Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attila Császár (footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . ✗plicit 14:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Attila Császár (footballer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His professional football career lasted all of 44 mins and, in any case, WP:FPL is no longer the relevant standard. I am not seeing any evidence of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC being met. Best sources seem to be Csornai SE, which is not WP:RS, Dunaújváros, a mere squad list mention, and Papa ma, which is trivial match report coverage. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Hungary. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO. No sources and two primary ELs. BEFORE showed nothing that meets IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV). // Timothy :: talk 16:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. Jogurney (talk) 18:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 22:07, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.