Talk:Wake (comics)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]Propose that the article be moved per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline, to fall in line with all the others using (comics). Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? MURGH disc. 09:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Move done. MURGH disc. 21:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
More info
[edit]There appears to be a different artist, Jose Munuera, doing a series about when Navee was a child growing up. The official website appears to be poukram.org. --BlueNight (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- These were added to the article in a March 2nd, 2008 edit under Wake (comics)#Nävis --Cubbi (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Comparison to Planetes
[edit]I don't recall seeing any nudity in Planetes. The comparison of adult themes between series seemes a bit ORish. That said, I do agree that it is an interesting example of censorship (if it can be referenced, currently the entire section has no refs).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:07, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
The comic (manga) version of Planetes has one big nude scene at the end of phase 14 where Sally is trying to knock her crewmate Hachi out of a depression by offering him sex. In the TokyoPop versions published in english this scene occurs in volume 3 (ISBN1591825105) between pages 102-112. This is the most explicit sexual portrayal in the series, though there are constant innuendos and pornography floating around in zero gee. Wake has none of this. - jsuros
Classification of Issue 1 as Pornography in USA
[edit]Observed this personally at Amazing Al's Comics in Chula Vista, California, USA in 2000. Not sure how to cite this? - jsuros —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsuros (talk • contribs) 02:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
NPOV?
[edit]It seems a number of recent edits to this page have significantly changed the neutrality of this article. The introduction of words such as "needlessly" and "only" seems heavy-handed. I know little about the work in question, so I don't want to revert all the edits immediately. Someone with some familiarity with the topic should look into changing this. 94.193.52.157 (talk) 23:57, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- The changes in question are clearly POV (some Frogs can't handle the fact that other languages exist...), and have been reverted. I thus removed the NPOV tag. -- Imladros (talk) 23:31, 7 October 2010 (UTC)