Talk:New York State Route 164

New York State Route 164 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 21, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	New York
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 164/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Something that did come up in my mind when I did this was that there is no current infromation. The newly updated NYSDOT site could have some project listed for NY 164. The lead could also use a bit more detail (the termini aren't even listed in that).

B. Focused:
Please cut the mention of original 164, not relevant to the current one.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
See below

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
I won't affect the GAN for it, but a picture would be useful. If there's any free ones it would be very helpful to the article.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

This article has some work to do it seems, but it should be easy to fix. Good luck!^Mitch 32 ^contribs 10:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review (finally!). I just checked, and NYSDOT has zilch on this route. Other issues have been fixed. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 14:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Ears

This article is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates, with a view to nominating it as a Featured Article. Fasach Nua (talk) 17:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I used that as an example of a short yet comprehensive article. I have no intention of nominating this. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 17:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see why not, if it meets the criteria.... Fasach Nua (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather not nominate it, but feel free. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've found some early history information that I'll add eventually, so it's not completely comprehensive right now. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]