User contributions for Ncondee

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

02:1402:14, 16 January 2023 diff hist +3 m Sam Brinton corrected pronouns (they use they/them pronouns, not he/him) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

16:3816:38, 29 September 2022 diff hist +4 m The Princess and the Queen (House of the Dragon) Fixed typo (wrong name) and grammar (subject-object ambiguity) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

16:1416:14, 19 September 2022 diff hist +1 House of the Dragon →Episodes

15:0915:09, 1 August 2022 diff hist +1 m Fear Street (film series) Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

04:2604:26, 5 March 2022 diff hist 0 m The Weekend Away →Plot: fixing a grammatical mistake where subject and object are confused, suggesting that the accuser was being accused, and not the other way around.

01:2201:22, 14 September 2021 diff hist 0 Kate (film) No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
01:2101:21, 14 September 2021 diff hist +177 m Kate (film) No edit summary Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit

20:5720:57, 22 August 2021 diff hist +41 Phantom aid in Afghanistan →Afghanistan: The page incorrectly describes Lessons Learned as a confidential report, when in reality it is an agency program that has published a dozen unclassified reports. The page also incorrectly attributes the 40 percent estimate to a report, rather than an estimate by an interviewee.
20:5420:54, 22 August 2021 diff hist +12 War in Afghanistan (2001–2021) →Criticism of costs: The page incorrectly describes Lessons Learned as a classified report. In reality, it is a program that has produced a dozen reports, all of which are unclassified. It also cites the 40 percent estimate as coming from the agency's report, when it was actually estimated by an interviewee.
03:0103:01, 22 August 2021 diff hist +58 Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction →Investigations: Tweaking a linking error.
03:0103:01, 22 August 2021 diff hist +25 Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction →Investigations: The page incorrectly presents an agency program as an "initiative," and attributes the misrepresentation of facts pertaining to the war in Afghanistan to SIGAR, rather than to U.S. officials who misled the American public.
02:5602:56, 22 August 2021 diff hist +62 Afghanistan Papers →Initial reporting in The Washington Post: The page incorrectly described the papers as being part of a report called "Lessons Learned." In reality, SIGAR has a Lessons Learned Program which has produced nearly a dozen reports, each of which cite these interviews. The page also incorrectly attributed the 40 percent estimate to a report, rather than an interviewee. The record of interview includes that estimate.
02:5002:50, 22 August 2021 diff hist +8 Afghanistan Papers The "papers" themselves were records of interview conducted by the office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. To call them assessments is misleading; it is a series of interviews with policymakers who provided assessments, but the documents themselves are records of interviews.
02:4702:47, 22 August 2021 diff hist −1 Craig Whitlock →Other important works: The Afghanistan Papers were NOT classified documents, otherwise they would be legally unreleasable under FOIA guidelines. They were internal unclassified documents. And the main focus of the Afghanistan Papers was not that the U.S. government sought to hide these papers, but rather what the papers themselves revealed.

12:1712:17, 20 March 2011 diff hist +25 Obama Doctrine No edit summary

16:0016:00, 24 January 2011 diff hist −88 m Alfred Ploetz Copy edit of poorly-phrased text. I cannot verify the information, but no new information was added. The page is just as (in)accurate as before (hence the inclusion of unreferenced citation)