Talk:Train to Pakistan

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern.

India: Literature Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

anyone care to give examples of POV problems with this article? Syzergy 01:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add the POV tag, but if you see a section in an article called "Moral message" and there is not a single citation or reference for the whole article, POV is almost guaranteed. Unfortunately, I am not familiar enough with the subject matter to pick out where it is.--Hraefen ^Talk 05:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see the POV issues. The article is very neutral, "Singh makes it clear that many people played a part in this chaos and everyone was equally worthy of blame". Who can take issue with that? Lincoln187 09:20, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just removed the sentence "This is a startling poie have taken a right step at the right time then there would not have been such a massive bloodshed in India" (sic), which represents a POV problem example (apart from issues of meaning and grammar). This particular example may be fixable by quoting from the book itself (assuming this is the author's summary view of the Partition), otherwise there's a clear bias here. --Kink (talk) 11:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just going to remove the POV section. In actuality, there are a number of characters with sufficient presence to be considered protagonists, so I don't think an accurate POV could even BE determined. If someone wants to work on a section regarding a possible bias of the author, that would be more appropriate. Event Nexus (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 20:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Combine Articles

There are appear to be two articles on the same novel, each with almost the same content. Train to Pakistan and Train to Pakiston (Mano Majra) should be combined. Glederma (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]