Talk:Palomar Observatory
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Palomar Observatory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trivia
[edit]Only one person got the tour of palomar : false ! Palomar has open hours for public. As another example, Caltech students from any major like biology or economics also go to tour the palomar observatory at times. Access for non-professionals is hard, but not impossible. Am deleting that sentence ! (Varunbhalerao 08:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC))
Small science
[edit]Should this still be listed under the Category "Big Science"? Clearly that used to be true, but 200 inch telescopes have not been considered "big" for at least 25 years. Rnt20 07:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
- The early telescopes on Palomar and Wilson were big when they were constructed. In fact they were the among largest precise scientific instruments ever made to that point. They defined the concept of "big science". Your suggestion would be like deleting old race cars from the race car category because those models aren't raced anymore. -Willmcw 08:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
- Just a thought, but it could be pointed out that the 200 inch telescope remains the largest equatorially mounted optical telescope in the world. All the bigger scopes are mounted on computer controlled alt-azimuth mounts. Bill McHale 21:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Palomar Mountain
[edit]Palomar Mountain should not redirect here! -Branddobbe 00:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- Until there's an article on the mountain itself it seems like a reasonable redirect. Would you like to write such an article? That'd be great. Cheers, -Willmcw 01:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- There is such an article: Palomar Mountain. I will change the redirect. --Droll 06:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Country
[edit]Please stop reverting helpful additions. Please step back and consider whether you are reverting these changes for the benefit of Wikipedia, or to win an arguement. I have tried to make articles more relevant to a global readership. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.253.126 (talk) 16:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Palarmra telescope
[edit]I would like to —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.199.175.241 (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Palomar Observatory Sky Survey I & II
[edit]There were two Palomar Observatory Sky Surveys, one which has its own page National Geographic Society - Palomar Observatory Sky Survey and one that redirects to this page Palomar Observatory Sky Survey II. While this page does have a section on sky surveys, it seems like there should be some consolidation between these three options. Maybe a new page on Palomar Observatory Sky Surveys and then sections on I and II?
128.97.245.50 (talk) 04:45, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Palomar Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080101110647/http://www.darksky.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=55060&orgId=idsa to http://www.darksky.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=55060&orgId=idsa
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090516193335/http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~wws/poss2.html to http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~wws/poss2.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070204102050/http://bigpicture.caltech.edu/ to http://bigpicture.caltech.edu/
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121212205940/http://www.palomar.caltech.edu:8000/instruments/p200_calendar.tcl to http://www.palomar.caltech.edu:8000/instruments/p200_calendar.tcl
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030411112150/http://rhfleet.org/site/astronomy/palomar.html to http://www.rhfleet.org/site/astronomy/palomar.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031231045038/http://lyra.colorado.edu/sbo/sboinfo/readingroom/poss.html to http://lyra.colorado.edu/sbo/sboinfo/readingroom/poss.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Scientific units of measurment
[edit]Since the Wikipedia is serious source of information for billions of people from arround the World, I would strongly suggest to use primarely scientific units of measurment, and secondary local (traditional) units like inches, miles etc. (in brackets). Joanna Wieczorek (talk) 18:06, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
José Antonio de Artigas Sanz?
[edit]Who is that? Under the Hale Telescope section,José Antonio de Artigas Sanz is listed as the person who cast the 23-ton glass block. The glass block for the mirror was cast by the Corning Glass Company and did not involve a person by that name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomad9990 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Correct. Unless the author of that statement can offer a primary source, I will be deleting that sentence in the near future. --Acmejia (talk) 14:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)