Talk:Nayib Bukele/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 23:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DeadlyRampage26 (talk · contribs) 00:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll do this review. It is a fairly long article so it will probably take a few weeks to review.DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is understandable to a broad audience. Appropriate number of wikilinks which do a good part to supplement this. Upon running prose through a few different spelling and grammar checker the prose seems to be fine, and I have fixed a few of the minor errors myself.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Lead section is decent, was concerned at first about the length, but upon reading MOS guidelines and considering the length of the entire prose, it seems appropriate. Lead section also provides a good overview of his political positions and philosophy, which is what most are here for. Layout complies with guidelines. Complies with the other MOS guidelines
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Layout of references does indeed comply with the guidelines.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Each paragraph does have relevant citations and they are in the correct places respective to the article. Source spot check results I spot checked source 63, this source claims that the inauguration took place at the national palace, whilst the article states it happened at a plaza. Spot checks also conducted on sources 223 and 39 and about 4 others, which all came back good.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Source 10 may be a primary source (?) as its directly from a government page. Cant see any other primaries.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No plagiarism as evident by 2 different detectors.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	I would say that the information is in scope.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Wondering if maybe there should be a 'Presidency of Nayib Bukele' page in which some of the more government-wide information could be moved to and simply summarised here? That may not be needed ill need to consult more with guidelines.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Questions

Ok, so first question is why are there so damn many spanish translations in the body? where is that required and does it need to really be after every single phrase he said? DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 00:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:FOREIGNQUOTE, translations are only included when the text is not already in English, ie I translated it myself from an article in Spanish PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 03:27, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks man DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 09:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Recommendations List

There is a lot of 'which' as the operative. Examples would include 'which launched', 'which made' etc that grammar checkers are recommending change to 'that'.

I've changed every instance to "that" or reworded sentences to eliminate which. The only instance left is in the first sentence of the lead "[...] and the left-wing Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN), of which Bukele had previously been a member". PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 16:04, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per Words to Watch, I would recommend changing words like 'said' to something different. MOS:SAID, MOS:OP-ED DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 07:32, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly. I didn't realize "said" was used 46 times. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 16:51, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed all but 6 instances of "said", where those 6 instances are about him physically saying something so to me it makes sense in context. MOS:SAID doesn't say we need to completely avoid "said", so I think just these 6 are fine. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 18:21, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yep no need to completely eliminate all of them, it was just a bit overused. Thanks DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 20:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DeadlyRampage26: The National Palace is in the Gerardo Barrios Plaza, but I still changed it to National Palace. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 08:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks man. Just wanted to apologise for not being as active in this review as you may have wanted. Ill try speed things up a bit. Ill do a bit more now. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 10:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]