Talk:Heliamphora ionasi

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Venezuela

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Carnivorous plants: Plants Low‑importance

	Heliamphora ionasi is within the scope of WikiProject Carnivorous plants, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to carnivorous plants. For more information, visit the project page.Carnivorous plantsWikipedia:WikiProject Carnivorous plantsTemplate:WikiProject Carnivorous plantscarnivorous plant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Low-importance).

ionasii vs. ionasi

Upon examining Maguire's description, and having looked at the type specimens at Kew Herbarium (as of today), I can confirm that the spelling with only one -i is the correct one; it may read unpleasantly in English, but in botanical terms, the name is fine, declined correctly, and the spelling ionasii invalid. Attenboroughii (talk) 17:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ionasii vs. ionasi 2

The footnote about the spelling of the epithet seems to be based on the assumption that specific epithets cannot be corrected, but they can. The International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants explicitly allows for this: https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/pages/main/art_60.html. The fact that the original author spelled the epithet ionasi (apparently thinking that Jonah is "Ionasus" in Latin?!) is of little importance. Whatever the correct spelling of the epithet is, the footnote makes no sense. 2001:980:23AB:1:BCD1:EC12:E57F:D646 (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]