User talk:BSMIsEditing

BSMIsEditing is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi BSMIsEditing! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 14:21, Friday, April 17, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, BSMIsEditing! Thank you for your contributions. I am Naypta and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! | Naypta^✉ opened his mouth at 11:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for fighting againest Vandalism! P.S.: Did you know there's a great tool called the Twinkle for this? I strongly recommend it, if you find vandalism, you can remove it with one click, and with another click you can warn the vandal. And these are by far not all features. For info and installation click here. TheImaCow (talk) 12:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn

Greetings! I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta test my new tool, RedWarn, specifically designed for the fastest vandalism reverts in the west (yee-haw!). If you're interested, please see see the RedWarn page for installation instructions. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Ed6767 about RedWarn

Hello RedWarn tester! I hate to reitterate, but thank you so much for being willing to test RedWarn, I really appreciate it.

In the past few updates, I have added AIV (admin) reporting, a preferences panel, themes, customisation options and made many, many bug fixes and added many features based on your suggestions and feedback.

Unfortunately, recently feedback has run dry.

Even if you do not use RedWarn at the moment, or you do (tysm), I would greatly appreciate feedback of any kind. While I go round Twinkle users, sounding like that broadband salesperson in the mall that nobody ever wants to speak to, I'd like some updated feedback from recent and current users.

Any sort of feedback below would be greately appreciated!

Your first impressions when you tried RedWarn?
How have you used RedWarn as time has gone on?
Would you value customisation features, such as macros or shortcuts, such as adding your own quick revert reasons so the tool can fit your exact editing practices?
Any suggestions for how I could promote the tool to a wider audience?
Would you appreciate a more developed and thorough user guide?
Any theme suggestions?
Anything you'd like changing?
Something you've always wanted to see in an anti-vandal tool? (I might add it!)
RedWarn app?
A way to introduce Recent Changes patrol to new users to make using RedWarn or other tools less daunting?
Any bugs, gripes, or things that just really annoy you about RedWarn?

Click the button below to begin a new section on the talk page

Leave Feedback

My goal is to create the most user friendly moderation tool, and that's why I need your feedback to help make this truely the most favorable anti-vandal tool. While we will never elliminate vandalism on this site, we can get closer to fighting it quickly and easily.

Many thanks for your continued support. Ed6767 (talk) 00:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not wish to get these feedback reminders, let me know on my talk page.

Unnecessary templating

I explained each of my edit. Refrain from posting this message in future. 2402:3A80:8A3:125D:6CCD:C2F4:D4C5:59CB (talk) 15:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being gracious. Best wishes. 2402:3A80:8A3:125D:6CCD:C2F4:D4C5:59CB (talk) 15:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your deleting my edit about organic orange zests

Quote: "we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Zest (ingredient) seemed less than neutral and has been removed." Well, it says in the article I had edited that most oranges are treated with a cancerogenic fungicide. Why would you want to consider my edit as unneutral, act as an arbitrary censor and delete my edit that was just saying that in that case for making zest it is better to use organically grown oranges that don't have been treated with that kind of dangerous stuff??? That has nothing to do with safeguarding a neutral point of view. It is just your personal, unneutral opinion that poisonous food is equally good as healthy produce. Are you working for the agrobusiness / chemical lobby? That is how you keep people from contributing and keep Wikipedia an elitist club of "privileged editors". Shame on that kind of censorship! Laustro (talk) 22:52, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, it sounded like personal commentary on carcinogenic pesticides, which now that I look into it, would fit more in WP:OR or WP:SYNTH.--BSMIsEditing (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts sets out what is considered to be sockpuppetry. An IP user who registers an account and continues editing is not one of them. It's something we actively encourage. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 12:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frederick Seddon

I've got your note about the edits on the Frederick Seddon page. I hope I'm leaving this message in the right way.

I added two changes to that page, both of which you have rolled back:

1. correcting the name of the TV series from "Lady Killers" to "Ladykillers" (this is what it says on IMDB, and also in the titlecard on the screen of each episode as broadcast).

2. adding the information about the jury deliberation time (which comes from a link already cited at the bottom of the page, and which I thought could usefully be included in the article itself).

But I have no interest in getting involved in an edit war. Let your change stand, or roll it back to my updated correction and improvement. Completely up to you.

@80.6.160.147 Oops. I guess it was just because it showed up as orange on the recent changes list. Also, don't forget to use ~~~~ to sign your posts. --BSMIsEditing (talk) 09:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. You seemed to agree with my points above about those edits - yet you didn't roll back your changes, so I am confused about your intentions (i.e. whether you want those changes to stand or not). There have seen been other changes to the page since then, so if my changes are to be brought back, they'll now need to be re-entered - it's no longer a question of undoing your revert. Hope I'm signing this off in the right way. 80.6.160.147 (talk) 14:27, 26 August 2020 (UTC) @80.6.160.147 Done. --BSMIsEditing (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Z8Games

Hi, you recently reverted an edit I made to the Z8Games article.

The way the article currently stands (as you reverted back to) currently has some undeniable errors. Those are:

1. Claiming it is "an" online gaming portal to CrossFire doesn't really make sense when it's the only one available to English users, who are the ones who will be viewing the English Z8Games Wikipedia page. The game itself is also developed in its entirety by the parent company of Z8Games (Smilegate), so again, it's kind of nonsensical to use "an online gaming portal" as opposed to "the online gaming portal."

2. The "Lost Saga" Wikipedia article is hyperlinked 3 times in a row within the "Lost Saga" section of the article, however, it's not even hyperlinked the first time it's mentioned. That, to me, makes no sense whatsoever. Not only is redundant hyperlinking foolish, but if it's going to happen, the first time it's mentioned in the section should be a non-negotiable hyperlink.

3. Moving the line that explains that Lost Saga was shut down by Z8Games to the bottom of the Lost Saga section of the article makes significantly more sense. It was the latest piece of news, so why shouldn't it be in chronological order? I've never seen a single Wikipedia article that discusses the end of a thing before even explaining that thing in the first place.

4. I really don't understand how anyone could have a problem with not only mentioning the exact date that the Lost Saga game service was shut down by Z8Games, so I don't understand why you couldn't have at least left that aspect in. I can understand wanting to take away the point relating to the service still being active in other markets, since that doesn't have much to do particularly with Z8Games as much as it does with the game of Lost Saga, however I found it at least somewhat informative just so people would know that Z8Games didn't shut down the game of Lost Saga in its entirety. I would be more than okay with leaving that aspect of the line out, though.

5. The line I removed within the Lost Saga section of the article included a lot of nonsense trivia that has been outlawed within gaming articles on Wikipedia hundreds of times in the past. The line that was left in, which gives a brief explanation of the Lost Saga game, is more than adequate enough; the line mentioning the game modes and rankings isn't needed.

I have no intentions of entering an edit war with you, but I do just want you to understand why these changes were made, and I hope that you'll be open to actual discussion relating to changes that are objectively more informative, helpful, and sensical than what the article actually includes currently. I'll be happy to make a new edit if you think any of my changes in specific shouldn't be in the article, but I don't at all think it was vandalizing by any stretch and I'm kind of bothered by the fact that you said my changes "did not appear to be constructive" despite many of them being logical and necessary.

Thanks and have a great day — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prince Altoid (talk • contribs) 23:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Prince Altoid Oops, I just saw the word "an" replaced with "the" and automatically assumed it was promotional. I will revert that soon. Sorry.--BSMIsEditing (talk) 10:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montenegro 2020 polls.svg improvements

Hi, thanks for uploading graph of opinion polls conducted for the 2020 Montenegrin parliamentary election, if you could change the order of the electoral lists (parties and coalitions) in the graph legend, I think it would be better if lists were sorted by the left–right political spectrum order. Proper order would be; SDP -> URA -> DPS -> SD -> MNN -> AL -> BS -> ZBCG.

Thank you, Walter II, 16:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]

2020 election graphs

I see you have created some polling images for the state election articles for the 2020 U. S. election. It appears that the x-axis is using a day/month/year format. Since these are for U.S.-related articles, they should use a month/day/year format, or just month/year would be sufficient. (I initially thought they were incorrectly displaying only January dates, which is what I'm sure most U.S. readers would assume.) --Spiffy sperry (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiffy sperry, Oh. I was just using the default format that R accepts, but I will amend that. --BSMIsEditing (talk) 10:24, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Salvadoran legislative election

Hello, could you create a graphic for the article on the 2021 Salvadoran legislative election? AlSmith28 (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AlSmith28: Polling graph yes, the map already has been done. BSMIsEditing (talk) 18:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Polling graph yes. AlSmith28 (talk) 16:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@AlSmith28: Done. BSMIsEditing (talk) 16:44, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's very cute, thanks. AlSmith28 (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1997 Wirral South by-election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Chapman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	hi Lim1345 (talk) 02:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Salvadoran presidential election

Hello, could you create a graphic for the article on the 2019 Salvadoran presidential election?

--Please. AlSmith28 (talk) 19:30, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BSMIsEditing

Thank you for creating 2021 UK Independence Party leadership election.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2015 UK Graphs

Hello, think it might be a good idea to decrease the span on the graph. Seems quite vague right now. EnglishPoliticalPerson (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried setting the span as low as possible but the line won't budge. Sorry. BSMIsEditing (talk) 06:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have tried increasing the N number and ensuring its in Loess mode. EnglishPoliticalPerson (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meant to say 'have you tried' EnglishPoliticalPerson (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I did not mean to delete the portrait there. I'm working on a Miraheze wiki and moving some templates over from Wikipedia and must've accidentally deleted it when trying to customize them. Very sorry about that. Kellis7 20:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results of the 2011 United Kingdom Alternative Vote referendum

Hi, in this edit [1] four filenames were borked. Thanks brother. Dawnseeker2000 01:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I'll fill them when I have time. BSMIsEditing (talk) 08:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1980 Glasgow Central by-election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas McMillan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Senegal map

Many thanks for making the map for the election. One request though – could you remove the key from the map and instead add it to the caption of the infobox, as is done for articles like 2021 Ugandan general election? This would mean the map of the country would display at a larger size – at the moment the key takes up about a quarter of the width of the image. Cheers, Number 5 7 13:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Number 5 7 21:14, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]