Jump to content

Talk:Developments in Dubai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Human Rights and Labor

[edit]

This last section is not strictly relevant to this page, and is already included elsewhere (on the Dubai page). I propose that it should be deleted.

Well, then might as well delete this whole article and include everything on one single Dubai page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.53.118 (talk) 11:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Human Rights section is very relevent, especially here, as this article is focusing on projects, that are encourging the lack of Human rights, not just in Dubai, but United Arab Emirates in general. I should know, I grew up here. —IncidentFlux (talk) 11:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This section is grossly bias. Other cities across the world have seen its development partially through the hands of migrant workers yet, this article squarely receives the brunt. It is mind boggling that this section is even here. Scythian1 (talk) 02:57, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please explain in more detail what exact issue you think is biased. Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 20:51, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Removing the NPOV dispute as the person above who claimed a bias never fully justified their position.

Fair use rationale for Image:The world Dubai.jpg

[edit]

Image:The world Dubai.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Business Bay

[edit]

Does anyone know what this building is called? I'm intrigued by its shape and would like to find more information on it. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.226.68 (talk) 14:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is Burj Al Alam. --Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 21:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The image Image:Dubaimall.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:25, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some new Developments projects

[edit]

hi, here i want to mention some more developments projects, which are not mentioned in the current artilce. i will add those projects to improve the standard of this article.


I am currently working on these projects when they will complete i will give you people the list of the Developmnt projects whihc are to be added. thanx..

Colossal (talk) 05:49, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Developments in Dubai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 6 external links on Developments in Dubai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:14, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:06, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]