User talk:OSeveno

Umbenennungen Vs. Beschreibungsänderung

Hi, wenn du eine Anfrage zur Umbenennung wie hier machst und einen anderen Titel möchtest, als das was in der Beschreibung steht, so wirst du immer Probleme haben, dazu umbenannt zu bekommen. Woher soll ich denn wissen was stimmt? Du musst schon eine komplette Vorarbeit machen. Das bedeutet eben auch, die Beschreibung korrekt zu ändern. Denn dort steht nach wie vor "Rustenburg" statt "Buitenrust". Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

@Marcus Cyron: Sie sind ganz richtig. Ich habe nicht genug Aufmerksamkeit gezahlt. Dafür entschuldige ich mich. Und ich werde es von nun an beobachten. Vielen Dank für Ihre Mitteilung. Mittlerweile habe ich die Beschreibung korrigiert. --OSeveno (talk) 16:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Klasse, danke! :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:19, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

ICJ Seal

Hi. I uploaded , based on your image. - Ssolbergj (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Press credentials

Hello. You raised the issue of press credentials at meta:Talk:Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_Plan/2016-2017/draft#Protecting_Commons_photographers_from_harassment_by_police_or_security_forces. I agree that policy should be developed about this but right now, there are not many people demanding this service so I think it will be 2-3 years at the soonest before the Wikimedia Foundation could possibly become involved in the issue.

I also do not think that a regional authority is best for managing an international process, but such as things are, if you find it useful to talk with the New York City group about this, then I and perhaps others would join in a conversation with you. No one has all the answers to this issue but I care and would discuss. Thanks for your interest. Special:EmailUser/Bluerasberry Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear OSeveno,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Renaming files donated by the Peace Palace Library - please leave donor number in!

Bester Osveno,

I see you changed filenames taking out numbers, for instance 9308 out of what is now File:Dankaerts-Historis-9308 - Franconia map.tiff in an earlier version. But these numbers have a meaning, i could have told you if you had asked. The donor and i can check and track whether the numbered images are there. If you take them out, i can't easily track them, it gets too messy. So if you want to change filenames please do it like

A - B - number => A - B - number - your description

Dankaerts-Historis-9308 => Dankaerts-Historis-9308 - Franconia map, or similar

then the files of an author show up in numerical order and can be tracked. Do you have a list of all my uploaded filenames you have changed? I want to keep the donation neat in this respect. Just discuss with me what you don't like. Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

PS. This upload has to be done in a hurry in 2014, good descriptions were not available, so i only had the donation number, author and book name to go by. The donor and I still use the number to check if files are lost etc. for instance "where in 6308?" etc.

PS2 See what i mean Category:Prints_from_Dankaerts_Historis_at_the_Peace_Palace_Library? Hansmuller (talk) 21:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

The filename system with the donor number after author and title puts the images in their category in the order of the pages in the book! Hansmuller (talk) 08:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear Hansmuller, I am glad you contacted me about this matter. Please don't take my answer personally. I do not know if you are a volunteer like me, but I do a lot of categorizing just for the sake of helping Commons improve and grow. This can be very boring work, but by doing so I help make media retrievable for people looking for a media to go with their article. Giving media files descriptive names is just as important. I am wondering weather the Commons rules on this are clear to the donor ? If not, someone should have explained them. Often it seems that bulk donors are mostly concerned with their own systems. They seem to forget that if every donor does this, Commons Wikimedia will soon turn into a modern Babylon. I would hope the donor gives the respect it deserves to the system used by Commons, but it seems many don't. Regretfully, the intentions often don't match the implementation. Example: I often see institutions write down the name of the photographer that took a picture of a painting as the author of the painting. It's not fair of donors to expect us Commons volunteers to clean up the mess after them. It doesn't matter if the donor was in a hurry, since the rules on Commons are very clear. A file name must be descriptive of it's content. Just filling in some archive number isn't acceptable. Possibly Commons can create a different way for the donor to track the files. Perhaps by using a script within a template ? I love the Peace Palace Library and all it stands for. As a matter of fact, I have several times visited the Peace Palace and it's library. Now, I am open to reasoning. So, my question to you is: Is this donor going to provide descriptive names for all uploaded media, or is the donor expecting from Commons volunteers that we do that work for them ? Where these on-descriptive file names intended as a temporary solution ? If so, I suggest that there be a template created stating this fact and it to be placed on the page of each file. Otherwise you'll have to write a lot more messages like this in the future, unless you expect us to know this by telepathic powers. In the mean while, until this matter has been resolved I will (at least temporarily) refrain from further renaming of this donors files. Regards, --oSeveno (talk) 23:43, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear Osveno,

I come back later to your donor question. In the mean time of course your improving filenames is appreciated, as long as you keep the order of the pages in the original book, which is guaranteed by keeping the number in the file name. I have changed some of the new filenames to keep the page order (= the donor number order) in Category:Prints_from_Dankaerts_Historis_at_the_Peace_Palace_Library, for example

• your change to => File:Brandenburg map from Dankaerts Historis.tif, my change to => File:Dankaerts-Historis-9280 - Brandenburg map.tiff.

Now we have

• 1. author 2. book title 3. donation number 4. description,

in the proper order in the filename. In the category the order now is again is the order of the illustrations in the book.

PS1 Most mass uploaders all use a system like this with donor numbers, i also used it for Naturalis, for example Category:Songbird specimens at Naturalis Biodiversity Center or User:Husky's Category:Media from Atlas of Mutual Heritage.

PS2 If you change a filename by adding a description, please start by filling in the description field in the template if it's not done before. And there is the risk of overinterpretation of an image, for instance your change in what is now called File:Nieuhof-Ambassade-vers-la-Chine-1665 0746-2 - Ambassadeurs Logement.tiff. ("Ambassadeurs Logement") You supposed this was the "Dutch embassy". I filled in the description - it is just the lodging for the night, no embassy yet. But then the Dutch visitors to the emperor of China were allowed to fly the Dutch flag, or at least the illustration suggests this...perhaps the flag was added later for the European readership ;-)).
Best regards, Hansmuller (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear OSeveno, I still owe you an explanation why i had to dump many images in 2014 quickly on Commons. In the project Wikipedians in Special Residence (nl, en incomplete) i could visit eleven Dutch institutions to help them donate to and work with Wikipedia in a fixed time schedule. The first large batch of ~2000 photographs was donated by the Peace Palace Library, but i couldn't transfer the scarce descriptions which could not be used for file names of the photographs anyway: it was "take them or leave them", a gift not to be discarded. So in a run against the clock i have uploaded them with as much information as was available then. This year i have added 1000+ missing descriptions so that the bulk of the collection is now described. Ugly filenames remain, however they contain the author, booktitle and a sequence number by the photographer which follows the order of the pages in the book. Thank you, regards, Hansmuller (talk) 14:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Hansmuller, thank you for the explanation. It does make me understand the predicament you were in. It's great you are willing to do this on site work. Nonetheless, it should still be possible to adjust the file names to meet the Commons requirement that they should be descriptive of the content. Perhaps you could make an appeal to the Commons community to help out. Don't forget, that other Commons members could start renaming the images on the same grounds. Maybe better to take charge yourself and that way have some control over the format of the file names. I'd gladly join such an effort. Regards, --oSeveno (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Anna van Hannoverstraat 13, The Hague. Img.nr. 10.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Anna van Hannoverstraat 13, The Hague. Img.nr. 10.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Anna van Hannoverstraat 8, The Hague. Img.nr. 05.jpg

---

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Anna van Hannoverstraat 8, The Hague. Img.nr. 05.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (), No derivative works (), or All Rights Reserved (), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as (CC BY), (CC BY-SA), (CC0) and (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Logo Hague Academy of International Law.svg

File:Logo Hague Academy of International Law.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Muhandes (talk) 09:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

I notice your request for a speedy delete was rejected by a moderator? --oSeveno (talk) 22:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Kalvermarkt-Stadhuis tram stop, The Hague, 2016.jpg

File:Kalvermarkt-Stadhuis tram stop, The Hague, 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Institution:Koninklijk Kabinet van Zeldzaamheden

Institution:Koninklijk Kabinet van Zeldzaamheden has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this institution, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vincent Steenberg (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Insults must be deleted

Hi. I will make a request for you. Revision texts of publicly insulted changes to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk are hidden in the Dutch Wikipedia. If you are a competent (an administrator), delete them, please. If you do not have the authority to do this, open a topic for it on the article's discussion page or communicate with someone who can do it. I can not make any changes in the Dutch Wikipedia. I connect to the Wikis via VPN because Wikipedia is banned in my country.

The changes that need to be deleted from the revision text record are: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] (The second of the same change, must be deleted), [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Thank you so much. - Ullierlich (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

• Attention: see also User talk:Richardw#Insults must be deleted where I have explained why this request cannot be honored. Copying this request to the article's talk page is in my opinion not a good idea since it will only bring more attention to the disputed revisions. @Ullierlich: I am an administrator on the Dutch Wikipedia. It is of no use to put this request on other talk pages if you don't get your way. Richard 08:12, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
  • And here I thought this historical photograph was a good example of the popular worship that existed for the subject of the article. After all, it is not a photo of the demolishing of a statute, but of the erection of a statue. The photo is on the Dutch language Wikipedia, and in the Netherlands it is very uncommon to erect statue's of popular political leaders, while they are still alive. Therefor, the photo is a 'speaking' example to point out a difference in culture of different countries. It underlines the popularity of the subject of the article during his life. It is of educational value. The photo therefor should be within the boundaries of good taste of the Dutch language Wikipedia. Besides that, the suggestion that placing the photo was intended for the purpose of insulting anyone, is ridiculous. I would never try to use Wikipedia e.a. for political, religious or ethnicity related opinions. Nor should anyone else. --oSeveno (talk) 17:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Goran Jelisić shooting a victim in Brčko, Bosnia and Herzegovina.jpg

File:Goran Jelisić shooting a victim in Brčko, Bosnia and Herzegovina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Huntster (t @ c) 08:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Alamy

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jan Antonisz van Ravesteyn 001 (40016503951).jpg

"The same file appears on Alamy.com, where it is being sold. On Alamy.com they actually copy/pasted the description from Wikimedia Commons, violating the CC BY-SA 3.0 license on all text on Wikimedia Commons."

Alamy didn't just copy/paste the description, they got the image here. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:18, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: Thanks for that piece of info. Is there something being done about this? Legal action? Or a cease and desist letter? After all, they are violating licenses. If you prefer, we could start a topic about this at Commons talk:Commons clones --oSeveno (talk) 09:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

I don't know how lengthy the description was, if a Commons user wrote it or if it was imported from Flickr, can't find the Flickr file.. The description may not have been long enough to be eligible for copyright protection. If this interests you, take a look at Commons talk:How Alamy is stealing your images. Yeah, I still have to patch that up.. But anyway, they know about this. They occasionally vandalize their Wikipedia article with paid socks. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:48, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:170824 Koenders bij Touch Dutch Base 002.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:170824 Koenders bij Touch Dutch Base 002.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:32, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv:  Done Regards, --oSeveno (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Flickr2Commons

Why don't you use it? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 07:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

@Alexis Jazz: In the past I tried out others, but didn't like them. Perhaps this one has improved enough to try again. I will try it out next time. Thank you for the advice. --oSeveno (talk) 10:11, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear OSeveno,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Dr. Werner Schröder, Beauftragte des Reichskommissars für die Stadt Amsterdam.png

@OSeveno: since you were the uploader, I wanted to inform you, I added some information to the file. It might be helpful in case there are other images you come across. Thank you for your time. :-) Lotje (talk) 11:48, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

@Lotje: I'm trying to figure out what you did precisely, and why. You created an empty page on English Wikipedia for Stapf Bilderdienst? --oSeveno (User talk) 12:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi OSeveno,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Proposal to replace Template:Indefblocked-global with Template:Indefblocked-global-WPstyle

please see answers at the above link Calvinkulit (talk) 09:41, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I'll do that. --oSeveno (User talk) 10:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

there's another reply Calvinkulit (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Make the Confirmed right automatically revoked after the account is 4 days old

There's another one. Calvinkulit (talk) 04:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Blank world map with subnational borders, without Antartica.svg

File:Blank world map with subnational borders, without Antartica.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cherkash (talk) 19:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:Anton_Sijthoff

Category:Anton_Sijthoff has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

NearEMPTiness (talk) 13:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Template:Licensed-PD-Art

Naar aanleiding van File:Overzicht, prent - 's-Gravenhage - 20090543 - RCE.jpg: De mooiste oplossing is meestal {{Licensed-PD-Art}}. Ik gebruik dat bijvoorbeeld voor dit soort uploads. Als je een foto tegenkomt van een schilderij of ander (2D) kunstwerk dat in het publiek domein is, maar voorzien is van een Creative Commons licentie dan kan je {{Licensed-PD-Art}} gebruiken. Meestal krijg je dan iets als {{Licensed-PD-Art|PD-old-100-expired|Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Multichill (talk) 11:25, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Adam Schadee

Hi OSeveno,

Op OTRS hebben wij een bericht ontvangen betreffende deze afbeelding, door jou geupload. De mailer (architectuurhistoricus van beroep) zegt dat het hier niet de architect, maar een in Den Haag woonachtige notaris met dezelfde naam betreft - bij de mail is een kleine weergave van een man met kort wit haar, bovenop zijn hoofd geen haar maar enkel een 'krans', een puntige snor, en geen baard gevoegd: dat zou de "echte" architect Schadee zijn. Zijn bron is dit boek, waar hij ook de foto uitgehaald heeft die hij naar ons zond.

Ik heb getracht in het Haags archief meer informatie te vinden over de afbeelding, maar vang daar bot. Kun jij misschien een antwoord geven op de persoonsverwisseling? Ciell (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

@Ciell: Ik heb het uitgezocht. De foto is inderdaad van een andere Schadee. De juiste staat op deze foto. Ik denk dat die nog niet op Commons kan. Ik heb alvast de foto verwijderd van de Wikidata en Wikipedia pagina's. Bedankt! --oSeveno (User talk) 20:56, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Ja, dat is de man die ook op de afbeelding in de mail staat. Dank voor het corrigeren! Ciell (talk) 21:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Otto Willem de Nobel

Beste OSeveno, ik zie dat jij je regelmatig (?) ophoudt in den Haag. Ik ben op zoek naar een foto van het grafmonument van Otto Willem de Nobel, dat te bewonderen is op de Algemene Begraafplaats Kerkhoflaan in Den Haag. Het zou gaan om vak B/V10/29. Het beeld wordt nog genoemd in de gids Graven van historisch belangrijke graven uit 2009. Het bestaat uit een lier, stemvork en een afbeelding van een opkomende zon. Zie jij een mogelijkheid?Ceescamel (talk) 09:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@Ceescamel: Dat wil ik wel doen hoor. Het zal niet lang op zich laten wachten. Groeten, --oSeveno (User talk) 10:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

@Ceescamel: De foto's staan hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Graf_van_Otto_Willem_de_Nobel Groeten, --oSeveno (User talk) 18:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Prachtig! Ik ga nog even nakijken of ik de naam van de kunstenaar kan vinden; ik heb alleen de achternaam Hoek. Mocht je eropuit willen met dit weer, ik zoek ook nog een foto van een doorzichtige wereldbol bij een kantoor van de ANWB. Dat beeld stond ooit in Asd, maar is vertrokken. Ikzelf was gisteren bij een 100 meter lang gedicht,Ceescamel (talk) 09:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Graag contact

@OSeveno: graag contact ivm foutieve gegevens https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Luitenant-kolonel_Tede_Beets_(1880-1958),_ca._1941.png?uselang=nl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annerobe (talk • contribs) 10:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@Annerobe: Als er verkeerde gegevens bij het bestand staan, en dat uit openbare gegevens blijkt, kan je dat rustig bewerken. Misschien kan je delen uit welke gegevens dat blijkt? --oSeveno (User talk) 12:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

@OSeveno: Heb inmiddels een correctie aangebracht in Nederlands en FR/D/E verwijderd om verwarring te voorkomen. Het betreft de gegevens van mijn vader en traceerbaar via o.a. NIMH, KNIL, en MinDef. Annerobe (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

@Annerobe: In orde natuurlijk. Ik heb afgelopen weken op Dailymotion de TV serie Colditz (1972-1974)(weer) bekeken. Uiteraard was de werkelijkheid van het leven in Colditz anders dan in de serie, maar het laat je wel nadenken. En in de serie werd uitstekend geacteerd. --oSeveno (User talk) 13:47, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Beschryving_van_'sGraven-hage

Beschryving van 'sGraven-hage has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 11:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Gebruikerspagina

@OSeveno: er staat een spellingsfoutje op je gebruikerspagina. Mocht je het willen corrigeren... Of misschien deed jet het met opzet. Lotje (talk) 15:29, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Grootzegel van de Bataafse Republiek (1802).svg

In this image, the AE diphthong should be single letter, Æ, which is a usual practice at the time. Could you please fix it? Thanks.
See: File:Emblem of the Batavian Commonwealth.svg.

-- Great Brightstar (talk) 13:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

@Great Brightstar No problem, thanks for the info, I will do that. oSeveno (User talk) 13:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Adam Schadee (notary).jpg

Hallo OSeveno, volgens de beschrijving "notary". Volgens het lemma was hij architect. De datum van geboorte/overlijden lijken overeen te stemmen. Indien correct kan de afbeelding worden toegevoegd op Wikidata? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 15:31, 15 September 2023 (UTC)