Talk:Wrasse

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life articles

Too many

Looking to the future, there are too many species (>500) to list on the Family page. Would there be any objection if I made a start on creating Genus pages, which would be more appropriate places to list species, & then remove the species list from this article? GrahamBould 20:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree there are two many wrasses to list all the species on one page, but I much prefer the vertical bulleted list, with indentation to show levels of classification as seen on Lethrinidae. How do you feel about changing the format of the list:

Shrek Fish

I expected to find something about the 'Shrek Fish' near Sado island —Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.80.11.194 (talk) 17:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Genera

Subfamily Labridae
- Genus ** Genus Lethrinus Cuvier, 1829
- Genus Acantholabrus
- Genus Achoerodus
- Genus Ammolabrus
- Genus Anampses
- Genus Anchichoerops
- Genus Austrolabrus
- Genus Bodianus
- Genus Centrolabrus
- Genus Cheilinus
- Genus Cheilio
- Genus Choerodon
- Genus Cirrhilabrus
- Genus Clepticus
- Genus Conniella
- Genus Coris
- Genus Ctenolabrus
- Genus Cymolutes
- Genus Decodon
- Genus Diproctacanthus
- Genus Doratonotus
- Genus Dotalabrus
- Genus Epibulus
- Genus Eupetrichthys
- Genus Frontilabrus
- Genus Gomphosus
- Genus Halichoeres
- Genus Hemigymnus
- Genus Hologymnosus
- Genus Iniistius
- Genus Julichthys
- Genus Labrichthys
- Genus Labroides
- Genus Labropsis
- Genus Labrus
- Genus Lachnolaimus
- Genus Lappanella
- Genus Larabicus
- Genus Leptojulis
- Genus Macropharyngodon
- Genus Malapterus
- Genus Minilabrus
- Genus Nelabrichthys
- Genus Notolabrus
- Genus Novaculichthys
- Genus Novaculoides
- Genus Ophthalmolepis
- Genus Oxycheilinus
- Genus Oxyjulis
- Genus Paracheilinus
- Genus Parajulis
- Genus Pictilabrus
- Genus Polylepion
- Genus Pseudocheilinops
- Genus Pseudocheilinus
- Genus Pseudocoris
- Genus Pseudodax
- Genus Pseudojuloides
- Genus Pseudolabrus
- Genus Pteragogus
- Genus Semicossyphus
- Genus Stethojulis
- Genus Suezichthys
- Genus Symphodus
- Genus Tautoga
- Genus Tautogolabrus
- Genus Terelabrus
- Genus Thalassoma
- Genus Wetmorella
- Genus Xenojulis
- Genus Xiphocheilus
- Genus Xyrichtys

Also how do you feel about removing the "typical wrasse" from the box on the right. I think it's unnecessary, and belies the diversity of wrasses as a group.

Hwttdz (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tool usage

Just found this article: "Fish known as wrasses are found to use tools". It's repeated in several more articles, so I assume its reliable. It applies to just the orange dotted tusk fish, but it's a wrasse and we don't have an article on the specific type of wrasse. Should this information be added to the article? It seems pretty significant. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 13:44, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]