Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T&S Communications
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Procedural keep. Just on a quick read of the nom's previous nominations and their votes! in AfD, they seem to either be using LLMs to create their rationales, or poorly using examples in AfD FAQs to construct very weak and paraphrased rationales (I've also reverted several of their edits where they're not actually previewing very poor edits before clicking publish). @Jiaoriballisse:, future nominations must be constructed fully in your own words, using your actual keyboard (and not Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V) to state your reason for deletion.
As for this nom, just copying WP:RS is unacceptable, and I'm closing it based on there being no elaboration on why T&S's article should be deleted specifically. No prejudice to a proper nomination. Nate • (chatter) 23:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Nate • (chatter) 23:48, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- T&S Communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
due to concerns over notability and reliance on insufficiently independent sources. Wikipedia’s guidelines require significant coverage from reputable, secondary sources that demonstrate independent, in-depth reporting on the subject. However, if the article largely depends on primary sources, company-provided information, or promotional material, it lacks the unbiased, independent verification necessary to establish notability. Additionally, without documented, unique contributions or significant industry recognition that sets it apart from other companies, T&S Communications may not meet the standards for a standalone article Jiaoriballisse (talk) 09:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jiaoriballisse (talk) 09:38, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Jiaoriballisse: Please don't use AI to create discussions – use your own words to explain your reasoning. — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 11:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:37, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
