Talk:Electoral history of Michael Bloomberg

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed Split

This article uses templates aggressively -- too many, in fact, to correctly render the article. I think it would help to split the article into two; one with the presedential results and one with the mayoral results. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:08, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikeblas: The issues with rendering the article came from the use of the {{trim}} template. All the transcluded sections were within {{trim}}, and trim uses {{#if}}, so they were essentially a template within a template within a template, and they were being counted three times in the post-expand include size, causing it to hit the 2MB limit. I swapped the {{trim}} calls for {{#if:1}}s, which cut it from 2MB to 1.5MB, and if we remove the {{#if}}s altogether (I don't think they're needed), it would reduce it to under 1MB. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 14:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Looks a lot better already. Why is a the conditional if used to trim a string? Why is string trimming necessary so repeatedly in the article? But, maybe more importantly, should we ditch the idea of splitting the article? There's some headroom with your fixes, so maybe it isn't necessary any longer. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the split request I've made, since Ahect has the article rendering correctly now. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikeblas:I think this article should be deleted entirely. There's no reason for it to exist, it can just go on Bloomberg's page. Smith0124 (talk) 05:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. I think there's enough material here to warrant a split article. -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:57, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]