Talk:Glossary of arithmetic and diophantine geometry

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Glossaries (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glossaries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.GlossariesWikipedia:WikiProject GlossariesTemplate:WikiProject GlossariesGlossaries articles

2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 14:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed PROD tag - explanation

I've removed the PROD tag recently added to this article, because I believe it is a useful glossary of techincal terms (and not just a list of dictionary definitions, as the PROD notice implies) and it does not contravene anything in WP:LIST. Deletion of this article should be debated at AfD. Gandalf61 14:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no arithmetic geometry page?

There should be an arithmetic geometry page focused on introducing the subject. This could follow some of the topics in "Invitation to Arithmetic Geometry". The introduction there gives many nice examples of topics which could be discussed on an introductory page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.75.155 (talk) 05:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tell you the reason. It's simple: no one has bothered to start arithmetic geometry (currently the redirect to this page). I think this is very, ..., sad (if I may to use this dreaded expression). I myself cannot do anything about this as I have zero background in this area. -- Taku (talk)