Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Momiji (Ninja Gaiden)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to List of Ninja Gaiden characters. Star Mississippi 02:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Momiji (Ninja Gaiden)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's entire reception section is quite literally nothing but listicles, failing SIGCOV and showing no signs of notability on its own. It's basically a typical Niemti article, just with even less meat on the bone. Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Redirect I cannot find any Sigcov per WP:Before. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 15:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - It would be a great help if someone could recreate List of Ninja Gaiden characters and add some sources to make it viable as a list. It would be perfect if targeted there. Sexiness/unsexiness is a pretty bad metric for establishing notability, unless scholars have specifically discussed that aspect of the character. There does not seem to be significant coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. That's a horrible way to measure notability. But, unfortunately like you said if reliable sources talk about it it counts. Blitzfan51 speak to the manager 20:04, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It should be distinguished between "talking about it" in a critical sense - i.e. analyzing thematic significance/commercial impact of their attractiveness - or just saying "this person is sexiest". The latter can potentially run up against WP:INDISCRIMINATE if there is no evidence they are important outside of that. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, but only upon the creation of the aforementioned proposed list. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:09, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why not merge it into the Dead or Alive character list, since it's the same continuity? If Rachel were merged it would go there as well.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.