Talk:King Cotton
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the King Cotton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Should we rename this article?
[edit]The article discusses the economic theory more than the slogan. Doesn't that mean we should we rename it to King Cotton theory or something like that? — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- keep. the slogan is about the economic power of cotton, and the theory explains why so. Rjensen (talk) 04:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Rjensen: Ok then. Fair enough. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:02, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- keep. the slogan is about the economic power of cotton, and the theory explains why so. Rjensen (talk) 04:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Merge with Cotton diplomacy?
[edit]This article seems to cover a lot of the same ground as Cotton diplomacy. Would a merger be appropriate? Mobi Ditch (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Request to add to 'British Position'
[edit]Hello,
I would like to add a sentence in-between '...British public opinion', and 'Even if Britain did intervene...'.
I would like to add a sentence that describes in short how Britain was against the idea of slavery, but seen as jealous of the economic progression in the States at the time, leading to increased tensions between the two (as written about by Matthew Karp in 'King Cotton, Emperor Slavery'). Any feedback is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Mperry34 (talk) 12:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- This looks like a good edit and an extra piece of information on an interesting topic, just make sure that you're using an RS B1GMelman613 (talk) 15:28, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military historiography articles
- Military historiography task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class American Civil War articles
- American Civil War task force articles
- Start-Class Agriculture articles
- Mid-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- Start-Class United States History articles
- Mid-importance United States History articles
- WikiProject United States History articles
- Start-Class Trade articles
- Mid-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles
- Start-Class Economics articles
- Mid-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles