Jump to content

Talk:Chestnut-vented nuthatch/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 05:16, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted
Removed
Attempted
  • In Yunnan nuthatch, you used Éric Pasquet, but here you use Eric Pasquet – which is correct?
I corrected the name on the Yunnan nuthatch. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:1039:C4D2:8092:F4BC (talk) 22:33, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • "All species in the europaea group build their nest entrances" → Is this relevant here?
Removed
  • Voisin → first name
Replaced into "Jean-François"
  • "In the male, the back of the flanks is an intense brick red, contrasting with the red of the undertail, when it is as red as in the female" → Do you mean when it is less red in the female or something?
Reworded
  • "parotid region" → Link or provide an in-parentheses explanation of what parotid is.
Linked from wikitionary
  • "tremolo" → Link or provide an in-parentheses explanation.
Linked
  • "generally takes place from March to May" → Where?
In Thailand, added it.
  • A lot of the Tits, Nuthatches and Treecreepers references are duplicated. Make one reference for pages 114–116, and one for page 143. Also, I'm pretty sure that the title here is incorrect, Replace it with Chickadees, Tits, Nuthatches & Treecreepers.
Done. I always forgot that those 2 titles are different. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:E5E5:3906:820:3691 (talk) 07:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ENGVAR

[edit]

Why would a species of bird originally described by a British naturalist and native to SE Asia be written in American English? The British were in India and Burma for years, I do not see any corresponding American connection. Loopy30 (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think fixed it now. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:5023:99FB:2ED1:17B6 (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The "Use American English" template recently placed by SchreiberBike is still there. What I was looking for was the rationale for keeping it. Loopy30 (talk) 12:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I ended up removing it. Im not sure whats the purpose of this template either to the article. 2001:4455:1A9:E100:1039:C4D2:8092:F4BC (talk) 22:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Loopy30: - agreed, and done per mos:ties to India and Myanmar - MPF (talk) 15:27, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]