An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 1920 (2015), was a 2015 decision by the United States Supreme Court pertaining to the standard for induced patent infringement. Writing for a 6-2 majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy held that (1) a claim of induced infringement requires a showing that the defendant knew that it is engaging in infringing conduct and (2) a defendant's belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to a claim of induced infringement. Justice Antonin Scalia dissented from the second point, arguing that, in his view, a good faith belief in a patent's invalidity should constitute a defense to a charge of induced infringement.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 1920 (2015), was a 2015 decision by the United States Supreme Court pertaining to the standard for induced patent infringement. Writing for a 6-2 majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy held that (1) a claim of induced infringement requires a showing that the defendant knew that it is engaging in infringing conduct and (2) a defendant's belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to a claim of induced infringement. Justice Antonin Scalia dissented from the second point, arguing that, in his view, a good faith belief in a patent's invalidity should constitute a defense to a charge of induced infringement. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 68478457 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 11316 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1096394129 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:arguedate
  • 0001-03-31 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear
  • 2015 (xsd:integer)
dbp:decidedate
  • 0001-05-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear
  • 2015 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent
  • Scalia (en)
dbp:docket
  • 13 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname
  • Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (en)
dbp:joindissent
  • Roberts (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Ginsburg, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
dbp:lawsapplied
  • 35 (xsd:integer)
dbp:litigants
  • Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (en)
dbp:majority
  • Kennedy (en)
dbp:oralargument
dbp:parallelcitations
  • 135 (xsd:integer)
dbp:uspage
  • 632 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol
  • 575 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 1920 (2015), was a 2015 decision by the United States Supreme Court pertaining to the standard for induced patent infringement. Writing for a 6-2 majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy held that (1) a claim of induced infringement requires a showing that the defendant knew that it is engaging in infringing conduct and (2) a defendant's belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to a claim of induced infringement. Justice Antonin Scalia dissented from the second point, arguing that, in his view, a good faith belief in a patent's invalidity should constitute a defense to a charge of induced infringement. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
foaf:name
  • Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License