About: Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. 69 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. 69 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-815_qol1.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/571/12-815/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20120904092 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_815/argument https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-815
dbo:wikiPageID	43182037 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	6491 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1093953019 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbc:2013_in_United_States_case_law dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Eighth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District_of_Iowa dbr:Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2002) dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Windstream_Communications dbr:Iowa_Utilities_Board dbr:8th_Cir. dbr:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996 dbc:United_States_federal_jurisdiction_case_law dbr:Abstention_doctrine dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:Sprint_Corporation dbr:Sprint_Corporation dbc:United_States_communications_regulation_case_law dbr:Younger_v._Harris dbr:Voice_over_IP dbr:F.3d
dbp:arguedate	0001-11-05 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-12-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:docket	12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	Sprint Communications Inc., Petitioner v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs et al. (en)
dbp:holding	Federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. Eighth Circuit reversed and remanded. (en)
dbp:joinmajority	unanimous (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/571/12-815/
dbp:litigants	Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs (en)
dbp:majority	Ginsburg (en)
dbp:oralargument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_815/argument
dbp:otherSource	Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-815_qol1.pdf
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-815
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior	25920.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:uspage	69 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	571 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Better_source dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cn dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Refimprove dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:Sprint
dct:subject	dbc:2013_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_federal_jurisdiction_case_law dbc:Sprint_Corporation dbc:United_States_communications_regulation_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment	Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs, 571 U.S. 69 (2013), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court in which a unanimous Court held that federal court abstention under the Younger v. Harris doctrine is not in order simply because a pending state-court proceeding involves the same subject matter. The case involved a dispute between Sprint Corporation and Windstream Communications. (en)
rdfs:label	Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs yago-res:Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs wikidata:Sprint Communications, Inc. v. Jacobs https://global.dbpedia.org/id/kXs3
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs?oldid=1093953019&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs
foaf:name	(en) Sprint Communications Inc., Petitioner v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v_Jacobs
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Verizon_Communications_Inc._v._FCC_(2002) dbr:Iowa_Utilities_Board dbr:Telecommunications_Act_of_1996 dbr:Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v_Jacobs
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Sprint_Communications,_Inc._v._Jacobs