User talk:Pikador

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pikador!


File source is not properly indicated: File:Janwegner.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Janwegner.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Janwegner.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Prośba o małe poprawki na grafice

[edit]

Szkoda, że się opóźnia, daty zmieniłem. Pozdrawiam, Chrumps (talk) 15:58, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Też zauważyłem, że jakość się pogorszyła, ale nic z tym nie zrobię, bo to zależy od wielkości wyświetlanego obrazka. Na innych wiki jest jeszcze gorzej, bo są mniejsze. Chrumps (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Daty zaktualizowałem. Mogliby już zbudować te teleskopy, to bym nie musiał zmieniać. Pozdrawiam, Chrumps (talk) 22:47, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

NGC 4119 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Auntof6 (talk) 08:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Figbird

[edit]

Hi. The source I use is The Slater Field Guide to Australian Birds. They identify the figbird as sphecotheres viridis. That's all I know. Sardaka (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks for the clarification. I'll have to leave it to you. I'm somewhat out of my depth. Sardaka (talk) 09:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In wild, not zoo. Would it matter?Sardaka (talk) 09:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]