Talk:MSSTYLES

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Perhaps rename article to "Visual style"?

Perhaps this article could be renamed to "Visual style", put the current content under an MSSTYLES section, and describe the concept of Windows XP/Vista visual styles in general. It just seems a bit lacking how a detail about visual styles exists, but not about Microsoft's skin engine itself. -- Northgrove 10:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't Zune a colour scheme of Royale, the same as Royale Noir, which has also bee signed, BTW, even though it was never officially released? THe screeenshots I have seen of it are pretty similar, with ony a few tweaks and an orange start button.

WindowBlinds doesn't apply MSSTYLES, it uses its own skinning engine. Izt 18:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on MSSTYLES. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080416011251/http://www.withinwindows.com:80/uxtheme-patches/ to http://www.withinwindows.com/uxtheme-patches/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can I add a sub-topic about msstyle editor at the end of article?

I mean unofficial editors because there're none official one. This file format is largely popular in resource/theme community but the program to deal with it only developed by hobbyists. Nnq2603 (talk) 02:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MSSTYLES. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080416231758/http://www.codegazer.com/vistaglazz/ to http://www.codegazer.com/vistaglazz/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Release date?

Previously, the release date of the format was listed as July 13, 2000, which does not have any reference linked, and I cannot find anything that points to the MSSTYLES format being introduced on July 13, 2000. I changed it to August 24, 2001 (the date Windows XP's RTM was released to manufacturing) for now, but I'm not sure what it should be listed as. Diyamund (talk) 23:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ThemeTool

A tool by the name of ThemeTool is being developed by someone named Lucas Brooks, which can supposedly decompile and recompile MSSTYLES themes, including some things which have been untouched before, such as animations (which are supposedly stored inside the MSSTYLES file in Windows 8 and up). Here is a Tweet from them showcasing the tool. Obviously, since this tool has no public build at all, there is no way to tell whether any of this is real or not short of reverse engineering the Windows Vista+ MSSTYLES format yourself. Just putting this here in-case the program ever does get released, because it could be massively useful. Diyamund (talk) 23:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]