Talk:Tony Bennett discography

This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles

Jazz List‑class Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
List	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

State of discography

This discography obviously needs a lot of work (missing regular albums, label changes, a zillion compilations, reissues, singles, chart positions, DVDs ...) and possibly reformatting (is the table that User:Walden started the right way to present this?), but I don't intend to do it. I did add a couple of external references to the best web discographies I could find. Wasted Time R 16:43, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I subsequently did a decent albums list and a spotty singles list; the discography article states what was put in and what was not. Wasted Time R 14:40, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Format...

Can we reformat this discography so that it more resembles ella's and franks, so eventually we can start writing up the albums? yawn........ [19:59, 13 November 2005 Gareth E Kegg]

Yes, the reformat is ok. But be more careful when you add wikilinks for all the albums — all of the blue links there now are bogus, i.e. they are to songs or movies of the same name, and none are to actual Tony Bennett albums. As for your "yawn", for the most part I see no need to write up Tony Bennett album articles. None of them are as famous as the Sinatra 1950s proto-concept albums or the Ella songbook albums. The main article mentions the most significant ones, that can well be enough, there's no need for anyone to push themselves farther than that. Wasted Time R 05:16, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Compilations

I believe that "first run" compilation albums should be included in the albums list. By this I mean compilations that were released in sequence with original material albums, such as the Greatest Hits volumes I through IV, as well as the more prominent, well-put-together Columbia compilations after his comeback. Putting these albums in the list helps tell the Bennett story. The many other off-brand compilations and re-packagings can still be left out, since they don't add anything to the story. Wasted Time R 01:38, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tony Bennett discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703152246/http://www.tonybennett.net/ to http://www.tonybennett.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]