Talk:Glucosamine
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glucosamine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not approved as a prescription medicine is wrong
[edit]That statement in the second paragraph is only true for the United States. I haven't looked at all EU countries, but stronger glucosamine medicines are available in Finland with a doctor's prescription. Verificity (talk) 11:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class chemicals articles
- Mid-importance chemicals articles
- B-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
- B-Class MCB articles
- Mid-importance MCB articles
- WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
- Start-Class Skepticism articles
- High-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- B-Class Alternative medicine articles
- B-Class pharmacology articles
- Mid-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages