Jump to content

Talk:Immigration to Europe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Poland

[edit]

Despite the fact, Poland is believed to be against immigration, Poland is actually no 1 immigration country regarding working immigrants. Here is one of the sources https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Residence_permits_statistics#First_residence_permits:_an_overview Cautious (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

[edit]

The article is Immigration TO Europe, yet so much of it is about immigration within Europe. Is that the intent? If so, a name change may be in order. Dionix (talk) 19:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Number of references

[edit]

Do we really need seven (!) references for this one sentence: According to the Financial Times, Spain is the most favoured destination for Western Europeans considering to move from their own country and seek jobs elsewhere in the EU. It seems a bit excessive. 71.205.170.70 (talk) 01:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is so wrong

[edit]

The statement "Switzerland has the highest immigrant population of any European country with more than one and a half million residents, as 23% of its 7.5 million residents are foreign-born. Countries in which immigrants form between 10% and 20% of the population are: Latvia (19%), Estonia (15%), Austria (15%), Ukraine (15%), Croatia (15%), Cyprus (14.3%), Ireland (14%), Moldova (13%), Germany (12%), Sweden (12%), Belarus (12%), Italy (11,9%),Spain (11%), France (10%) and the Netherlands (10%)" is wrong. Switzerland is the country with the higher PERCENTAGE of immigrants, and it is not the country that has the highest immigrant population. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_immigrant_population Have a look at this list and you can see as Italy hasn't got 11% of immigrants. Spain's total immigrant population and percentage of immigrant population is higher than Italy's. The countries in Europe with more immigrants are; Russia (12 millions, 8.483% of the total population), Germany (10.1 millions, 12.31% of the total population), Ukraine (6.8 millions, 14.7% of the total population), France (6.4 millions, 10.18% of the total population), United Kingdom (5.4 millions, 8.982% of the total population), Spain (5.2 millions, 11.45% of the total population) and Italy (~4.4 millions, 7.5% of the total population). Switzerland has got 1.6 millions of immigrants, 22.89% of its total population. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.23.132 (talk) 17:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete the table (2005 data)

[edit]

This is the foreign world population by country (source UN). Notes are possible for adding updates, until next data is released. So unfairly Italy has 4.3%, with 2.5 million foreign population (now 8.1% with more than 4.3 million). Spain as well has increased its foreign population from 10.8% to 12.2% (5.6 million in 2009 and 5.7 million in 2010). 178.109.14.14 (talk) 18:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article scope

[edit]

The title is "immigration to Europe", but it is slightly comical to give a brief discussion of Neanterthals and Cro Magnon when 95% of the article is dedicated to the post-1980 immigration boom. I suggest this is a matter for disambiguation. "Immigration to Europe" should be understood as contemporary immigration to Europe, with a "history" section covering events since the 1970s or so. Historical immigration (Roman and Ottoman Empires, Romani, medieval to early modern, 19th century) should go to a separate article, currently existing as a section-with-possiblities here. --dab (𒁳) 09:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest moving the contemporary, "Today's immigration" subsection of the article to the Migration crisis in Europe article.Rob.HUN (talk) 19:06, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

<Sorry I've jerry-rigged this to another post. Unsure of wiki layout> I noticed that reference ^62 is a dead link. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-11-034/EN/KS-SF-11-034-EN.PDF

Please see the following link of the article in question and consider fixing accordingly. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3433488/5579176/KS-SF-11-034-EN.PDF

Mjoseph97 (talk) 15:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Immigration to Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Immigration to Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:30, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Immigration to the United States which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:30, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Immigration to Europe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Schengen agreement

[edit]

The statement that free movement of people was established through the Schengen agreement is a common, but completely wrong, misconception. The Schengen agreement regulates border controls between member states of the Schengen area, it has nothing to do with the right to move between the countries or settle in another country. The free movement of workers was established way long before that, actually in the 1960s through a directive. The right was extended to students in the 1990s, and (to some extent) to all EU citizens through directive 2004/38/EC, which became effective in 2006. --Glentamara (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Immigration to Europe

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Immigration to Europe's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto1":

  • From Airplane: FAI News: 100 Years Ago, the Dream of Icarus Became Reality Archived January 13, 2011, at the Wayback Machine posted 17 December 2003. Retrieved: 5 January 2007.
  • From European migrant crisis: "Migrant boat capsizes off Libya, 400 feared dead". Fox News Channel. 15 April 2015. Archived from the original on 30 September 2015. Retrieved 19 April 2015.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 12:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]