User talk:Jnn
The tolerant person who can forgive the mistake of the person is a splendid person
Babel user information |
---|
Users by language |
Murayama Kaita self-portrait.jpg, 村山槐多の自画像について
[edit]はじめまして、Jnn さん。村山槐多の自画像をアップロードした者です。 このファイルに Jnn さんが {{copyvio}} を貼り付けられたようですので、お話し合いに伺いました。
この絵画の著作権は村山槐多にあり、1919年に死亡した彼の著作権はすでに失効しています。 絵画の写真術による複製品については、一般的に、撮影者の著作権を認めないことになっています。 これが {{PD-Art}} の意味するところです。ご参考までに templete:PD-Art/ja に翻訳をおきました。 また、文化庁のウェブサイトのコンテンツである http://bushclover.nime.ac.jp/c-edu/answer.asp?Q_ID=0000559 でも同様の解釈が下されています。
以上により、槐多の自画像の転載は著作権上何の問題もないと私は考えています(これが許されないと、写楽の浮世絵などもコモンズから消えることになりますし)。
ただ、アップロードした本人が {{copyvio}} を剥がすのもどうかと思いますので、
もしご納得いただけるのであれば Jnn さんの手で剥がしていただければと思うのですが…
(ついでに言えば、Author: も消していただければ……市立美術館はこの絵画については単なる所有者にすぎません)。
ご納得いただけないのでしたら、残念ですが、正式に削除依頼に出していただくようお願いいたします。
--Kareha 13:25, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
写真UPLOAD
[edit]はじめまして。 ちょおとお願いがあります。寺とかの写真UPLOADしたら別のカテゴリに入れて欲しいんです。そしてその新しいカテゴリは Temples of Japan っていうカテゴリのサブカテゴリにして下さい。全部の写真 Hyogo prefecture のカテゴリに入れないようにお願いします。 Geofrog 02:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- できるだけ意向に沿うようにしたいとおもいます。・・・・が、あまりにもコモンズはカテゴリが多いのでほかにも気が付かずに流れ作業てきに違うとこにいれてしまうことがあるかもしれないのでそれは勘弁してくださいな--Jnn 16:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I don't claim ownership of that image; it was uploaded by UninvitedCompany on en.wikipedia. Please read the actual image description next time ;-) Ask UninvitedCompany for "OTRS ticket #178150", as stated in the image description as well. --Magnus Manske 12:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- my person does not understand English (or understands it with considerable difficulties).ごめん 単語は調べればわかるけど英文わわかりません・・・機械翻訳してもいまいちピンとこないです。単純にcommonsにはブックカバーのテンプレートがないのでそれに相当するのに付け替えてほしいだけなんだけどな--Jnn 13:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:Kibitujinja5164.JPG
[edit]You might like to know that your photo is now being used - see nl:Rododendron#Geschiedenis
TeunSpaans 18:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I cannot read Japanese
[edit]But the images you left in my talk page are not comparable to the ones I uploaded:
- Image:Nintendodsfrench-trim.jpg was just a screenshot of the Nintendo DS logo and the Nintendo logo, both copyrighted.
- Image:Psp_ceramic_white_trim.jpg was a screenshot of a copyrighted PSP game.
Regards. --Dodo 13:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not OK. Both videoconsole shown protected content (logos and a game) on their screens, so I think those photos are copyvios. And also the derivative ones you uploaded. --Dodo 19:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Portopia81-rokkocable-ticket-right.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--KENPEI 15:52, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Portopia81-rokkocable-ticket-back.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--KENPEI 16:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Fireball burnett big.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Davepape 19:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:OAS-Fujimori-crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--F3rn4nd0 22:02, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:OAS-Fujimori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--F3rn4nd0 22:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hikone castle5537.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image deletion warning | Image:Sumaura-Sanjoyuen2214.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Your template categorizes the images your upload in Category:Photography of Japan, thus making this category impossible to maintain. Also, it hides the standard information templates, and your images' pages become impossible to parse in an automated fashion. I urge you to reconsider the use of this template. Have a look at File:George Gamow.JPG: Japan-related category is totally irrelevant, and the authorship, date and license tags added to the picture are totally wrong, making your upload a copyfraud. Again, please find another way to deal with your uploads. --Eusebius (talk) 09:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:George_Gamow.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:George_Gamow.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:George_Gamow.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eusebius (talk) 09:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Dindon5887.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:04, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! TIRGO+Matterhorn3666.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lavauxexpress4761h.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mimurotoji5553.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kouonji5837.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Missing meteorite name
[edit]Hi! Missing meteorite name: File:Inseki34.JPG. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 07:20, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zenkouji7835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aejinjya9834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
File:Al-Ahly_Stadium2381.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.182.248 17:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Kasadomaru4000.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vantey (talk) 04:35, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
File:Kasadomaru4000-org.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vantey (talk) 04:35, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
File:AspireTower2428.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 15:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
File:Inseki34.JPG
[edit]Is File:Inseki34.JPG a fragment of the Imilac meteorite? -- Basilicofresco (msg) 12:41, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Userpage
[edit]Hi Jnn, going through you userpage, I noticed some images have been deleted. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 13:48, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
File:20-Flower0168.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kulmalukko (talk) 20:47, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
これらのファイルに{{subst:npd}}を貼られているようですが、コピー元の日本語版ウィキペディアの写真は投稿者自身による撮影でGFDLで許諾されているようです。なぜ「このファイルには使用許諾の証拠がありません」になるのかもう少し説明していただけますか?OTRSチケットは私もみられませんし、特定の人だけなので、もう少し理由を説明していただけるとわかりやすいです。これに関連してFile:Okayamajou08.JPGについても同様のテンプレートが自ら投稿された写真に貼られているのも、もう少し説明がないと理由がわからないです。よろしくお願いします。--Nightingale (talk) 03:12, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- ja:利用者‐会話:Nnn#岡山城内での展示物の撮影についてのコメントにある撮影禁止区域内での撮影が理由と理解してよろしいでしょうか?もしそうであれば、このケースではCommons:著作権以外の制限のハウスルールによって削除依頼をするのが適切ではないかと思います。写真の著作者がその写真の著作権に関して発行する許諾およびライセンスと 撮影場所における撮影許諾とは別です。後者のケースでの削除依頼の理由は前述のハウスルールの違反ということになります。削除の依頼は全て記録されてその理由も記録されます。将来この削除事例を参照することもありますので適切な削除の手続きをご理解ください。--Nightingale (talk) 03:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
You may consider to upload this as 屋外美術 in ja wikipedia. Yours sincerely, Nightingale (talk) 02:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Koiso2122.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Takabeg (talk) 02:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
The photography : 神戸甲南、武庫の郷にて、蓑 Japanese raincoat
[edit]Hello, I would like to know where you took this picture? In which museum? It seems to me that the characters around the coat are Chinese, not enough to see any Japanese writing. Am I wrong. Please tell me!--Ambrebalte (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Maikokoen73.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vantey (talk) 12:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Chikubu-jima121651.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PhysalusAntiquorum (talk) 20:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Tsubosaka4285.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
G I Chandor (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, G I Chandor (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Is it a shō?
[edit]If this is shō(Japanese), please indicate it on the flie's page. Some Wikipedian treat it as sheng(Chinese).
I'm not sure if this is a shō or a sheng, so ask you first.--S099001(talk on Commons/talk on zh.wikipedia) 13:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
File:Cajon070520.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guanaco (talk) 22:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:36, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
File:Otoshidama93.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:20, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:49, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Kobe-keiba6379.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |