User talk:-kayac-

Welcome!

Hello, -kayac-, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! జె.వి.ఆర్.కె.ప్రసాద్ 23:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Witchcraft

Look, just because you're Italian doesn't mean that you know everything. The edits that you've made to the Witchcraft (contemporary) and Stregheria articles constitute what we call "original research" here -- basically, your edits are not based on what the sources say, they're based on what you think you know. We can't telepathically verify what it is that you know and what source you learned it from. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 14:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm not just Italian. Firstly, I'm very well into the Craft, here in Italy, and it is is not my Original Research what I wrote about the word Stregheria, you can read about it in every dictionary/vocabulary here, or in some Encyclopaedia, are you able to read in Italian? Secondly: if some Italian American used it for their Craft, for me it is not a problem, but here in Italy it was practically never used for it in the past, and only very recently some very few reconstructionists, inspired by Grimassi, used it ; thirdly, from the very same articles that we are discussing about it is clear that it is an Italian American movement, not Italian. I will gladly read you opinion before you revert another time my edits. Thank You ---kayac- (talk) 15:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you trying to convince me? This isn't about me or you, it's about what reliable sources say. If most sources say that Stregheria is an Italian belief system then that's what we'll call it here. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 15:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, if the sources that you are speaking about is Grimassi himself, well... I prefer not to comment. but in this case you go under another problem: it relies too much on references to sources given by himself. You need to improve it by adding secondary or tertiary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by -kayac- (talk • contribs)

I don't know what you're talking about here. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 15:51, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm speaking about the fact that practically all the sources about Stregheria are given by Grimassi himself. In fact it is Grimassi in his books that affirms that Stregheria is an Italian belief system. But in reality it is a belief system followed by some in America. We needs to have some other reliable sources apart Grimassi. About the use of the word, you can read some good Italian dictionary and you see...---kayac- (talk) 16:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing plenty of different sources here: Stregheria#Notes. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a complicated issue; it looks like most people just call it Italian, but maybe it should be clarified here better. I recommend bringing it up on the article's talk page Talk:Stregheria. To me it doesn't seem right of you to just go ahead and call it "Italian American" in the first sentence of the article. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the article is plenty of notes, bur we have to concentrate to the sources that will prove that it is "Italian", and the only ones are Grimassi, Grimassi, Grimassi... also if you read the full article it is clear that is a tradition born by a mixing done by a second/third generation Italian Americans. So it is not original but a mixing of many elements, it is done not by the original immigrants, but by their sons and nephews... people that even do not speak Italian and that maybe have been in Italy sometimes for holiday! Excuse me, I don't want to be rude, but here in Italy there are still a lot of people laughing a lot about the pretence by Grimassi to make divination runes on the fava beans sold as "original Italian" (the runes are an alphabetic system developed in northern Europe, a system that was never used in Italy in many millennia of history) ---kayac- (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay but is there at least one reliable source that says the same thing that you're saying here? — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you can find the source in the Italian article related to Stregheria: :^[1] Lo utilizza quasi esclusivamente Girolamo Tartarotti, la cui opera a metà del XVIII secolo “si può a ben ragione considerare come il punto di arrivo del più che secolare ripensamento sulla questione della stregoneria”. Infatti il termine stregheria viene usato in questo contesto per identificare sostanzialmente il fenomeno delle streghe e la credenza nella “compagnia di Diana”, una credenza illusoria che Tartarotti considerava diffusa in tutta l’Europa. Le streghe per Tartarotti sono “vecchie libidinose e malinconiche che si eccitano ai più sudici racconti e con l’aiuto di speciali unguenti credono di vivere ciò che sognano”.

You realize this is not very helpful, right? Non-English sources are of course just as valid as English sources, but it's your responsibility to translate what it says and to demonstrate that it's a reliable source.

Please post about all of this on the article's talk page, so it's not just an endless argument between the two of us. Before you edited the article, there was an implicit consensus that what the article said was correct. That's why it's your job to provide proof and work toward attaining a new consensus. (Wikipedia:Consensus) — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 09:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know that there is a traslation in English of this source; it is on "Pagan Dawn" the official gazette of Pagan Federation; we have to find the right number, if I've found it previously I would not used the Italian one in our discussion.---kayac- (talk) 12:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Del Balzo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Del Balzo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Del Balzo (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article has improper citations. Most of the article beyond the intro is entirely unreferenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Del Balzo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, -kayac-! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Del Balzo

Hello, -kayac-. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Del Balzo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Del Balzo

Hello, -kayac-. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Del Balzo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Leland e la stregoneria italiana

[1] Leland e la stregoneria italiana

[1]