Talk:Fly Gibraltar

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fly Gibraltar article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on June 12, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

British Overseas Territories

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gibraltar Low‑importance

	Gibraltar portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GibraltarWikipedia:WikiProject GibraltarTemplate:WikiProject GibraltarGibraltar articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Aviation: Defunct airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the Defunct Airlines task force.

Edits

There have been some really crap edits recently. Please only edit the article if you can spell and don't stereotype! --w2ch00

AfD

This article is about an 'airline' that does not fly, operated by OEM who are reported to have pulled out.

Its not getting off the ground. --Gibnews 14:56, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Strongly suggest some sources independant of the airline's website be used to verify and expand this article. here are a few I found on a quick Googlebash. -- saberwyn 22:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Gibraltar Magazine article
Information about stand at the World Travel Market
Reproduction of Government Press Release - would be an idea to find the original goivernment department that released it.

The press releases are issued by the Government of Gibraltar their website is gibraltar.gov.gi they can also be found on my site at http://www.gibnews.net/cgi-bin/gn_show.pl?gogx.

However, articles in the press and hopeful statements by Government in the past do not an airline make. The backers are OEM International aka Robert Noonan an aged Irish multi-millionaire in the property business, whose development of the Gibraltar Rosia tanks site seems to have stalled. --Gibnews 19:04, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure which facts are in dispute here. There is such an airline (fact), it intends to operate out of Gibraltar to the mentioned destinations (fact), it was supposed to have started in spring of 07 (fact) but has been delayed till 08 or more (fact). Even though it is vapourware so far, all the facts in the article are verifiable, I feel the wikipedia article is appropriate. So can we get rid of the factual-accuracy tag? - Binand 21:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute that there is an airline. Anyone can produce pictures of an airliner on photoshop, issue speculative press releases and register a website, that does not make it real or notable enough for a wikipedia entry. The same guys were supposed to be building an airport in Jimena De La Frontera, both projects are vapourware which may impress their investors but do not deserve an entry in Wikipedia. --Gibnews 11:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That may be the case, but facts say that there are press releases and such (even the government of Gibraltar issues press releases - see http://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/latest_news/press_releases/2006/234-2006.pdf); verifying the veracity of the claims made in these releases or background-checking the originators of such releases probably fall under original research. So I really don't think the FlyGib article lacks factual accuracy. Now notability - that's totally different and I fully agree that a vapourware airline is hardly notable enough for a wikipedia article :) - Binand 05:29, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but the GoG article simply welcomes the airline it does not confirm it is real; see also http://www.thenewpeople.net/print/110507.pdf --Gibnews 09:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FlyGibraltar.gif

Image:FlyGibraltar.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]