User talk:Bluestsky99

hi, i am trying to add the standard rankings infobox to SMU's wikipedia. i noticed you have reverted it a few times. the infobox is standard for all universties' pages, please discuss on SMU talkpage before further reverts. moderator has been invited to moderate the page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.14.209.221 (talk • contribs)

I am an admin, not a moderator. That means I have the tools to block editors for disruptive behaviour etc. It does not mean I can or will moderate article content.

That said, I encourage you both to have a civil discussion on Talk:Singapore Management University, not on each others' talk pages or just in the edit comments. The purpose of an infobox is to summarise content in the prose. The screen full of rankings is certainly long enough to warrant an infobox summary, and probably some pruning as well. In particular, rankings should not be cited only to the institution claiming to be ranked at a certain level. Please consider that instead of removing an infobox, it might be worth adding to it so it includes the specialist rankings you mentioned in this edit if they can be sourced to a ranking agency. --Scott Davis ^Talk 08:08, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bluestsky99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Please stop reverting

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please stop reverting and discuss before adding back the contents. The page should be rephrased to reduce promotional writing. Seriouzscholar (talk) 11:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Management University

Hello, I'm Seriouzscholar. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to article have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.Seriouzscholar (talk) 11:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

correction needed

You started this attack and defamation and biased arbitrary deletion. I am just correcting it.

Do Not Add Back Contents

Your recent editing history at Singapore Management University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Seriouzscholar (talk) 11:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your most recent edits to the Singapore Management University article back to the most recent stable version. Because your edits have been opposed, as the editor initiating the change, you need to seek consensus for the changes at Talk:Singapore Management University. At this point, you have also exceed three reverts, so you should not revert the article again, at peril of being blocked for edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 14:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the material you added was copied directly from the school website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Seriouzscholar (talk) 13:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ^{[Username Needed]} 13:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. (talk) 16:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

[[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

==

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Your username (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. ((Optional) Insert relevant affiliations, disclosures, article drafts or diffs showing COI contributions.)

Rongyao (talk) 13:49, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Hello, Bluestsky99. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Rongyao (talk) 13:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please just stop

Please stop laying low hoping your improper edits be overlooked and restored. Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. As someone related to a specialised research-intensive University I pray that you embrace independent research and presentation of information.

Especially for the third party and advertisement tags, those were placed by administors. Rongyao (talk) 14:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not laying low. I have painstakingly explained my reasons numerous times . But you chose to bulldoze them. You seem to be the one with a conflict of interest. - bluestsky99.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Rongyao (talk) 14:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]