User talk:Arpcpro

Thanks for creating the informative page Silvercrest SL65, but please do not reinsert that example image, which serves only the purpose of demonstrating what an image is. --Gray Porpoise 23:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding a more suitable image. --Gray Porpoise 00:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Imagem(032).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Imagem(032).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SilvercrestSL65_1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SilvercrestSL65_1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 11:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Silvercrest SL65

I have nominated Silvercrest SL65, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvercrest SL65 (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:28, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sony Universal Remote Control RM-V8T

The article Sony Universal Remote Control RM-V8T has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable product.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sony Universal Remote Control RM-V8T for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sony Universal Remote Control RM-V8T is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sony Universal Remote Control RM-V8T until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imagem(033).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Imagem(033).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imagem(034).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Imagem(034).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Imagem(035).jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Imagem(035).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Silvercrest-sl65-4000ch-fta.jpg

The file File:Silvercrest-sl65-4000ch-fta.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]