| dbo:abstract
|
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that anti-indecency provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling on the regulation of materials distributed via the Internet. (en)
- レノ対アメリカ自由人権協会事件（レノたいアメリカじゆうじんけんきょうかいじけん、英: Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union）, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)は、1996年の通信品位法（CDA）の反みだらな表現規定が、合衆国憲法修正第1条の表現の自由の保障に違反しており、無効であるとアメリカ合衆国最高裁判所が満場一致で裁定した事件。2人の判事が部分的に同意し、部分的に決定に異議を唱えた。これは、インターネットを介して配布される資料の規制に関する最初の主要な最高裁判決だった。 (ja)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 11634 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-03-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:courtlistener
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, et al. v. American Civil Liberties Union, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The Internet is entitled to the full protection that is given to other forms of media like the printed press or television and the special factors that justify governmental regulations of media broadcasts do not apply in this case. Except for child pornography or obscenity, the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is unenforceable when applied to its anti-decency measures since such provisions are overbroad. Section 502 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is unconstitutional because it violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. (en)
|
| dbp:joinconcurrence/dissent
| |
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
|
- U.S. Const. amend. I; (en)
|
| dbp:litigants
|
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- Prelim. injunction granted ; expedited review by S.Ct. per CDA §561 (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, unanimously ruling that anti-indecency provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violated the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling on the regulation of materials distributed via the Internet. (en)
- レノ対アメリカ自由人権協会事件（レノたいアメリカじゆうじんけんきょうかいじけん、英: Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union）, 521 U.S. 844 (1997)は、1996年の通信品位法（CDA）の反みだらな表現規定が、合衆国憲法修正第1条の表現の自由の保障に違反しており、無効であるとアメリカ合衆国最高裁判所が満場一致で裁定した事件。2人の判事が部分的に同意し、部分的に決定に異議を唱えた。これは、インターネットを介して配布される資料の規制に関する最初の主要な最高裁判決だった。 (ja)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- レノ対アメリカ自由人権協会事件 (ja)
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Janet Reno,Attorney General of the United States, et al. v.American Civil Liberties Union, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
