Talk:Long-thumbed frog
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name
[edit]I think the article should be moved to Barking Marsh Frog or Fletcher's Frog, I haven't even heard the name "Long-thumbed Frog" be used for the species. -- Froggydarb croak 08:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- It's given as names on frogs.org.au and frogaustralia, however I've already made redirects for the other pages and given the 3 names for the species in the article.--Tnarg12345 09:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think it really matters with a frog which is not known by many lay-people. No need to change it, it is Long-thumbed Frog in Barker, Grigg and Tyler. Also, just for future reference, if a redirect page has only one edit in its history, then any user can move to it. I am also willing to move any non-controversial moves. It is basically just a discussion between us three as I doubt anyone else is watching this page yet. Thanks --liquidGhoul 10:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- Start-Class South Australia articles
- Low-importance South Australia articles
- WikiProject South Australia articles
- Start-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- Start-Class Victoria articles
- Low-importance Victoria articles
- WikiProject Victoria articles
- Start-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles