| dbo:abstract
|
- Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 (1972), is a Supreme Court of the United States case on the issue of standing under the Administrative Procedure Act. The Court rejected a lawsuit by the Sierra Club seeking to block the development of a ski resort at Mineral King valley in the Sierra Nevada Mountains because the club had not alleged any injury. The case prompted a famous dissent by Justice William O. Douglas suggesting that in response to ecological concerns, environmental objects (such as a valley, an alpine meadow, a river, or a lake) should be granted legal personhood by the public. (en)
- 시에라 대 모턴 사건(405 U.S. 727 (1972))은 유명 미국 연방 대법원 판례로 환경소송에서 당사자적격을 다룬 사건이다. 원고 은 미국의 유명 환경단체이다. (ko)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 20996 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-11-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Sierra Club v. Morton, (en)
|
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-04-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Douglas (en)
- Brennan (en)
- Blackmun (en)
|
| dbp:findlaw
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Sierra Club v. Rogers Clark Ballard Morton, Secretary of the Interior, et al. (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- A person has standing to seek judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act only if he can show that he himself has suffered or will suffer injury, whether economic or otherwise. In this case, where petitioner asserted no individualized harm to itself or its members, it lacked standing to maintain the action. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Burger, White, Marshall (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Sierra Club v. Morton (en)
|
| dbp:loc
| |
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:notparticipating
|
- Powell and Rehnquist (en)
|
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
| |
| dbp:subsequent
|
- Sierra Club v. Morton, 348 F. Supp. 219, (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 (1972), is a Supreme Court of the United States case on the issue of standing under the Administrative Procedure Act. The Court rejected a lawsuit by the Sierra Club seeking to block the development of a ski resort at Mineral King valley in the Sierra Nevada Mountains because the club had not alleged any injury. The case prompted a famous dissent by Justice William O. Douglas suggesting that in response to ecological concerns, environmental objects (such as a valley, an alpine meadow, a river, or a lake) should be granted legal personhood by the public. (en)
- 시에라 대 모턴 사건(405 U.S. 727 (1972))은 유명 미국 연방 대법원 판례로 환경소송에서 당사자적격을 다룬 사건이다. 원고 은 미국의 유명 환경단체이다. (ko)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Sierra Club v. Morton (en)
- 시에라 대 모턴 사건 (ko)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Sierra Clubv.Rogers Clark Ballard Morton, Secretary of the Interior, et al. (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
