User talk:Abel Tiprasa

Welcome!

Hello, Abel Tiprasa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your new article

Dear Abel Tiprasa, Many thanks for contributing to Wikipedia with the interesting new article about Kokborok script. I believe this could be a valuable addition to the existing articles about Kokborok literature and language. However, the article as it stands will need a lot more work to be encyclopaedic, i.e. of a standard that is expected of Wikipedia articles. Allow me to give you some feedback: a) you will need to include references to proof claims that are being made. Pls add a bibliography and any further reading you have. b) the language will need to be reviewed. Articles should be written neutrally and not like an explanation or conversation with the reader. The level of English (grammar, spelling) also requires some more work. c) Pls look at the structure of the article. Maybe check the article about Hangul as example of a well-written article. I have therefore moved the article to the "draft" space where further work can be done on the article until it's ready for the main encyclopaedia. If you have any questions, pls let me know. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:14, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kokborok

You were removing one sourced content to replace it with another, which was not expected. You should've updated it like you have done now, without removing existing sourced content.
Anish Viswa 01:54, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, friend Anish viswa thank you for replying.

Abelborok 16:51, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Kokborok script for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kokborok script is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kokborok script until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidance

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, sir I feel that deleting an article is bad discission, I am not pointing you wrong but as I told you before Kokborok is still under process, and many people are contributing in it. And Kokborok Script is like a platform where many can get engage, showcasing their ideas in developing Kokborok script and people who read this article also will know how far has this gone. And I am sure one day all the Tripuri community will come to a conclusion through this article. So I request you not to delete this article from Wikipedia, and please remove it from the nomination of deletion. Abelborok 11:49, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kok Tripura

Hi, I'm Ammarpad. Abel Tiprasa, thanks for creating Kok Tripura!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references to your article. See WP:REFB

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

–Ammarpad (talk) 15:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced change

Hi Abel, You have recently changed the number of native speakers in the Kokborok article. I have reverted this change as it is not supported by the sources and you have not shared where you have retrieved this information from. If you have a reliable source, please feel free to discuss the change. Many thanks. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 16:23, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kokborok script

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

Dear Abel Tiprasa, please note that edits on topics about social groups in South Asia are under discretionary sanctions. As you know, there is currently no official agreement on a "native" script for Kokborok. Kokborok uses Bengali or Latin script. The introduction of a "native" script is a political process brought forward by certain sections of Kokborok society. There is no universal consensus on a) the introduction of a native script and b) what this script is going to be. Edits such as the one I have just reverted - are being considered WP:SOAPBOXING, which is against Wikipedia policy. You may be blocked from editing if you continue your disruptive edits. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 13:48, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Khorongma script moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khorongma script, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 09:25, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and reliability

Dear Abel Tiprasa, I appreciate your efforts about the Kokborok language. I appreciate that this is not a well-known language and help on this topic is very useful. However, as we have discussed before, Wikipedia can only have information that is factually correct, has reliable sources and is independently verifiable. Wikipedia is not a place for furthering an agenda. As you have outlined yourself in your draft Draft:Khorongma script, the ancient Kokborok script is extinct. While the spoken language of Kokborok has official status in the region, its official writing systems are Latin and Bengali. A "new" Kokborok script is being considered by some people, but this is a politically fractioned process. Therefore, I will remove your script image from the Kokborok article again as this is not by any means an official or accepted script for the language - unless you can provide evidence which I have not been able to identify.
I'd like to remind you again that articles about South Asian ethnic groups are under general sanctions as outlined above. Continued soapboxing and related activities can lead to topic bans or loss of editor rights on Wikipedia. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 08:54, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Khorongma script

Hello, Abel Tiprasa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khorongma script".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 19:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council into Autonomous administrative divisions of India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MLA Dhirendra Debbarma Page creation

Hi Abel! My name is Boyar Debbarma, Are you active these days? Can you create a biography of Dhirendra Debbarma MLA from Mandaibazar (Vidhan Sabha constituency). I think you can create it better Because you belongs from Mandwi.—Bdm166 (talk) 06:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kok Tripura

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kok Tripura, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:36, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kok Tripura

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kok Tripura requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]