User talk:Yuval CT/Archive-9
————————————————٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶————————————————
Gustaw1410 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Do you really think it is a good idea to transform the first block of a user into an indefinite block? Blocks should be gradual, so unless you have other reasons that I don't see, I suggest you revise the duration... --Eusebius (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- All of the user's contributions are copyright violations, some of them includes the copyright tag. It seems a lot crucial than uploading files with incomplete information, and it feels that if the user was free by tomorrow, the next uploads would be copyvios as well. Yuval Y § Chat § 17:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but you cannot just suppose that this user will never change and that he must be kept at large from Commons forever. You can't just ban a user for his first block, it's just wrong! We, as admins, have failed to spot the copyvios, and they have remained for months, but he received his first warning only two weeks ago (and we may have failed again by not blocking him for a small duration in the last days). Again, please reconsider. --Eusebius (talk) 18:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- As you requested I've switched it back to one day block, but something tells me there's no need to revert the infinite block warning... Yuval Y § Chat § 20:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I'll be watching him anyway. --Eusebius (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- You welcome :-) Yuval Y § Chat § 21:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. I'll be watching him anyway. --Eusebius (talk) 21:20, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- As you requested I've switched it back to one day block, but something tells me there's no need to revert the infinite block warning... Yuval Y § Chat § 20:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but you cannot just suppose that this user will never change and that he must be kept at large from Commons forever. You can't just ban a user for his first block, it's just wrong! We, as admins, have failed to spot the copyvios, and they have remained for months, but he received his first warning only two weeks ago (and we may have failed again by not blocking him for a small duration in the last days). Again, please reconsider. --Eusebius (talk) 18:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Marketlligent Logo
[edit]The logo used in the page marketelligent is the official logo if the company. What to do to avoid the deletion??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zishan86 (talk • contribs) 06:53, April 24, 2009 (UTC)
- If you're sure you want everyone to use your company logo everywhere, then you'd better fill the release form. Since I'm almost sure you only want to use it on the article in Wikipedia, the best way is to upload the image directly to the Wikipedia - using one of the logo sections. Yuval Y § Chat § 08:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- And one more thing - do sign your messages using ~~~~. Yuval Y § Chat § 08:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Copyvio
[edit]Hi,
Could you have a look at here. The photos with copyvio which you deleted yesterday are uploaded again. İyivikiler... ho? ni! 17:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- I've deleted the previous deleted images, donno about the rest... Yuval Y § Chat § 18:13, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- תּוֹדָה רַבָּה İyivikiler... ho? ni! 18:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- You welcome size hoş geldiniz (?) Yuval Y § Chat § 18:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- :) Nice try but that's the other "welcome", the one you say when someone comes to you. The right phrase would be "rica ederim." Well, thank you anyway. İyivikiler... ho? ni! 18:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- Well, that's google translation of "You welcome"... at least I know how to welcome you if you'd come to visit Yuval Y § Chat § 18:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- :) Nice try but that's the other "welcome", the one you say when someone comes to you. The right phrase would be "rica ederim." Well, thank you anyway. İyivikiler... ho? ni! 18:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- You welcome size hoş geldiniz (?) Yuval Y § Chat § 18:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
- תּוֹדָה רַבָּה İyivikiler... ho? ni! 18:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
About File:Ta3deel el makalaat.png
[edit]Hello Yuval, About my file Ta3deel el makalaat.png, I don't understand where is the problem. I'm the developer of this image, and the star that I've used is GNU file, you can find its source here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crystal_Clear_action_viewmag_with_a_star.png
or here
http://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%84%D9%81:Crystal_Clear_action_viewmag_with_a_star.png
Sorry I've removed the "No Permission" Template cause It make the file looks bad
Please tell me what I've mistaken in the license Thanks Ali Saeed (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- You haven't made the entire image - it was based on File:Crystal Clear action viewmag with a star.png, so I've added the name of the image, together with the proper license tag for that images. Yuval Y § Chat § 20:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I really didn't get this "Adding the license of File:Crystal Clear action viewmag with a star.png" , thanks for your help. :)Ali Saeed (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- It came with the original images... Yuval Y § Chat § 22:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
3 images by Crucifixion
[edit]I was wondering about these 3 images by Crucifixion.
All 3 images have no date given at all...unlike other more legitimate images by this suspicious user. I checked TinEye and I see the first image may have come from here: [1]
- You have to scroll down the web page a little and look to your left. (the question is whether the image existed before Crucifixion first uploaded it onto Commons?) Regarding the second and third images, as I note there is no date offered by Crucifixion and the resolution is very small and there is zero metadata to show if they were scanned from an existing photo. They look like possible copy vios. Have you examined the third and final image of Khufu. There is a black and white background around this statue as if it was cropped or scanned from an existing image and the resolution is SUPER small. (these appear to be like the highlights of a copy vio again)
What do you think? I have to go now as its 2:35 AM here in Canada. But please examine the images and consider if you think the uploader is the actual copyright holder or not. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- I've checked the user's contributions and talk page... According to Commons:Deletion_requests/Contributions_of_User:Crucifixion and Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Amenhet.jpg I do suspect of a massive copyright violation. Especially when the user's reply for all the warnings in its talk page, was to remove them. I guess we could block the user, but the question is what to do with all the images... Yuval Y § Chat § 11:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Some of this user's images have legit (camera) metadata...but these three above have nothing. I think they should be deleted. Given the super low resolution for image 2 and 3, its likely a copy vio. As for number 1, you can slap a copy vio or 'no permissions since' tag on it.
- All 3 images have no metadata...which tells you something unlike say these legitimate images by the same user with high resolution: File:PtolSmash 212.jpg, File:PictureRam 387.jpg & File:Luckyscarab370.jpg (note the camera: Olympus) So, he was likely in Egypt a few years ago and took some pictures, but he was not in the Louvre to take the first image (or the other 2 images I mentioned above) Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest that someone more professional would check the images. The user had permission issues in the past. Yuval Y § Chat § 15:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. Crucifixion left Commons long ago and won't reply to any messages. It looks like only a professional can decide which is legitimate and which are copy vios by him now sadly. Please contact someone here. The only person I know is you and Lewis Collard. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Crucifixion (talk • contribs) -- Seems as the best solution. Yuval Y § Chat § 20:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thank You. I have made a reply there...and someone has acted! By the way, if you like native or European art, I have placed my own images here on my userpage I also have some pictures of the city of White Rock on the sea. You can view them...if you want. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello Yuval;
I am following up to the message I just received from you regarding the Image "What_Animal_Are_You_-_With_Header.JPG" I am not offended at you sending me a message as I rather fully understand what needs to be done to make sure everything is right. I had Carmine Marinaro send a message with the permission to use the image yesterday afternoon - Ticket#2009051510038844] Permission to Use Image on Wikipedia - File: What_Animal_Are_You_-_With_Header.JPG - to Permissions - Wikimedia Commons [permissions-commons@wikimedia.org]. Was this not received? I am sorry if I am not / or have not followed all of the proper steps. I am looking forward to your reply and guidance.
Best regards,
Careeranimals (talk) 18:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Fabrizzio P Busso-Campana / CareerAnimals18:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
- The permission had been received, but I can't tell how to categorize the image... Yuval Y § Chat § 22:49, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
File:Esc_son.jpg
[edit]Check this: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Esc_son.jpg
Yes, this is the readable version.
Why have you deleted my images?
[edit]I would like to know why and what gives you the right to do so? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AJzero (talk • contribs)
- My duty as an administator is to protect the copyrights. I know sometimes it feels as we're pour the water with the baby, but with all the copyright violations, there are some ways to make sure that the copyright holders would not be hurt. I've sent you an email, and I hope things would be better now. Yuval Y § Chat § 17:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
The change you've made in "gay pride of Jerusalem"
[edit]Hi. Please see my note in File talk:Sagol Jerusalem 08.jpg. thanks, Danny. Danny-w (talk) 15:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]please see my request at [2]. Thanks, 212.199.200.76 13:10, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- These too: [3], [4]. Thanks, Yoni 212.199.200.76 13:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
These are my requests. Its pretty annoying that I have to re-enter my p/w even though I have a global account. Yonidebest Ω Talk 13:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
לא'דע למה החיבור הגלובאלי לא ממש פעיל. נסה לבדוק בהגדרות - איכשהו סידרתי שיחבר אותי אוטומטית בכל הוויקימהשמם... לגבי התמונות - אני מצטער אבל אני לא רואה כרגע סיבה להגן על התמונות. אני שם אותן ברשימת המעקב שלי, וברגע שיהיה משהו, אמהר לשחזר. מעבר לכך, הלוגו של ערך מומלץ הוא לא gif שקוף? אגב, אם תרצה, אני יכול לנסות להכין gif יפה יותר, בלי רקע לבן.
Yuval Y § Chat § 13:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- יש לנו חכם חנוכה שיכול לעשות בעיות נוראיות ואתה לא נמצא כאן 24/7 כדי לנטר אחר. גם דקה אחת עם סמל נאצי זה לא רצוי בעליל. אנא הגן על התמונות. אם אתה לא מוכן להגן, אעלה אותם לוויקיפדיה ואגן עליהם בעצמי. הלוגו הנוכחי בסדר גמור ונראה מצוין בכל הדפדפנים. לכן, אני לא רואה צורך בתמונה אחרת עם רקע שקוף שעלול או לא עלול לגרום לבעיות עיצוביות בדפדפנים מסוימים. Yonidebest Ω Talk 13:43, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- אוקי אוקיי... מצאתי גם תבנית מתאימה.. אגן על התמונות בעוד רגע... Yuval Y § Chat § 13:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, Yonidebest Ω Talk 13:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Pleasure... Any more images to protect? Seems as the {{Enwiki main page}} is heavily used... Yuval Y § Chat § 13:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
.יובל, ראה אם אתה יכול לעשות משהו עם הטיפוס שמתעסק עם התמונה של רפאלי Gridge (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2009 (UTC).
- רשמתי לו אזהרה. במידה וימשיך הוא ייחסם Yuval Y § Chat § 15:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Multatuli - Ideeën III.djvu
[edit]I anwered to you on File talk:Multatuli - Ideeën III.djvu. Since I think it's quite an important topic, I notice you on your talk page as well :). Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 02:02, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
...
[edit]יובל, ייתכן שאמיר גלעד יבקש למחוק את תמונותיו. אני מתנגד. אני מציין זאת רק כי לא אהיה זמין לטיפול בנושא בזמן הקרוב. רשום את התנגדותי. אני מצטער, אבל לא אוכל להרחיב כעת. אביעד Gridge (talk) 19:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC).
- אני גם לא בעד להעלים את התמונות, אבל אם הוא יתעקש, כנראה שנצטרך לוותר על התמונות. אשמח לדבר איתו להבין מה קורה..
- Yuval Y § Chat § 20:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- יובל, אני טרחתי רבות בעניין הזה וגם ערכתי עשרות מתמונותיו. אני מתנגד בתוקף למחיקת התמונות. אני מזכיר לך שלא ניתן למחוק תמונות ללא דיון, בוודאי לא כאשר ישנה התנגדות. כרגע אני במקום בו אין לי גישה סדירה לאינטרנט ואני מבקש התחשבות. Gridge (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC).
- אני גם טרחתי רבות על תמונותיו, ואין לך מושג כמה שזה סיוט להוריד רקע מתמונות וכיוצא באלה... נראה לי שמחר אתקשר אליו... אם הוא לא היה גר באילת הייתי מגיע אליו אישית :p --Yuval Y § Chat § 21:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- אולי עדיף שלא תאמר לו דבר. אם הוא לא עשה שום צעד, אולי חזר בו ושכח מהעניין. Gridge (talk) 17:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC).
- גם זה יתאים לו --Yuval Y § Chat § 20:27, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- אולי עדיף שלא תאמר לו דבר. אם הוא לא עשה שום צעד, אולי חזר בו ושכח מהעניין. Gridge (talk) 17:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC).
- אני גם טרחתי רבות על תמונותיו, ואין לך מושג כמה שזה סיוט להוריד רקע מתמונות וכיוצא באלה... נראה לי שמחר אתקשר אליו... אם הוא לא היה גר באילת הייתי מגיע אליו אישית :p --Yuval Y § Chat § 21:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
- יובל, אני טרחתי רבות בעניין הזה וגם ערכתי עשרות מתמונותיו. אני מתנגד בתוקף למחיקת התמונות. אני מזכיר לך שלא ניתן למחוק תמונות ללא דיון, בוודאי לא כאשר ישנה התנגדות. כרגע אני במקום בו אין לי גישה סדירה לאינטרנט ואני מבקש התחשבות. Gridge (talk) 16:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC).
TUSC token 0579d64ac60b7cbebf0f7089a7d3a0e2
[edit]Forgot my password..
Notre Dame de Namur University
[edit]Thakns for handling the Notre Dame de Namur University images so expeditiously, and even more for following through here and on Wikipedia with the other images and with finding a replacement. That's above and beyond the job description. Good work. Will Beback (talk) 19:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Yuval Y § Chat § 20:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)