This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
Splitting hairs, sorry. The article text says this was an uncontained failure. The infobox states it was a contained. I suspect that unless there were multiple engine failures for this event, it cannot be both. Which should it be? Casual internet searching didn't help me arrive at an answer. 75.163.146.225 (talk)
Context: I'm interested in this because the flight 328 page calls this a similar >uncontained< failure. If it's uncontained however, it's probably not similar (You generally need different magnitudes of energy to fail uncontained). 75.163.146.225 (talk) 21:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the linked article. In the strict technical sense, uncontainment relates to the failure of the engine casing to keep parts from exiting through it by making a new hole in the side of the engine. The engine naturally has a big hole in the front and a smaller hole in the back, and those holes are not expected to contain engine fragments. So if fragments exit via the inlet or outlet, the failure is technically contained, even though parts rain down on the ground. Dhaluza (talk) 01:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
