Talk:North Carolina Highway 98/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, will post my comments soon. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 18:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Fairly well-written, only a few comments:

• In the lead, small-to-medium-sized Are the first and second hyphens needed?
• In Route description,

• "concurrency" may be linked (if you repeat links from the lead)
• and NC 50, have a Comma not required
• Source(s) for the 2nd para?

• In History,

• NC 98 was rerouted west again "again" appears redundant
• NC 98 was rerouted in Durham: replacing the old alignment I think it should be a comma, not a colon

• In Junction list,

• I am not sure if Google Maps is a proper source.

• It is considered to be a "last resort" method of sourcing to a tenth of a mile, when there are no official mileages from the state. Some FAs do have it, such as U.S. Route 50 in Nevada. --Rschen7754 02:08, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks, then we can have it here. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

• Is each point in the table sourced?

These addressed, I would be happy to promote this. Cheers! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:29, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

@Ncchild: --Rschen7754 02:07, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

I am happy to do these right now however I do have several comments. First Google Maps has been a proper source for items like Route Description for my last several GA's (North Carolina Highway 102 and North Carolina Highway 68). I will also look at the table to see if it is sourced or not, I did not create it however I did verify the mileage.--Ncchild (talk) 21:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

So I have completed the corrections that were specified above. As far as the table souces I did look into what other GA articles have and it appears to be in line. --Ncchild (talk) 21:18, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. This can be promoted now. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)