Talk:Anna Kavan

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Son's death

Currently it merely says "In 1944, Kavan’s son from her first marriage was killed". I appreciate that the article is about Anna not her son, but a little more detail would be in order if it can be sourced. At least whether he was killed in action, accident or foul play. Ϣere SpielChequers 17:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I found the required details and have published it on the page. Hope that is enough. Nickjohndoe (talk) 16:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bazooka

while the word was invented in the thirties for a musical instrument, it probably didn't gain its forceful meeting until the forties and its use for an anti tank weapon. so it looks odd to me to describe her using it from years before the word was known to have been coined. Would later call her "Bazooka". sounds more plausible to me. Anyone have the sources to check? Ϣere SpielChequers 23:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Including the Archival discussion

I’m afraid I have to disagree with you about this. There is a link at the bottom of the page to the website that this information is taken from, which can be followed by those who have a specialist interest in archival research. This type of information is not included on wiki pages for most other authors. If you look at the page for Virginia Woolf, for example, archives are included in the links at the bottom of the page there. I really feel that including too much irrelevant information is off-putting for readers and I am genuinely keen to make this page as interesting and exciting as possible for anyone with a general interest in Anna Kavan. The research is obviously useful – in fact I compiled that information and wrote the original page it was lifted from, but I think 99.9% of wiki readers will not want to see it. Can I persuade you to think again about this? It would be great if we could agree or find a compromise here. Thanks VCWalker (talk) 18:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC) 15 October 2015[reply]

@VCWalker: I am still not understanding why we shouldn't be supporting that 1+% of readers who are coming to Wikipedia to figure out how to start research on a topic. Its not like the information is being forced on anyone early in the article: most readers stop reading in the first couple sections anyway. Wikipedia is becoming the first place for experts to start their research: and it would be a real shame, that they didn't figure out where the archival materials are in that first stop. There are plenty of articles that include this kind of material: for example, Gordon_Parks#Other_sources, and we even have whole articles that include this kind of information: List of Australian WWI diarists, and Shakespeare_Apocrypha.

Moreover, there is a whole body of research on how Archives have added links, citations and discussion of their collections to create increased public interest in those collections (see the articles here, for example). There is no reason not to bring the articles towards a scholarly level of review of the relevant source material: including the archival material. Remember, WP:Wikipedia is not paper, so there are no limits on the way in which we expand this information. The problem is that we haven't had enough experts (like yourself or myself) who have spent the time collecting this information for our public, much less organizing in a useful format. I think there is room for disagreement on how this information is represented, but there is no question that it fits our scope and should be included in the article. Sadads (talk) 15:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@VCWalker: I just wanted to reach out to you and make sure that you got a chance to review the feedback/response. I would be very happy to work with you to make the information more accessible for outside readers, and hope you keep contributing about both Anna Kavan and other topics, Sadads (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anna Kavan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anna Kavan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

help with non-sensical sentences

The article says "An inveterate traveller, Kavan initiated a long journey at the outset of World War II. From September 1939 to February 1943, she spent six months in Carmel-by-the-Sea, California in 1940" This makes no sense. Perhaps this should be "An inveterate traveller, Kavan initiated a long journey at the outset of World War II, from September 1939 to February 1943. She spent six months in Carmel-by-the-Sea, California in 1940." Can someone with access to sources fix this? Thanks! Doctormatt (talk) 03:10, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]