Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Sullivan (author)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:31, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Sullivan (author)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Something is going on with Sullivans notability; either he's barely notable, or he's not notable at all. The sources in the article are questionable at best, the sources found on Google/DuckDuckGo similarly leave something to be desired. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 17:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, and California. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 17:44, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - looks very promotional, no substantial biographical sourcing, no evidence of notability in the third-party sources, a REFBOMB of primary sources and it's by an SPA. It would need much more third-party evidence of Sullivan's notability as a person before a BLP could safely be on Wikipedia - David Gerard (talk) 18:33, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:RS - the sources are all by the subject, or blogs. There are no reliable sources about this person. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.