User talk:Popolon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Image deletion warning Image:Dsc00076.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Popolon 20:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:Dsc00076.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  ދިވެހިބަސް  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  íslenska  italiano  日本語  한국어  조선말  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  occitan  polski  پښتو  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  shqip  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Popolon 20:27, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 00:22, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 21:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HD Template

[edit]

Hi! I have an HD template for GIMP if you want it. -- carol 06:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour

[edit]

:)

--pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I studied for several years at university and lived in Beijing for 6 months, on exchange. But now it is slowly leaking out of my brain, unfortunately!
BTW, you'll have to show me how to install Chinese input on Xubuntu, if you can :) --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 17:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done Popolon (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Mao et lama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 14:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palestine_State_Recognition.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Night w (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Popolon!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 00:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Édicule_Guimard-Gare_de_Lyon-Bd_Diderot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Léna (talk) 11:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

[edit]
Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Popolon,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki loves monument

[edit]

Bonjour,

Comme vous le savez sans doute, un grand concours de photographie organisé par l'association a eu lieu au mois de septembre : Wiki Loves Monuments. L'événement sera conclu par une soirée de remise des prix, qui aura lieu le 9 décembre 2011 à Paris, dans la salle Notre-Dame de l'hôtel de Cluny (qui abrite le musée national du Moyen Âge). La cérémonie aura lieu à 19h30, mais il sera auparavant possible de visiter gratuitement le musée (à partir de 18h).

Pour ceux qui veulent rester ensuite, on pense réserver un restaurant (chacun payant alors sa part), à partir de 22h.

Si tu souhaites venir, merci de me contacter par mail.--Thesupermat (talk) 11:32, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, your edits left something of a mess in the image description, because:
1) It's obviously a lion, not a bulldog.
2) The fact that the eagle has a direct quote from Josiah Tattnall in 1858 is highly relevant, even if the cartoonist was born in 1872. AnonMoos (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you already seen lions with bulldog head (flat face and falling ears, have you translated the chinese title of the article, did you look at the first version, do you know the mascot of the UK ??? Bear is for russia, bard eagle for the usa, and frog for the france in the uk point of vue, but not the gaellic frog, for french, the mascot is the gaellic rooster. Do you see ths script to be highly relevant ???Popolon (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have very little idea what you think you're taking about, but I wrote most of the original English-language annotations to both File:Politcal Map of 19th Century China(時局全圖).jpg and File:时局图.jpg, and a lion is not a bulldog (though sometimes Chinese artists had a way of assimilating the facial features of lions and so-called "lion dogs"). Since your English seems to be a little shaky, maybe you should refrain from attempting to write extended expository passages in it. Merci... AnonMoos (talk) 21:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really basing this solely and exclusively on a chocolate advertisement? AnonMoos (talk) 02:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added more historical information about this collector card (not advertisement)Popolon (talk) 23:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The page was moved by an admin to File:Fictitious Tibetan Flag-before 1912.svg. This was apparently based on discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TibetanFlag-before1912.svg. Based what may be consensus in the DR, I suggested a move to File:Unidentified flag appearing on Potala illustration. If that is acceptable to you, I plan to ask for a file mover to rename the file. Okay? --Abd (talk) 20:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Weihai-Xinwen dasha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Dereckson (talk) 10:13, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


COM:AN/U

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#DR as retaliation tool action review. You've raised concerns with sound arguments I made an abuse opening a DR in this context. I then asked a review of my actions.

--Dereckson (talk) 07:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samsung Note II.multi-window and wacom stylus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mono 18:12, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samsung Note II.multiwindow vertical.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mono 23:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wacom Intuos4 Sasmung Note II et Note 10.1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mono 23:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 00:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Sigroc has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Xofc (talk) 10:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Transferred to category:Sigrok.

New level {{User VG-4}}

[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

VG-4

--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:59, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronisme

[edit]

Bonjour. Je viens de voir vos ajouts de notes à l'image de la nativité des Très Riches Heures. Vous indiquez des "anachronisme" mais en fait, sans peut-être de le savoir, vous en faites un vous même. En effet, il est anachronique de vouloir chercher une vraisemblance historique dans une représentation biblique du XVe siècle. Le but des frères de Limbourg, comme de tous les peintres de cette époque, n'est pas de représenter la réalité historique de la scène, mais au contraire, de tisser des liens entre la scène et leur réalité contemporaine de la fin du Moyen Âge. Voilà pourquoi ils ont par exemple représenté la ville de Bourges en arrière plan, ville importante pour leur commanditaire, le duc de Berry et le calice représenté avec une croix a sans doute pour modèle une pièce d'orfèvrerie propriété de ce même duc (et on pourrait en pointer d'autre : l'étole blanche portée par les mages est un symbole des Armagnac pdt la Guerre de Cent Ans, le tapis sur lequel est assis la Vierge est un tapis persan dont était amateur le duc, etc.). Voilà pourquoi pointer des anachronismes dans cette image est... anachronique ! Mel22 (talk) 09:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour ces informations, cela m'éclaire un peu plus sur le sujet. Je ne pense pas que cela rende mes ajouts anachroniques, mais effectivement, il serait peut être bon de préciser, qu'il s'agit d'une œuvre volontairement anachronique. C'est sans doute déjà le cas sur la page. J'aurais du probablement la lire avant.Popolon (talk) 12:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:TibetanFlag-before1912.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 09:06, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin noticeboard

[edit]

Hi, fyi I made a request concerning you at the admin notice board. --6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 10:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have reactivated my request for a formal warning by an admin, as my previous request was archived by a bot without an admin examining it. I hope this will allow to restart on a good base. --6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, perhaps he wants to commit wiki-suicide. Popolon, I suggest you sit back and watch, I don't see any response from you as necessary. Responding to something like this, less is more. --Abd (talk) 18:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have responded there. (permanent link.) I'm loquacious, I write a lot. Not when I have a clear goal in mind. The issues there have become very simple. We will see what admins do. There is zero chance of you being blocked if you do nothing. I'd put the chance of him being blocked this time at above fifty percent. I wasn't going to do anything about his removal of my warning, but, indeed, he set it up for that to be used on AN/U. This user can make positive contributions, so I'd hope he is not indef blocked, and, my guess, he won't be. Not this time. --Abd (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

As pointed out in the above request on AN/U, (permanent link) you repeatedly called the edits of User:6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 "vandalism." That was unnecessary and inflammatory. Please do not use such language about other users, even if you strongly disagree with them. Your edits on File:Qinghai.Mongolian yurt.jpg approached revert warring, and your last revert there repeated the vandalism claim, leading the editor to file the AN/U report.

Some users may be argumentative and difficult to deal with. However, please do not make matters worse with incivility, and please use the Talk page to resolve disputes. Ask for help if you need it. I'm willing to help negotiate consensus, or you may find others willing to mediate. --Abd (talk) 01:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abd, thank you for your advice, I will try to keep calm, find the good word instead of vandalism. At this time, the user already had reverted or suppressed lot of sourced informations on several articles on fr: wikipedia in a POV-push manner and he started to extend this on commons :(. I still don't know what is the exact word for that. Perhaps I should only add reverted sourced information, or something like that.Popolon (talk) 08:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Right. If it isn't pure vandalism, like "Poop!!!", always see if you can compromise, Assume Good Faith. You don't have to kill yourself, you have the right idea. Keep it simple. This is Commons, there shouldn't be high content conflict here. Yes, there was fr.wiki history. Set it aside for Commons. Don't focus on the "problem user," focus on your goals and our goals. And good luck, and if you ever need any assistance negotiating with a user, where you find yourself nonplussed, frustrated, ask me. If I haven't been active on Commons, send me an email. My goal is to empower users, I get more good content created that way than by creating it myself. I will work for a sane compromise, and if that's impossible, if I find that a user is really and purely a troll (which is rare), I'll report. You won't have to. I suggest reading and understanding meatball:DefendEachOther. That was original wiki culture, it has often been lost, but it works. --Abd (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank's a lot for your answer. I will try to follow a little more this rules. In about 13 years of wikipedia, that's the first time I meet a so destructive user.Popolon (talk) 12:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Then be grateful that you have lived a charmed life. Now, this is truly funny. Sure I'm banned on enwiki. What for? Well, if I wanted to trace it back, it would be for warning administrators of policy violations, which were confirmed by ArbCom, and one sysop was desysopped (basically for blocking me -- after I'd warned him), and ... it is not a popular thing to do, warn sysops!
Your response to my warning demonstrated that you are collaborative, that you can learn, that you can stand back and be tolerant, all that good stuff.
His response has demonstrated what you have written. He's looking for something wrong. He might think, "Ah! The user who warned me is Bad and I can prove it!" He's not the first to think that way!
He may not understand that removing the warning has no protective effect. It acknowledges receipt of it. It will only fool the naive. I always look through talk page history to examine removals as distinct from archiving. He can't alter the talk page history, and "Warning" shows in it. So someone looking at his behavior in the future is likely to find that, read it, and see a confirmation, if he has continued the behavior. However, this may be a throw-away account.
And now that I'm engaged and poked like that, I just might watch him occasionally to make sure he's not creating disruption, as might others. This is what we do! It is not personal. It's wiki.
Someone looking at your talk page will also see a warning, but if they look at the warning, they will see your commitment to being more careful. If you are, in fact, more careful -- as I expect you will be -- you will look quite good. All that is needed, usually, is a bit of patience, and a willingness to seek agreement. And I have no reason to think that looking over your contributions will reveal a problem. So ... thanks for your patience, and "the reward of patience is patience." --Abd (talk) 18:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Baozi - Beijing.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour, Pourriez-vous m'illuminer sur le sens de la création de cette page de discussion? Merci,--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 15:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'ai rien à ajouter, je trouve juste très étonnant leur ressemblance. Je ne crois pas avoir dit quelque chose de mal à leur encontre.Popolon (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Il s'agit d'une page de discussion d'un project collaboratif, pas d'un blog personnel. S'il n'y a rien à discuter, je vous invite à retirer cette insertion incompréhensible. Merci, --6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 08:52, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne comprends pas les problèmes qu'elle vous pose, ou ce que vous y trouver de choquant. Il s'agit de la page de discussion.Popolon (talk) 12:39, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Précisément, j'essaie de comprendre ce que vous souhaiter discuter pour améliorer la page en question, en conformité avec les règles et recommendations de Wikimedia Commons. Talk pages are not for general chatter; please keep discussions on talk pages on the topic of how to improve the associated article. Si votre ajout n'était pas destiné à améliorer la page en question (comme la présente discussion semble l'indiquer), merci de le retirer.--6-A04-W96-K38-S41-V38 (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Popolon, 6-A04 has a point, but is socially uncivil. That is, small chatty and friendly remarks may be made. This is a community of human beings. The link is to a guideline, not a rigid policy, and was obviously taken from Wikipedia ("article"). I considered removing the comment, since it offended him, but decided that it was not worth creating more burden for Recent Changes patrollers. Tant pis. In the future, Popolon, it appears that 6-A04 does not welcome small talk, so please do not offend him. We may review his contributions and feed him comments of greater weight, as warranted, of course. --Abd (talk) 20:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to refrain on pages this user change, at least when he doesn't remove sourced information, as he does so frequently.Popolon (talk) 13:44, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translation cantonese

[edit]

Hello Popolon, can you help me a translate in cantonese please? Smitersleon (talk) 10:35, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Smitersleon: I better know mandarin dialects than cantoneses one, I only barely understand cantonese speaker on most common subjects. What do you want to translate ? Should be better to ask a native chinese speaker I believe :).Popolon (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Popolon, I would translate in cantonese this page and this page for copy in this page I asked all users Cantonese but I responded no , I'm waiting . You perhaps can not help but thank you very much for the answer. By Smitersleon (talk) 15:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Popolon, can you help me in simpleenglishwikipedia and zhwikipedia please? Smitersleon (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:10 Tugriks - Verso.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:10 Tugriks - Verso.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Jarekt (talk) 13:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jarekt : This is the problem of any banknotes, there are a lot already on Category:Banknotes_by_country and in this case Category:Banknotes_of_Mongolia. I personnally scanned the banknote, so which rules need to be applied in those cases ?Popolon (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Popolon, scanning does not give you the copyrights to the work scanned. Those rights belong to the person who designed the banknote. Many countries have legislations which explain copyright status of the banknotes, but I do not know Mongolia's copyright laws. --Jarekt (talk) 22:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, but I suppose, this is considered public domain by default ?


Unfortunately, your attempt at dating does not seem to be useful here, since the U.S. was not in the Philippines until 1898, Japan had negligible influence on anything in 1858-1860, the apparent author was born in 1872, etc. Sakhalin was a territorial claim (just as the Republic of China on Taiwan was vetoing the admission of Mongolia to the UN to maintain its territorial claim on Mongolia as late as 1955). AnonMoos (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC) :AnonMoos Thanks for the usefull details, then I was wrongPopolon (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paris IV-Rue Simon-le-Franc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lophotrochozoa (talk) 19:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Gol_Mod has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Latebird (talk) 12:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking of discussion page

[edit]

Please do revert your partial blanking (intentional or unintentional) of this discussion page. Thanks,--Tiger Chair (talk) 14:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the remak, don't know how that's happen, I reverted my change and added my text at the end.Popolon (talk) 14:16, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks,--Tiger Chair (talk) 14:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Hi. This picture that you included into Category:Kashk; can you tell me where can I find the kashk in the image? Is it an ingredient of some cookie? --E4024 (talk) 12:49, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: . Yes several use drained milk (yellow one, and I'm not sure (that was 3 years ago), white one too), there are common in Inner-Mongolia, and are eat with salted milk tea. strangely a friend from outer-Mongolia (so called Mongolia state today), didn't know this kind of candies when I give her some in Paris.Popolon (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
With all the due respect, if it is not visible in the image, I think the cat should be removed. Of course when we categorize a statue we may add the cat of the sculptor, even if s/he is not in the image; but this case is like adding "category salt" to a dish image, because it has salt in it. (I know I'm exaggerating, but exaggerating sometimes helps to see things more clearly. :) If you agree with me, please remove the cat. If you don't, then you dont. Ciao. --E4024 (talk) 16:23, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@E4024: . You can find some of this products here for reference : https://www.jd.com/chanpin/2156896.html (酸奶奶干 means dried milk/&sour milk/yogurt, the term is the same for both in chinese). I will add a description on the picture. I see one of the whites one in this page, so it confirm that's also dried yogurt.Popolon (talk) 16:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

[edit]
Je vous souhaite un Joyeux Noël et une bonne et heureuse année 2019. --Pierre André (talk) 16:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sarah Krichen WMFr: , @VIGNERON: , c'est déjà assez pénible d'avoir les bannières qui s'affiche avec retard (dans Firefox, dans le cas d'un ordi ralentit) sur les pages de Wikipédia fr, et qui se retrouve sous la souris au moment où l'on veut cliquer sur un lien en haut de page (similaire au téléphone très ralentit où l'on ne clique pas où on veut). Ça n'est peut-être pas indispensable d'en rajouter... Ne le prenez pas pour vous ;). Popolon (talk) 22:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:500-Tögrög-Ger Tereg.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:500-Tögrög-Ger Tereg.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

留級

[edit]

你好, quelqu’un a enlevé la page《留級》sur Wiktionnaire, pouvez-vous la recréer SVP? 138.229.19.202 23:18, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

多謝!Je suis content. 138.229.19.202 23:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

En cantonais, on dit aussi « 留班 ». 138.229.19.202 23:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Parce que la personne savait que j’étais Fête. Fête est bloqué. 138.229.19.202 23:52, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Et il m’a enlevé même les API québécois du mot « mayonnaise », l’un est le son « ail » l’autre est « eil », pouvez-vous les remettre quand vous serez libre SVP? 138.229.19.202 00:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Je ne connais pas cette partie désolé, qui à fait ça et pourquoi ? Il y a des trucs pas très propre sur le Wiktionary, certains s'en plaignaient sur Wikipedia il y a bien 5 ou 10 ans déjà.Popolon (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Même si vous connaissez pas, si vous trouvez que les 2 prononciations québécoises est pareilles, ça veut dire que c'est le même API. 138.229.19.202 12:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
J'aurais du noter les noms des personnes qui ont supprimé avant de recréer :(.Popolon (talk) 16:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, cette IP est un global ban depuis le Wiktionnaire. Merci de ne pas suivre ses demandes. Ses compétences en prononciation et en description ont été avérées nulles. Merci. Lyokoï (talk) 23:48, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Lyokoï: , je n'ai pas suivi l'affaire, et n'ai pas assez de connaissance en québecois mais en tout cas, ce qu'il a mis en avant en chinois était exact. Ça ne paraît pas improbable du peu que j'entendu du québecois. Est-ce que vous avez un lien vers le débat ? Popolon (talk) 23:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Tout est là : User:Fête. Lyokoï (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

[edit]

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 15:19, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Photographer's Barnstar
Merci beaucoup for your early photos of Canton! -- RZuo (talk) 15:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Château Mont-Royal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]