Talk:Peter Ackroyd

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Children's literature Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Poetry: William Blake Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by William Blake task force (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ+ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ+ Person task force.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexuality

Peter Ackroyd is openly gay. Why isn't there a Category link to LGBT people, or to gay writers? Nuttyskin 03:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Ackroyd is not gay.[[1]]91.85.182.76 (talk) 10:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... and yet...[2]. Whatever his declared sexuality now, he has identified as gay in the past. He seems to have moved from a position of living openly with a partner (who died from AIDS) to saying nothing about the subject, apart from pithy comments to the Independent (as above). I think some mention should be made of his past life and his attitudes to it now. I'm not 100% that one off-the-cuff comment to a paper and general silence on the subject elsewhere should mean an automatic removal of the LGBT category.--80.1.181.1(talk) 18:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albion

I changed the description of Albion, because it is not the most scholarly of his books; the rather obscure Notes for a New Culture surely deserves that prize. --Jbmurray 05:57, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Cleanup" tag

I added this mainly because the introductory para (see here) doesn't summarize subject's notability, but a few sub headings would also help. I may well get back to this, but it could be a while so don't hang back! --Old Moonraker 16:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone (anon) had taken this tag away. The intro paragraph is not acceptable as it stands. I don't think I am in a position to summarize his notability, so I replaced it with an "improve lead" tag. Sam Staton (talk) 12:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the repair. ~~I really must get round to this.~~ --Old Moonraker (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redact the above: other users have made big improvements. --Old Moonraker (talk) 09:44, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

London: The Biography

Look through the index of this 800 page tome, so glowingly reviewed, and you'll find no reference to Arsenal, Lords Cricket Ground, Ken Livingstone, schools, the Crystal Palace....I could go on. Only an Englishman could be culpable of such omissions, and be so highly acclaimed by his compatriots. Millbanks 07:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

800 pages, eh! Big, isn't it? Just imagine how much bigger it would be if Ackroyd included the topics you mention. The point is, the man's "acclaim" is as an historian (originally as a writer of historical novels) and when we buy his factual work we are expecting him to have used his expertise to select and present from the huge amount of material available. I'm guessing, now, that you are well aware of this and not really expecting anyone to take the post too seriously! --Old Moonraker 08:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I DO expect this point to be taken seriously. The omissions I make are very significant ones. There are lots of people in the book whose names are quite unfamiliar, and yet there's no mention of Ken Livingstone, a famous Londoner if ever there was one. And aren't the famous London schools worth a mention? That need not make the book longer. He could just remove some of the more obscure references. As for sport, dear me, he is in good company. Gerard Young's History of Bognor Regis has no mention of it. Nor does Alan Warwick's The Phoenix Suburb about the Crystal Palace area. Only the English could do that. In contrast Ruth Dudley Edwards's An Atlas of Irish History contains a chapter on sport. Apparently she was "ticked off" for the omission of this in an earlier edition, so she got two colleagues "to fill the gap". Millbanks 07:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Surely it's a matter of readers choosing the books that they think will interest them. I bought this book because of its historical scope, and Ackroyd's reputation. While reading it I found out about unfamiliar people, as you say. Learning something unfamiliar was part of the point. If I'd wanted a more up-to-date view about more familiar aspects of the city I could have bought, for example, Terence Conran's book which does have a few pages on football. Ken Livingston wrote the forward. It's all a matter of selection and choice: I chose a book where I anticipated the author would have made his selection with an historical bias, and was not disappointed.

Actually I think we may now be straying from the point of the talk page somewhat: Shouldn't we be discussing the article and how to improve it? A good lead identifying Ackroyd's importance has been requested for some months, for example. --Old Moonraker 08:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Comparable to Martin Amis"

I've added an {{or}} tag to "His works are comparable to Martin Amis, John Banville and Sebastian Barry". In any case, it doesn't meet the WP:LEDE criteria: an "introduction...and summary of the article below". --Old Moonraker (talk) 20:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks User:Charles Matthews. --Old Moonraker (talk) 16:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One and only ?

Are there more than one writer called Peter Ackroyd ? I found an Peter R. Ackroyd who writes about the Bible, but are te Astronomy books and London by the same person ? (And if not, which of them wrote the Newton book ). --Kummi (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The novel First Light and the biography of Isaac Newton are both by the subject of this article. Reverend Peter Runham Ackroyd, biblical scholar, died in 2005. --Old Moonraker (talk) 05:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'Peter Ackroyd' must surely be a committee of writers. 'He' produces at least 2 substantial works every year, which is not humanly possible for a single writer. (Just kidding.)81.146.36.100 (talk) 00:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gissing or Meredith?

In Early career section, I think it is George Meredith who is meant, not George Gissing. I dare not correct it myself because I read the novel quite a long time ago. Please correct this section if I'm right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.52.24.125 (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are right: be WP:BOLD. --Old Moonraker (talk) 07:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reading a novel

"I don't think I even read a novel till I was about 26 or 27". But he got a degree in literature. What??? 123.243.29.122 (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]