dbo:abstract
|
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (1955), was an important income tax case before the United States Supreme Court. The Court held as follows:
* Congress, in enacting income taxation statutes that comprehend "gains or profits and income derived from any source whatever," intended to tax all gain except that which was specifically exempted.
* Income is not limited to "the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined."
* Although the Court used this characterization in Eisner v. Macomber, it "was not meant to provide a touchstone to all future gross income questions."
* Instead, income is realized whenever there are "instances of [1] undeniable accessions to wealth, [2] clearly realized, and [3] over which the taxpayers have complete dominion."
* Under this definition, punitive damages qualify as "income" -- even though they are not derived from capital or from labor. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 6059 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-02-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
|
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., (en)
|
dbp:courtlistener
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-03-28 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glenshaw Glass Company (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- The Court held that Congress, in enacting the income taxation statutes, intended to tax all gain except that which was specifically exempted. (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Burton, Clark, Minton (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
|
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. (en)
|
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:notparticipating
| |
dbp:openjurist
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
| |
dbp:subsequent
| |
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dct:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (1955), was an important income tax case before the United States Supreme Court. The Court held as follows:
* Congress, in enacting income taxation statutes that comprehend "gains or profits and income derived from any source whatever," intended to tax all gain except that which was specifically exempted.
* Income is not limited to "the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined."
* Although the Court used this characterization in Eisner v. Macomber, it "was not meant to provide a touchstone to all future gross income questions."
* Instead, income is realized whenever there are "instances of [1] undeniable accessions to wealth, [2] clearly realized, and [3] over which the taxpayers have complete dominion."
* Under this (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glenshaw Glass Company (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |