC Goog quality for me--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 11:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, stare miasto 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 14.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 14.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, stare miasto 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 09:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kolegium św. Anny 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Wałowa 3-5 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:16, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Rynek 22 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 14:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, pl. Katedralny 8 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 15:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Komendanta 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality, but crop at the top to close. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Komendanta 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Komendanta 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 14 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Plebania w Starej Łomnicy, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Lądek-Zdrój, ul. Zamenhofa 5 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Berthold Werner 18:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 23:10, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg, chancel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg, Our Lady of Dzikovia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Assumption in Tarnobrzeg, dominican monastery, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Barbara chapel in Tarnobrzeg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Dominikańska Street in Tarnobrzeg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Tarnobrzeg, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support -- Scope is appropriate - this building is as national monument, the description is appropriate and it is properly geocoded. Best in scope. -- Martinvl (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall in Tarnobrzeg, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 15:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Mickiewicza Street in Tarnobrzeg, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- ChristianFerrer 17:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
19 Mickiewicza Street in Tarnobrzeg, view from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 12:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 14 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 14 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 12 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:55, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 12 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Zespół klasztorny dominikanów 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Kreuzschnabel 18:01, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (08).jpg

File:2014 Nowy Aton, Muzeum Wojskowej Sławy (08).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

g. balaxaZe★ 14:33, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi

Hi,how are you? I nominate this [1], Can you give a look? Thanks --LivioAndronico talk 00:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 10 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 10 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, ul. Bracka 4 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, pałac biskupi 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:25, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Herzi Pinki 10:31, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 17.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:45, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kolegium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 01:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Dom Wagi Miejskiej 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:22, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, bastion św. Jadwigi 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Brama Wrocławska 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --~~~~

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Dominikańska Street in Tarnobrzeg, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:50, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Sandomierska Street in Tarnobrzeg, view from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Wayne77 (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
25 Sandomierska Street in Tarnobrzeg, portico.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support -- ChristianFerrer 17:19, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dzikovia Castle in Tarnobrzeg, sundial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:19, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:02, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
6 Bracka Street in Nysa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene church in Tarnobrzeg, view from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Mary Magdalene church in Tarnobrzeg, main entrance and memorials.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The historic granary in Tarnobrzeg, view from ESE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The historic granary in Tarnobrzeg, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The historic granary in Tarnobrzeg, Wojciech Wiącek memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Wojciech Wiacek deserved to be known. You could translate the inscription of the plate in the caption.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

 Support Perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:28, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Na Piaskach cemetery in Tarnobrzeg, chapel of the Archangel Gabriel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support best in scope --El Grafo (talk) 15:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dzikovia Castle in Tarnobrzeg, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stable with riding school of the Dzikovia Castle.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carriage house of the Dzikovia Castle, view from ENE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Wayne77 (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carriage house of the Dzikovia Castle, view from SSE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:44, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guardhouse of the Dzikovia Castle, view from NNW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Guardhouse of the Dzikovia Castle, view from SSW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarnowskich Brewery in Tarnobrzeg, gatehouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarnowskich Brewery in Tarnobrzeg, production building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarnowskich Brewery in Tarnobrzeg, office building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. --Halavar (talk) 13:54, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kolegium 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków, view from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of All Saints in Stary Paczków, view from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 22:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, former rectory.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael Archangel church in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, main portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kolegium 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kolegium 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, zespół klasztorny jezuitów, kościół 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:11, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół ewangelicki 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trinity Column in Bystrzyca Kłodzka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Wolności Square in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Doesn't show the whole building and thus doesn't fit the scope. --Code (talk) 05:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. --Code (talk) 13:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maria Śnieżna sanctuary, view from NNE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 20:51, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Nicholas church in Nowy Waliszów, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

"Exposure"

Hi Jacek,

Desolated meet you a little later.

The term "exposure" is very classic, for photography of landscapes, in English. It also corresponds to the French term.

You're doing a great job with a very good spirit, is a pleasure to work with you.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:32, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spa park in Kudowa-Zdrój, bench with the gardener.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Halavar (talk) 11:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Sempołowskiej Street Bystrzyca Kłodzka, central part, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Sempołowskiej Street Bystrzyca Kłodzka, northern part, view from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
13 Sempołowskiej Street Bystrzyca Kłodzka, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment See the note please. --Halavar (talk) 14:28, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

 Done--Jacek Halicki (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Ok, good now. --Halavar (talk) 14:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 14:56, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, Kościół cmentarny Świętego Krzyża 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Jacek Halicki 12:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC) *  Support Good quality. --Moroder 12:59, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:47, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Thibaut120094 09:11, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tarnobrzeg, ul. Pawłowskiego 14, muzeum 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO is OK, see notes. --Jacek Halicki 22:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Ok to me. Mattbuck 22:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saints Peter and Paul church in Nysa, seminary, view from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The tree in the foreground is unwelcome and mask the subject ...

Scope refers to the seminary, not a church. The seminary is not covered. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:49, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 036.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:08, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 043.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 046.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:18, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Nysa, kościół św. Jakuba Starszego 060.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)