User talk:Bronks

This user is interested in the
Russian Revolution.

Welcome

A warm welcome to Wikipedia. I see that you've contributed to Sweden-related topics, so perhaps you might be interested in the Swedish Wikipedians' notice board. It's intended as an information hub for Wikipedians with interest in and/or knowledge of Swedish topics. It aims to keep track of ongoing debates and votes relating to Swedish articles, and as a place to list "weak spots", in order to attract the attention of someone knowledgeable in a specific area. If you find it interesting, you can add your signature at the bottom of the page and put it on your watchlist.

By the way, I've put Mijailovic, too, in his category the proper way. Note that, in addition to what R. S. Shaw says above, there is one more thing to keep in mind when you add a page to a category: in order to get the Category page sorted by last names, you should add "|Lastname, Firstname" befor the closing brackets. (I often forget it myself, and people will not blame you if you do, but there's no reason not to strive for perfection, right?) Like this:

[[Category:Swedish criminals|Mijailovic, Mijailo]]

Hope to see you around. Happy editing! / Alarm 14:07, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note to non-Swedes: The following post only contains an introduction to some Wikipedia basics. There is no discussion on specific content. However, I will translate it on request.

Hej och tack för svar! Eftersom du skriver på svenska så svarar jag på svenska. För mer allmänna hälsningar av detta slag torde det vara ok. Annars är tumregeln att om man diskuterar något väsentligt, tex allt som rör innehållet i artiklarna, så bör man hålla sig till engelska så att alla användare kan följa och delta i diskussionen. Det är också därför som vi gör detta på den svenska anslagstavlan. Vad gäller hur man svarar på meddelanden går det bra att svara både på sin egen Talk-sida (den som lämnar ett meddelande på en Talk-sida brukar välja att bevaka den) eller på avsändarens, båda varianterna förekommer.

Du behöver absolut inte känna någon jättepress att få allt du gör här helt korrekt enligt alla riktlinjer. Det finns massor med finesser och det är omöjligt att lära sig alla. Det fina med Wikipedia är ju också att förr eller senare fixas ens missar till ändå, av någon som vet hur man gör. Det finns givetvis heller inga som helst krav på aktivitet, varken i allmänhet eller för den som "skriver upp sig" på den svenska anslagstavlan. Lägg gärna till din signatur till namnlistan även om du inte planerar att vara så aktiv.

Jag ser att du inte fått något "välkomstmeddelande" - det finns en grupp som brukar lämna sådana till nyregistrerade användare. Men du kan hitta ett överst på min User Talk-sida. Där finns länkar till några användbara introduktionssidor. Eftersom jag ser att du laddat upp en hel del bilder skulle jag också rekommendera att du kikar på instruktionssidorna om Image description page och Image use policy. Det verkar som om flera av dina bilder saknar upphovsrättsinformation, och det måste man ha. Vilket är besvärligt, men nödvändigt.

Just bildbiten är jag ingen expert på (laddar inte upp bilder själv), men du är varmt välkommen att fråga på min Talk page om du undrar över något. (Använd gärna engelska om det inte känns alltför besvärligt.) Kan jag inte svara kan jag hjälpa dig att hitta någon som vet mer. Bästa hälsningar! / Alarm 23:19, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect syntax

Hello there - thanks for setting up redirects to The Man on the Roof; it might help to know that you can get them to work automatically using this syntax on the page you want to act as a redirect:

#REDIRECT [[The Man on the Roof]]

That's all you need to do; the software will take care of the rest. I hope that's useful! Loganberry (Talk) 15:05, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

LPMCOTW

Hi,

have a look at Wikipedia:Leftist Parties and Movements Collaboration of the Week. --Soman 20:17, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review?

I think your articles on Swedish socialists are very good, and I think you should consider taking a couple of them to peer review to get some input (you can still continue doing whatever you were planning to do with them while they are there), and eventually to nominate them for featured article status. What do you you think? I'd suggest beginning with Ture Nerman. Uppland 11:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the encouragement on my articles about Swedish socialists. What I’m doing with these guys is that I’m reading their autobiographies, one by one, and as I read I write new info for the wiki articles. I’m basically done with Ture Nerman, and right now I’m in the middle of Zeth Höglund’s 3 volume autobiography. After that I will read the 3 volume autobiography of Karl Kilbom and then the 2 volume autobiography of Fredrik Ström, and finally the much shorter autobiography of Anton Nilson. So these articles will grow. When I’m done with that, which of course will take a while, I have a newly published thick book on the early Swedish Communist Movement by historian Aleksander Kan, which will help fill in some stuff and maybe give a little more critical input on some of it. Bronks 14 November 2005.

Make sure you insert detailed references in the articles, as that will be expected when it comes to making them featured articles. I also don't know if you have all the books, but it is something to consider in time if you have borrowed some of them and won't have access to them later. Uppland 18:37, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dein Vandalismus in der de:Wikipedia (de:Zeth Höglund, de:Ture Nerman)

Dein Zeug wurde bereits einmal schnellgelöscht, die 1-Satz-Einträge sind schrottig und "Erweiterungen" wie "Geboren ." eher als Vandalismus anzusehen. Wenn Du dort weiter so machst, müssen wir zusehen, dass Du dort rausfliegst. Yopohari 13:46, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Meine Deutch ist nicht so gut, aber vieliecht können jemand diesen artikeln von the english wikipedia nach Deutch übersetzen..." - Für solche Bitten gibt es die de:Wikipedia:Übersetzungswünsche - Und nicht egal-was mit Interwikis als "Artikel" reintun. Das ist nun mal Vandalismus pur. Yopohari 14:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yopohari, you should be more careful about calling other people vandals when they obviously are not. Uppland 18:14, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at User talk:Jeff Fenstermacher. I'm not sure what is going on here... Uppland 20:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Red Army Song

the song you are speaking about is usually referred to by its lines: either "Красная армия всех сильней" (the red army is the strongest) or its first line "Белая армия, чёрный барон" (White Army, Black Baron). Both foreign links you mentioned talk about another piece, the instrumental "March of the Red Army" by Reinhold Glière (ru: Глиэр). Sorry, I have no time to write more at the moment. mikka (t) 20:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was not reading the swedish version carefully. It says that the norvegian text is based in the german version. Also indeed, the German text fits the melody of "the red army is the strongest", so it is quite possible that the German version is mistaken, because Gliere's rhythmic structure is quite different. I will check this later. (German version is definitely has an error: Gliere marsh was written in 1924) mikka (t) 01:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Confirmed. I downloaded the German song. Its music is "Красная армия всех сильней". I notified the German wiki: de:Diskussion:Die Arbeiter von Wien. mikka (t) 04:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Portman

Hey mate. I know that you prefer the images in the career section to the right, but I reckon it looks kind of silly, in that, text floats in between gaps and it looks kinda messy. Do you reckon we could give the other way a go for a while, see what other people think? Anyway, I updated a lot of the text in the Career section and plan to do the same for some of the other paragraphs as well. Also what do you reckon about the filmography? I think the huge table sort of detracts from the article..anyway Im rambling, I know your a regular at the NP page, I might propose some changes on the NP talk page. Anyway, think about changing the images around, get other peoples opinions and so on. Seeya. Forever young 20:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. I promise that the image in the introduction will not be touched! That image is actually really great, I think it's perfect there. Forever young 21:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Participant alert regarding Wikiproject on Advertising

The Wikiproject No Ads, created as a backlash against the Answers.com deal, has served an important function in providing a space for users to express their disagreement with the Foundation proposal. While the current controversies about userboxes raise questions about political and social advocacy on Wikipedia, there should be greater flexibility regarding advocacy about Wikipedia in the Wikipedia namespace. Reported and linked by Slashdot and other press sources as a unique and spontaneous occurence in Wikipedia history, it has apparently had some impact as, despite being scheduled to begin in January, not a peep has been heard about the trial and proposed sponsored link since the deal's controversial announcement months ago. Currently, however, there is an attempt to delete the project or move it off Wikipedia altogether. Since the Foundation has provided no additional information and has not attempted to answer the specific questions that participants in the project raised, it is unclear if the Answers.com deal has been abandoned or simply delayed. Until the situation becomes more clear, I believe the group should still have a place in the Wikipedia namespace. Sincerely, Tfine80 00:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Comintern members

Hi, I have proposed (on the talk page for the cat) a renaming. "Members" is akward - the word makes sense for Parties. Could we rename it to "Comintern people" or "Comintern activists"? Dahn 14:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bronks, I don't know which template to use. Could you help me? Dahn 15:05, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. But we might get static from admins on this one: we were not supposed to do it this way. That's why I had tried to find the template, warning, etc. Frankly, I think that red tape serves no purpose in this case, but we still may get scolded. Dahn 15:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 21% for major edits and 10% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 17:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update on French Turn and Max Shachtman

I thought you might like appreciate a quick Update on French Turn and Max Shachtman; you've recently contributed there and you might have seen that a moderation was attempted on some disputed edits made by User:Jacrosse. He agreed to the moderation but then did not take part in it. It agreed to delete some unsupported and referenced claims (basically, that Shachtman's current, far from fragementing and collapeing into cold-war social democarcym actually effected a Leninist takeover, both of US social democracy and then of US neo-conseratism. At this point Jacrosse is engaging in obvious acts of vandalism without even beginning to comment on the Talk pages. Perhaps Jacrosse will sit down to Talk, however it seems unlikely. Arbitration may be on the cards. If you can spare a little time over the next week or two, I would appreciate it if you could pop into Talk:French Turn or Talk:Max Shachtman. Your contribution has been very valuable and, of course, the danger is that all parties in this dispute get tangled up and lose our way towards improving the entries. Thanks for the help you've already given. --Duncan 17:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Astor hälsar...

Hej Bronks! WP blir ibland en trist mix av ankdamm och egotripp och i synnerhet gäller det SV:WP, som jag har upplevt det. När kraven på NPOV och "neutrala källor" - enligt tolkningen från vissa tonstarka medlemmar - innebär att yttrandefriheten upphör att gälla har jag ingen lust att bidraga längre. Jag kanske återkommer senare. Jag skall identifiera mig så att du vet vem jag är om jag byter namn! Vi hörs! Astorr ;-)

Category:Russian communists

Hi, Bronks. I've moved Category:Old Bolsheviks in here, as a sucategory, and erased all duplication within the article. I figured it is safe to call them all "Russian", since they were citizens of Imperial/Soviet Russia (a centralized state), no matter what their actual ethnicity was (which I suppose was the source of your reticence in placing all Old Bolsheviks in "Russian Communists"). I have also included Mayakovsky in "Old Bolsheviks": even though his article does not state it, I assume he joined the Bolsheviks before October. However, I might be wrong. Regards, Dahn 07:20, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image of trotsky

Hi

I can see that you a while ago uploaded a image of Trotsky (see it here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Trotsky_militant.jpg).

I need a better version (better dpi) because I need to print it. Can you help me with that?

Best regards

Jeppe Druedahl, Denmark

Druen 13:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portman Image

Well as much as people would like it to stay, its a violation of fair-use if there is a public-domain or commons image available to use. Sorry man. Cvene64 12:56, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lenin article

Thanks for your feedback! I try to make the articles as neutral as possible, presenting all the facts. These techniques were pretty much institutionalized in Russia long before the revolution; Lenin just continued the existing system. Kwertii 00:28, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

pie

There's already List of people who have been pied, please don't revive the category as it has already been through a deletion process. -O bli (Talk)^? 21:33, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yetta Barsh Shachtman

If you cannot supply good reason why she deserves a separate article, it will be tagged again for speedy deletion. I cannot promise that the next person who follows the speedy tag will be so willing to cut you slack as I was. Since there is no link to the article, not even from that for the man you allege is her husband (which oddly does not even mention that he was ever married), there is nothing to suggest that she even deserves mention anywhere on Wikipedia, much less her own article. Might I suggest you visit Clusty and do some expanding of that article before it gets retagged? HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 15:11, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Esbati, a Stockholmian!

Hi! I reverted your removal of the Stockholmians category on the article on Ali Esbati. The reason I stated in the talk page reads as such:

Ali Esbati can most definitely be categorized as a Stockholmian. Definition on the category page:

This category refers to people who were born and/or grew up in Stockholm, hence have the Swedish Capital as their hometown. The category doesn’t include people who moved to Stockholm at an adult age, or only lived in the city for a short time.

As he moved there at the age of ten, I would deem that he grew up in Stockholm. It is most definitely his hometown. Jobjörn 22:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're OK with that. Best regards, Jobjörn 22:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, maybe you're right... Bronks 10:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Yxa.blod.Keira.Knightley.JPG

Please do not remove the fairusedisputed tag without providing the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale for each use of the image, Image:Yxa.blod.Keira.Knightley.JPG, as required by the license. --Yamla 15:33, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said: "I added the source you asked for. Why did you delete it then...?"

Okay, well the image is still missing a detailed fair-use rationale for each of its uses. Given that it is a promotional photo, it may only be used to promote the movie. That makes its use in King Arthur (film) okay (so long as you add the detailed fair-use rationale) and possibly the use in Keira Knightley as well as that article specifically discusses the movie. Remember, though, that the image cannot be used simply to illustrate the person depicted. Also, every single use requires a detailed fair-use rationale. --Yamla 17:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yxa.blod.Keira.Knightley.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Yxa.blod.Keira.Knightley.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 12:20, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Social democratic newspapers

Hi, Bronks. I look to you as an authority on the matter, and this seems right up your alley. Could you please share your view about the concerns I raised on that page? Many thanks. Dahn 00:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brunkeberg Tunnel

I don't understand why people put up articles with just one sentence. I think it behooves you to write some text about who built the tunnel, why it was built, interesting history, etc. It appears that the page was created simply to show a neat photograph that you took! Its not an article, its like a factoid in the U.S.A. Today newspaper. george 12:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus on Chávez

As a recent editor on Hugo Chávez, can you review developments on Talk:Hugo Chávez and let us know which version you think we should move forward with, considering that either version we pick will need work? Thanks ! Sandy 14:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Palme.castro.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Palme.castro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

A message from kozlovesred

Comrade, do you have an email? Have you heard of the WSWS? Kozlovesred 23:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lennart Eriksson, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing!

Answered

--Yurik 19:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August Spångberg

I look forward to seeing the August Spångberg piece improve everyday. Thanks for your knowledgable edits!

I do not have the newspaper name/date for the obituary. My guess it was published either Stockholm or Charlottenberg around June 22, 1987. I think we need to add a source needed message, unless you have access to these papers and can provide a source. I was in Sweden last month but did not get off the train in Charlottenberg on our way from Oslo to Stockholm, so I did not get a chance to see if his papers were in the library. There is someone who knows August backwards and forwards regarding his political activities: Håkan Blomqvist at the Institute of Contemporary History, Södertörn University College. Have you talked with him?

Diogenes99 18:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have read Håkan Blomqvist's book about Nils Flyg, that's all I know of him... Bronks 19:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blomqvist teaches a course using Spångberg as a central figure. I emailed him some audio of Spångberg speaking. You'll have to expalin to me why his last name was Spångberg and not Augustsson. Diogenes99 02:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

68.53.97.54 01:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC) On the religion of August, when he visited my genadparents and parents in America in 1955 he recorded Christmas songs and wished everyone back home a merry Christmas. Is there a source for his religion?[reply]

Spångberg was a member of the Swedish communist party. If he had been a crhistian he would have been expelled from that party! But that doens't mean he couldn't enjoy christmas. Bronks 09:22, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. When I know enough Swedish to ead his book, perhaps I will know more and be able to write a paragraph on his major legislation. I appreciate all your tweaks and work on the Spangberg page. Diogenes99 17:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you too. I like the work you have put into it, making it a good article. Bronks 20:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mona Sahlin and FNL

Hello, I noticed that you inserted a possibly quite controversial statement in the article on Mona Sahlin. Do you have a source for that? It would be greatly appreciated. Tack på förhand, Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 11:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took it from the Swedish wiki, and you can also see it mentioned in todays Dagens Nyheter (19 january), there is nothing strange about it... And it is nothing controversial about FNL at all! Almost everyone in Sweden was against the Vietnam War, and many young people, especially socialists, joined the Swedish FNL groups. Bronks 13:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I'll cite it from DN later then. But, even though I most certainly would have joined FNL if I had been alive back in the days, I do believe it is quite controversial in some circles (i e, Timbro-aligned circles) - considering the controversy surrounding Lars Ohly being a "communist", you can't be too sure. But, it's stated in this article, so well. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 13:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good. Sure, of course many or all conservatives and rightist liberals found it wrong to support FNL... But the fact that a social democartic leader like Mona Sahlin has a background with the FNL movement it not controversial. Most of them do, propably even Göran Persson. Bronks 13:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it is cited, it's cool ;) Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 13:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

By the way, adding a protection template to an article does not actually protect the article. You must make a request through WP:RPP. -- tariqabjotu 21:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay - I don't know that much. I was just pissed about all the vandalizm Bronks 22:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Joe Hill reference in Anton Nilson article?

Hello,

I'm curious as to your source for the below paragraph regarding Hill's leadership in support of Nilson et al.

"However, after a while the public opinion sided with Anton Nilson, Algot Rosberg and Alfred Stern, and a massive campaign was launched to have them freed. Thousands of international meetings were held in their support, including 600 meetings amongst workers in the United States, organized by the I.W.W. and with Joe Hill as a leading participant."

Thanks very much. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EyeWobbleWobble (talk • contribs) 15:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hey, hey. I think you will find it in: Ture Nerman's Joe Hill - Mördare eller martyr?, but also in some of the many books about Anton Nilson. But it is all in Swedish. Bronks 16:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Kungensmoks.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kungensmoks.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leninsfinalfight.jpg

This is the wrong licence for this image, as it is not book cover.--Vaya 15:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SAP history

Hej, jag noterade att du efterlyste ett historiekapitel i SAP-artikeln. V.g. kolla in User:Soman/temp/SAP history där ett historiekapitel om SAP på engelska byggs upp. --Soman 17:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hej Hej. Ja, jag såg. Det är en schysst historieskildring över partiet på svenska. Det skulle vara bra med något liknande för engelska wiki, men kortare kanske. Bronks 18:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Framförallt kan det vara nödvändigt att på den engelska sidan inkludera lite mer förklarande kontext om svensk politik i allmänhet. --Soman 18:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish Socialists

Greetings, comrade! Thank you not only for noticing my contributions, but also for your suggestions. I will definitely translate those articles as well when I find the time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nick Kalivoda (talk • contribs) 23:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

AfD nomination of Érika Ortiz Rocasolano

An editor has nominated Érika Ortiz Rocasolano, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Érika Ortiz Rocasolano and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 22:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CB

Tja, kan du hjälpa mig att hålla koll på Calle Bildt artikeln. Användaren Slarre håller på och försöker förneka att FN var emot irakkriget samtidigt som han lägger in klara POV påståenden som att Bildt bara ville befria Irak från Saddam. Bronks 17:58, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're not all too NPOV either, I'd say. Please see Talk:Carl Bildt#POV dispute for further discussion. Also, I believe other Wikipedians would appreciate if we communicated in English when dealing with non-trivial matters - such as this. Peace! Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:21, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sabbatsbergs sjukhus

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sabbatsbergs sjukhus, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Spartaz ^Humbug! 20:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Militant

Could you please see my question at Talk:The Militant#Pathfinder, since it is about your edit? - Jmabel | Talk 17:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sällskapet

A tag has been placed on Sällskapet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HarryHenryGebel 18:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a newly formed band headed by swedens biggest rock star for the last 30 years, it is a notable band that should have an article. Bronks 18:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DDR Films

Please help complete the List of East German films it is incredibly poor all those films should be put into the table. I don't want it up for deletion. Other users incluiding myself are flling in the lists as we speak . Note that || stands for a column!! THanks ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "SPECTRE"} 13:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also the list 1961 -1989 is completely missing!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "SPECTRE"} 13:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However could you wait perhaps 10-15 minutes while the table is formatted like List of West German films THanks I don't want any edit conflicts!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" "SPECTRE"} 13:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billingen

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Billingen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 04:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Darjeeling Limited poster

Hey Bronks, thanks for the heads-up regarding the poster - I have now deleted it. I should have checked the source properly, it is not the one that I normally use for uploading film posters. Rje 14:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Protect your republic protest (Turkey)

I would welcome if you'd like to help with this article. :) -- Cat ^chi? 18:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Christer.pettersson.policephoto.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Christer.pettersson.policephoto.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Lokal _Profil 10:34, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Anti.emu.sweden.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anti.emu.sweden.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Addhoc 15:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discrimination of XX in XX

I have tried to bring out the issues you pointed out, but some have been deleted by anonymous POV pushers, possibly involved in the conflict itself. Please have a look at the article, as to prevent it degrading ethnic pov. I can not follow this front page article all day. -- Petri Krohn 08:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll see what I can do. Bronks 09:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English in photo

In the image Image:Lenin.platten (2).jpg, there is a slogan written in English on the banner in backgraound. If you know why that is, perhaps you should note the reason Faustus Tacitus 01:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The text says somthing like "Long live the Communist International" in a handfull of languadges. Bronks 11:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Folke Filbyter

Sorry for pestering your article on Folke Filbyter, but early Swedish history is in a horrible state and reading substandard articles on Swedish Wikipedia keeps me away from the place. What I am curious about and what has to be explained in the article is "which legends he appears in".--Berig 16:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One thing that puts me off with Swedish wikipedia are all the cranks who fill early historic Swedish people with assertions of "fictiveness" or the phrase "not historically confirmed". I have verified Folke Filbyter in Nationalencyklopedin and since it was written by a professional historian there was no information about his being fictive or not. This is only natural since it is impossible to know.--Berig 19:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is true. So far back in history, no one knows if the some of the stories are really true or just legends. And if you go waaaaay back they say that the God Oden was the first King of Sweden... Bronks 08:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Gylfi preceded him ;-). In the twilight zone between mythology and history that we call legend, I like everyone to make his or her own decisions about what is true or not.--Berig 11:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS, assertions about historicity or fictiveness are also in gross violation of the principle of WP:NPOV. Why? Because if you read a Marxist historian like Dick Harrison or an anti-royalist like Curt Weibull you get one picture, but if you read a nationalistic/patriotic scholar like Birger Nerman, you get a totally different picture. There is a great deal of ideology involved in the judgement that individual historicans pass on "historicity".--Berig 12:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Egede-Nissen

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Adam Egede-Nissen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.132.175.217 18:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag, because it is obvious that he had a national role and the article can be easily expanded.

Bronks--you know Norwegian--I don't. Please go do it, and do it fast, or it probably will get deleted. DGG 21:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jukka Latukka

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Jukka Latukka, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.144.52.40 23:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Storm_poster.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Storm_poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 14:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:14trotskybooks.jpg

I have tagged Image:14trotskybooks.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Fpt 16:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Totta.naslund.gammal.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Totta.naslund.gammal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to improve articles over here

The Irish Republicanism WikiProject is a collaboration of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Irish republicanism, Irish nationalism, and related organizations, peoples, and other topics.

(For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProject and the Guide to WikiProjects).

--Vintagekits 18:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:S_wollter_press.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:S_wollter_press.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 03:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Gorkin

You have created this article that is simply a redirect to a non-existant article. I have nominated it for speedy delete. Ursasapien (talk) 08:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I was a little quick on the draw. Ursasapien (talk) 08:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biographical articles

Please include references when creating new articles. 24.4.253.249 06:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Fjodorfuckyou.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Fjodorfuckyou.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 18:35, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tony Olsson

A tag has been placed on Tony Olsson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please also note that there are special guidelines regarding biographies of living persons. Material asserting that a person is a neo-nazi bank robber must be sourced, to avoid serious legal issues that can arise from unsoured claims (especially if they are false). --Cheeser1 16:54, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lenin

The anti-communists seem to have been given a free run at the Lenin article. That article is so right-wing POV its a scandal. Colin4C 20:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so tired of this... it never ends. Bronks 11:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A picture of trotsky and dobbs

Hi, i'm Black31 from the french wikipedia. I work on the trotskists communists. I see you are upload this picture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Farrell.Dobbs.Trotsky.jpg The problem is that the source is unknow, where are you catch this photo please ? i need this picture on the farell dobbs article, french version.

Bye ! --86.213.96.37 21:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Here is a link to where I found it:[1] Bronks 19:20, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help on translation of James P. Cannon

Hello,
I've seen you have contributed on this article, maybe you can help me to translate a sentence of the article. See Talk:James P. Cannon for details.
Thank you,
Ian --140.94.82.18 14:18, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Apotelogony.JPG

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Apotelogony.JPG. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:53, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Цет Хёглунд

Hi! I translated your article about Zeth Hoglung and wrote about Danish communist party on ru-wiki. ru:user:Lehtman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.231.6.115 (talk) 13:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! That is very cool! Thank you! Bronks 13:49, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Normal DZ D1-546.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Normal DZ D1-546.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 15:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AntonNilson.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AntonNilson.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Liftarn 16:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Svartanejlikan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Svartanejlikan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Långrocken

Långrocken, an article you contributed to, is being considered for deletion. You may want to participate in the deletion debate. –panda 20:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Rogercalero-oberlin.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Rogercalero-oberlin.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 02:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of My Life (Fidel Castro autobiography)

An editor has nominated My Life (Fidel Castro autobiography), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Life (Fidel Castro autobiography) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tusenbroderposter.jpg

I have tagged Image:Tusenbroderposter.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Let the right one in.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Let the right one in.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:22, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Svenskfreecuban5.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Svenskfreecuban5.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ThalmannDVD.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ThalmannDVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Swedes who died in the Spanish Civil War

An editor has nominated List of Swedes who died in the Spanish Civil War, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Swedes who died in the Spanish Civil War and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tiger295.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tiger295.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Liebknechtfilm.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Liebknechtfilm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jagarna.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jagarna.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mannen.pa.taket.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mannen.pa.taket.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 01:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MalcX,svenska.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:MalcX,svenska.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sistakontraktet29715.jpg

I have tagged Image:Sistakontraktet29715.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Måns Andersson

I have nominated Måns Andersson, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Måns Andersson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --Michael White^T·C 20:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mosleys.life.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mosleys.life.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Postenloggaswe.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Postenloggaswe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Spartacus fight.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Spartacus fight.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rosenzweig (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Apotelogony.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Apotelogony.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Att angjore en brygga.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Att angjore en brygga.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:28, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Barnes.capitalismsworlddisorder.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Barnes.capitalismsworlddisorder.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Blood.frostbite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blood.frostbite.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Brecccht.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brecccht.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Lenin-father.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Lenin-father.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Art-top (talk) 12:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Huvudsta

I have nominated Huvudsta, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huvudsta. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jim Carmel (talk) 19:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BUFF (Malmö Film Festival)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article BUFF (Malmö Film Festival), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Capitalism's World Disorder

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Capitalism's World Disorder, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NoCal100 (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Psycho4cover1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Psycho4cover1.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radio Mayakovsky

A tag has been placed on Radio Mayakovsky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Radio Mayakovsky and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Maniadis (talk) 03:45, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PROD: AxCom

Proposed deletion of AxCom

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AxCom, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Maniadis (talk) 03:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Strypistolslive.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Strypistolslive.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 01:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ImreNagyport.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ImreNagyport.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 14:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Balabanoffffffffffff.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Balabanoffffffffffff.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:59, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Balabanoffffffffffff.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Balabanoffffffffffff.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:PLP.redhammer.jpg)

You've uploaded File:PLP.redhammer.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Rocky22y.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rocky22y.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chillum 03:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lars-Eric Petersson

Proposed deletion of Lars-Eric Petersson

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lars-Eric Petersson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

(1) WP:BLP1E; (2) Content duplicates Skandia#Criticisms

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 19:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Fucked For Life

I have nominated Fucked For Life, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucked For Life. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. §hawn poo 22:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Med Reventberg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Med Reventberg, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

BLP unsourced for more than 2 years.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr.Z-man 21:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

==Proposed deletion of Darya Zabinski==

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darya Zabinski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

this article has been around for some time yet no one has shown notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Postcard Cathy (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Lukas Bonnier

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lukas Bonnier. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lukas Bonnier. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:26, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gustaf Hammarsten

A tag has been placed on Gustaf Hammarsten requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 14:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gustaf Hammarsten

I cannot find him referenced as a star, much less an actor in that movie. If he had a minor role, that is not notable enough for inclusion. I did not blindly delete this article, i did my research. I also removed your addition to the article on bruno where you added his name to the starring list. If you have any other questions, please let me know. Thanks! Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 15:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the article and the reference again. The source you cited is the ONLY reference I can find to this and potentially unreliable. As mor einformation becomes abailable i would not be opposed to re-creation but until then it is not relibale enough to be included on this project. Please refrain from re-creating the article or re-adding that to the "starring" section of the bruno film article. If he were in fact "starring" in the film, he would be referenced in many more places than a single article (i even did a google news search and several other searches and found NOTHING about it). his IMDB profiles does not mention the movie Bruno and the Bruno movie IMDB profiles does not mention his name, at all. Again, we need reliable sources and I am saying the one provided is not. If anything else comes to light let me know and I will gladly un-delete the article. Thanks! Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also note that the text of the article makes it very clear that hammarsten has not confirmed or denied anything for risk of being sued (which means that it is based on rumours of some sort). He may or may not be a co-star in the film but until we get RELIABLE information we cannot accept this. Again, if reliable information presents itself, let me know and I will evne help write the article. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 16:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations! Your image was shown on the Random picture of the day! It looked like this:

Random picture of the day

Vyacheslav Molotov, Soviet foreign affairs minister.

Image credit: Bronks (talk · contribs)

. - Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 11:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Mammoth (film) a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okey ~~

Speedy deletion nomination of William Gayley Simpson

A tag has been placed on William Gayley Simpson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Loonymonkey (talk) 22:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimir Ulas

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Vladimir Ulas. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. An unreferenced article you recently created does not comply with Wikipedia's policy regarding biographies of living people, so it has been moved into your user space: user:Bronks/Vladimir Ulas. Once reliable sources have been added, it may be moved back into the article space. If reliable sources are not added in a reasonable amount of time, the page may be deleted. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Thanks! --MZMcBride (talk) 04:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:C5 tunnelbana.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:C5 tunnelbana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammed Beck Hadjetlaché

Hello,

I've seen that you're the creator of the article about Mohammed Beck Hadjetlaché. I'm quite surprised by this article since i've got personal familial sources which contradict part pf what is stated in it. I would thus pretty much like to access your sources for this article.

Thank you by advance,

Mme Berthe (talk) 12:19, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hej! The main source I had when I created the article was a book, but it is in Swedish: Ryssligan by Svante Lundberg (2004), which is about his activities in Sweden with the murders etc. ... But I see know that the article has been changed a lot since I started it... Bronks (talk) 13:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- PS. This is what the book looks like: http://www.adlibris.com/se/product.aspx?isbn=9189116534

OK thanks,

I don't read swedish, so i haven't had the possibility to read this source. Do you know of translations of this book? I got some personal documents (in French which i could possibly try to scan & translate one of these days. (but not right know!) Talk to you soon,

Mme Berthe (talk) 13:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, this book is only in Swedish and I don't think it will be translated unfortunately. Bronks (talk) 19:16, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Bronks! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 28 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 699 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Anders Sjöholm - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Aleksander Kan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nikke Ström - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mattias Flink - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
David Batra - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Henrik Schyffert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sonja Lund - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Christer Dahl - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Henric Holmberg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Barbro Oborg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Rolf Holmgren 12. Yvonne Schaloske 13. Anna-Greta Leijon 14. Norbert Kröcher 15. Jonas Bonnier 16. Tommy Möller 17. Holger Juul Hansen 18. Erik Wijk 19. Mikael Strandberg 20. Aloma Wright 21. Tomás Diez Acosta 22. Eva Björklund 23. Piero Gleijeses 24. Jorge Payret 25. Fernando Martínez Heredia 26. Anders Ferm 27. Christer Gardell 28. Gunnar Gunnarson

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gösta "Snoddas" Nordgren

A tag has been placed on Gösta "Snoddas" Nordgren requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 11:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gösta "Snoddas" Nordgren

Please find references for this and demonstrate how the gentleman is notable. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 11:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Pushkin.Riga.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pushkin.Riga.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Articles for deletion nomination of Tommy Möller

I have nominated Tommy Möller, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Möller. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unit Anode 18:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Tommy Möller

I have nominated Tommy Möller, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tommy Möller. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Unit Anode 18:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Resmine Atis

A tag has been placed on Resmine Atis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Steamroller Assault (talk) 07:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Norbert Kröcher

The article Norbert Kröcher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, negative biography of a living person. Please do not remove this prod tag without sourcing the article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 19:36, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Coca Cola Cowboys

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Coca Cola Cowboys. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coca Cola Cowboys. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christer Boustedt

The article Christer Boustedt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced biography of non-notable individual.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Claritas (talk) 15:22, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gunnar Gunnarson

The article Gunnar Gunnarson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable - does not meet WP:ACADEMIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Claritas (talk) 20:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Che.Guerrilla.Warfare.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Che.Guerrilla.Warfare.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Fredstrom.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fredstrom.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Karl kilbom.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Karl kilbom.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tnerman 1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tnerman 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ernst.hugo.riket.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ernst.hugo.riket.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 07:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Ebbagron.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ebbagron.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ture zeth per.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ture zeth per.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Ture zeth per.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ture zeth per.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Turenermanpass.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Turenermanpass.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:K kilbom.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:K kilbom.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:28, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ryyykovvv.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Ryyykovvv.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst Thälmann (film)

I removed the image you uploaded and replaced it with one from the commons. I apologize for not consulting with you, but it seem you haven't been to wikipedia for a long while and I can't know when you'll read this. Bahavd Gita (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThalmannDVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThalmannDVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RedEye05.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RedEye05.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vinter2005 124.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vinter2005 124.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Samizdat.pathfinder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Samizdat.pathfinder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 21:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Themilitant.red.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Themilitant.red.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swedish Forn Sed Assembly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swedish Forn Sed Assembly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swedish Forn Sed Assembly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Solstickan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Solstickan.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:40, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Univermarx.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Univermarx.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 11:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Woods.marxism.U.S.A.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Woods.marxism.U.S.A.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:SvenNykvist.ljusbok.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SvenNykvist.ljusbok.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BUFF (Malmö Film Festival) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BUFF (Malmö Film Festival) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BUFF (Malmö Film Festival) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andrei S (talk) 11:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Welcometosweden.mayday.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Welcometosweden.mayday.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Bronks}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:31, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karin Smirnov

The article Karin Smirnov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of independent notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 11:45, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Felix and Cannon

Felix Morrow's daughter is curious where the photo of Morrow and Cannon came from (you placed in Morrow's piece in 2006). No worries, she's just curious. You can email me off list if you wish MutantPop@aol.com or hit me up on my talk page. Ciao. —Tim Davenport/// Carrite (talk) 19:12, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:34, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ottogrimlund.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ottogrimlund.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Nomination of Joel Britton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Britton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Britton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Boogerpatrol (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Abf-bralogo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Abf-bralogo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 03:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Regina Lund

On 16 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Regina Lund, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Swedish singer Regina Lund had a part in Once in a Lifetime, a comedy film about the Eurovision Song Contest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Regina Lund. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ture ner man ung.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ture ner man ung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ryss lindh zeth kollontay.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ryss lindh zeth kollontay.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ottogrimlund.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ottogrimlund.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Texas.kata.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Texas.kata.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Farrell.Dobbs.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Farrell.Dobbs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Farrell.Dobbs.Trotsky.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Farrell.Dobbs.Trotsky.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Farrell.Dobbs.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Farrell.Dobbs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Farrell.Dobbs.Trotsky.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Farrell.Dobbs.Trotsky.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gymn listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gymn. Since you had some involvement with the Gymn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 06:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Landler.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Landler.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kamenyev.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kamenyev.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NKVD1936.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NKVD1936.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ska 018.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ska 018.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Szamuely.lenin.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Szamuely.lenin.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Trotsky militant.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trotsky militant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Szamuely.lenin.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Szamuely.lenin.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trots allt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trots allt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dimitrovmoskva.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dimitrovmoskva.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fucked For Life for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fucked For Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fucked For Life (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hermann Greulich

The article Hermann Greulich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no references and lacks notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BSOleader (talk) 14:38, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:NKVD1936.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:NKVD1936.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Fabianstaty.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fabianstaty.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 16:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Apotelogony.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apotelogony.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alex Buchman

The article Alex Buchman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article fails to meet the criteria for basic notability. The subject is worked for a famous person but received no widespread recognition himself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —jameslucas ^{▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄} 18:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dark Walker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark Walker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Walker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Just Chilling (talk) 16:29, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jogiches.jpg

The file File:Jogiches.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eastmaninstitutet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eastmaninstitutet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastmaninstitutet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Koridas 📣 22:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death of a Prophet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death of a Prophet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death of a Prophet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 16:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Themilitant.red.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Themilitant.red.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Kerry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Kerry, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Kerry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mylife.pathfinder.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mylife.pathfinder.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bert Cochran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bert Cochran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Cochran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sal2100 (talk) 19:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fredrikstrom.ung.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:11, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rodstjarnaoverkina.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rodstjarnaoverkina.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Per Eggers

The article Per Eggers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This one sentence biography article has zero citations to establish notability. The one External link is to IMDb that describes the actors accomplishments, but no indepth content about the actor. After searching, unable to find sources to provide sufficient coverage. Created on 21 November 2005.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]