User talk:LukaszKatlewa
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 15:19, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Karaczajewsk i Teberda.jpg was uncategorized on 4 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:19, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
File:EVER ups sinline 3000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ever power systems.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ever power systems.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
pjahr @ 13:09, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Russian abstainer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Lenin Krasnodar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Karachayevsk University.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Karachayevsk monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Cherkessk Lenin monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Batchaev monument Karachayevsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Na Ukrainie nie ma tzw. "wolności panoramy" (FoP, Freedom of Panorama), tj. umieszczenie w przestrzeni "zewnętrznej" dzieła (jak pomnik, budynek etc.) nie przenosi go do domeny publicznej. W większości krajów jest, ale nie tam. Zatem w domenie publicznej są tylko dzieła, których prawa autorskie wygasły w inny sposób. Masur (talk) 12:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Nameplate Romet.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
File tagging File:Etykieta Piwa Gdańskiego.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Etykieta Piwa Gdańskiego.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Rybec (talk) 22:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Ayran made in Caucas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gazebo (talk) 07:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Czapa kaukaska.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Voltteri (talk) 10:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Foto profesorów
[edit]Hej! Co do fotografii paszportowej, ja bym argumentował że ona w ogóle nie jest utworem, bowiem nie ma w niej miejsca na jakikolwiek wkład kreatywny (głowę ustawiasz zawsze tak samo, lewy półprofil z odsłoniętym uchem itd.). I dlatego traktowałbym ją jako nie-utwór w domenie publicznej z definicji. Natomiast czy zdjęcie w PSB jest fotografią paszportową czy dyplomową - to już insza inszość. Bo w dyplomowej autor zdjęcia faktycznie ma większe pole do popisu i można argumentować, że to jednak jest utwór.
Co do zdjęcia wykonanego na zamówienie - nie możemy założyć, że autor zdjęcia przekazał prawo do publikacji zdjęcia akurat na warunkach licencji CC. Dlatego w takim wypadku przydałaby się zgoda wyrażona przez samego fotografa - albo jakiś dokument poświadczający przeniesienie autorskich praw majątkowych na osobę wyrażającą zgodę. Wiem, mnie też to denerwuje, ale co poradzisz. W razie wątpliwości - zawsze jest Commons:Licensing. Halibutt (talk) 10:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:El-Mellah 2017.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:El-Mellah 2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:El-Mellah 2017.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 23:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Janusz Tadeusz Cieslinski Gdansk University of Technology.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Janusz Tadeusz Cieslinski Gdansk University of Technology.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Wladyslaw Palubicki 1933-2012.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Wladyslaw Palubicki 1933-2012.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wladyslaw Palubicki 1933-2012.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Karol Taylor.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Karol Taylor.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Karol Taylor.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 23:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Marek Biziuk.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Biziuk.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Marek Biziuk.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 23:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Triggo electric microcar opened closed.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Triggo electric microcar opened closed.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Triggo electric microcar opened closed.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Triggo electric microcar efficient parking.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Triggo electric microcar efficient parking.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Triggo electric microcar efficient parking.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Triggo electric city microcar traffic street view.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Triggo electric city microcar traffic street view.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Triggo electric city microcar Poland parking.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Triggo electric city microcar Poland parking.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Triggo electric city microcar Poland parking.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Triggo electric city car traffic jam effective transportation.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Triggo electric city car traffic jam effective transportation.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Triggo electric city car traffic jam moving.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Triggo electric city car traffic jam moving.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Triggo electric city car traffic jam moving.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Triggo battery electric microcar street view.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Triggo battery electric microcar street view.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Triggo battery electric microcar street view.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 09:53, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello LukaszKatlewa.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Yann (talk) 06:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
i znów - prawa autorskie
[edit]O Yann się nie martw - "przejąłem cię". A konkrety, jak pozwolisz, po świętach. Nawet jak coś skasują, to odtworzę, jak będzie już ok. Masur (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Pliki
[edit]To lecimy. Nauczymy cię ładnie na konkretnych przykładach, ok?
- File:Janusz Tadeusz Cieslinski Gdansk University of Technology.jpg
- Tu zasotosowanie ma procedura Commons:Pozwolenia. Tam jest to szczegółowo opisane. Skoro zdjęcia wykonał fotograf w ramach obowiązku pracy, to majątkowe prawa autorskie należą do jego pracodawcy i u niego należy szukać zgody (czyli osoba z politechniki, która może takimi prawami dysponować). Licencja z kolei może być dowolna, byle wolna. Zwykle cc-by-sa 4.0, bo jest wygodna.
- Zdjęcia archiwalne z PG. O ile polibuda jest właścicielem majątkowych praw autorskich to patrz wyżej. O ile nie jest i właściciel nie jest znany (uwaga, posiadanie fotografii to nie majątkowe prawa autorskie - należy znać autora i/lub posiadacza tychże praw), to niestety takich zdjęć ładować nie można (dzieło osierocone).
- Czy np. czy Politechnika Gdańska może uwolnić prawa autorskie do fotografii paszportowej przedwojennego niemieckiego profesora? PG jest ciągle tą samą instytucją, więc z braku innego właściciela zdjęcia można chyba założyć, że zdjęcie którego jedyna kopia jest w archiwum zakładu pracy to wykonał je np. zakładowy fotograf (tak jak to się stało w przypadku prof. Cieślińskiego) - jak paszportowa i stara, to być może jest już w domenie publicznej i niepotzrebna jest zgoda. Kwestia dokładnej daty i kilku szczegółów.
- Jak np. mam unikalne zdjęcie z konferencji PUGWASH 1966 przed Grand Hotelem w Sopocie. - niestety, to dzieło osierocone. Nie możemy ładować.
- Triggo - skoro fotograf zakupił tło, to niekoniecznie oznacza, że nabył pelne majątkowe prawa autorskie (czyli czy np. może re-licencjonować dzieło z takim tłem na wybranej wolnej licencji). I ogólnie, procedura: Commons:Pozwolenia, czyli wymagana jest zgoda właśc. majątkowych praw autorskich.
- File:Wladyslaw Palubicki 1933-2012.jpg
- Czy to traktuje się jako utwór [...]? O tym decydowałby sąd. A na Commons obowiązuje nas zasada ostrożności - zakładamy, że jest to dzieło.
- Jaka tu licencja i czy spadkobierca może uwolnić? tak, spadkobierca, skoro [...] zapłacił sam zainteresowany. Licencja ponownie - jakakolwiek wolna. Patrz Commons:Pozwolenia.
- File:Batchaev monument Karachayevsk.jpg i File:Karachayevsk University.jpg
- Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Russia - zatem budynki są OK. Ale rzeźby i pomniki (czy muralne), o ile nie są w domenie publicznej, już nie.
- Czy można wykonać foto pomnika choćby w szerszym planie? - o ile nie będzie w oczywisty sposób z fotografii wynikać, że intencją fotografującego było jednak pokazanie pomnika oraz gdy nie stanowi on centralnej (głównej) części fotografii, to można.
I ogólniej, zawsze Commons:Zakres projektu/Zasada ostrożności. Nie wiem, nie jestem pewien, nie mogę ustalić - nie ładuje. Co do wolności panoramy, to nikt nie zarzuci złej wolej, bo można zwyczajnei nie wiedzieć, jak to wygląda w różnych krajach, zatem luz. Masur (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2019
[edit]Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.
If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".
If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--23:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
File:NordGlass automotive glass manufacturer Koszalin Poland logo.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:NordGlass automotive glass manufacturer Koszalin Poland logo.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
File:NordGlass automotive glass manufacturer factory Slupsk Poland.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:NordGlass automotive glass manufacturer factory Slupsk Poland.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:13, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
File:NordGlass automotive glass manufacturer factory Koszalin Poland.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]File:NordGlass automotive glass manufacturer factory Koszalin Poland.jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: No OTRS permission for 30 days
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
[edit]Dear LukaszKatlewa,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Fantastyka 1-82.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tagishsimon (talk) 07:44, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Fantastyka 1-82.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Fantastyka 1-82.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fantastyka 1-82.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Missvain (talk) 23:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2021
[edit]Drogi Wikimedianinie,
piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!
Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem wikimedia.pl/zabytki/. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września.
Pozdrawiam, Jamnik z Tarnowa Speak? 15:38, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started
[edit]Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.
If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".
If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Swastikas on the wedding dress, British colony, 1910.jpg
[edit]"British colony" is rather vague. Could you be more specific? Which colony? Where? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- The owner told that, making me sure that the dress has nothing in common with later nazi conotations. Thats all what we know. LukaszKatlewa (talk) 12:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Układ okresowy z Politechniki Gdańskiej
[edit]Witam, może by tak ustalić dokładniejszą datę? Jako że widnieje pierwiastek ren i masuria, jeden odkryty, a u drugiego niepotwierdzone odkrycie z 1925, więc układ pochodzi najwcześniej z tego roku. Co do braku polonu to podejrzewam, że powstał już po wrześniu 1939 i zanikł z uwagi na wojnę z Polską, w dodatku wcześniej Gdańsk to był WMG, który miał z Polską dobre stosunki, a i sam Hitler od 1933 do początku 1939 zabiegał o dobre stosunki z Polską, więc mała szansa, aby był sprzed 1939. Co prawda w tym roku został odkryty frans, ale odkrycie i nazwa zostały uznane dopiero w 1949, więc podejrzewam, że to układ z początku 1940, już po aneksji WMG do Rzeszy, ale zanim niemieccy uczeni dowiedzieli się o odkryciu astatu i neptunu. Pozdrawiam. Kamilhrub (talk) 13:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Trudno jest ustalić dokładniejszą datę, istnieje możliwość, że pierwiastki były domalowywane w miarę ich odkrywania. Może ktoś biegły w czcionkach mógłby coś więcej powiedzieć (ten krój to chyba szwabacha). Najstarsze zdjęcie tego układu, do jakiego dotarłem, zostało opublikowane w 1925. Możliwe jest też, że na etapie renowacji doszło do przekłamań w niektórych szczegółach.LukaszKatlewa (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2023
[edit]Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.
If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)