Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carey Dorn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If an editor wants to work on this article in Draft space, contact me or go to WP:REFUND. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:39, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Carey Dorn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failure of WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United States of America. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:48, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 13:20, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has extensive third person sources to justify notability. Dwanyewest (talk) 03:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwanyewest: Could you please point out which sources specifically offer significant coverage? Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify, at worst. AfD initiated two days after creation and while the article was being improved. Due to their career's timeframe, online search results might not be indicative of the subject's notability or lack thereof. Let the editors already working on the article deal with passing AfC instead of failing AfD. -Socccc (talk) 15:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Dwanyewest. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 13:39, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Das osmnezz: what’s your rationale for keeping? You are providing none, just like Dwanyewest, who did not provide any example of sourcing that passes GNG. The delete argument is currently stronger. Paul Vaurie (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul Vaurie: So coverage in Soccer America, CBC Sports, The New York Times and The Hartford Courant aren't credible sources to make this article notable? Dwanyewest (talk) 12:16, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwanyewest: Could you please point out what sources specifically present significant coverage as per GNG? Paul Vaurie (talk) 16:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 16:11, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - currently, keep arguments have not demonstrated that a single source qualifies the subject as passing GNG. Deletion arguments stand stronger as of now. Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:14, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a WP:GNG failure. The sources cited by "Keep" proponents above are almost exclusively passing mentions, which briefly mention Dorn's name as part of articles about the CyberRays as a whole. The only exceptions are primary sources associated with the CyberRays themselves, which also do not contribute to GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Dorn played in the first season of women's professional football in the United States, and she was a regular as the club won the league. I would've expected more coverage for a player with that background, but I'm not finding it (I'm only finding routine or superficial stuff like these: [1], [2]). Jogurney (talk) 21:33, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.