User talk:Caelus sv

Welcome!

Hello, Caelus sv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) /Caelus sv (talk) 19:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi, I noticed your edit at Julian Assange. Per WP:OVERLINK, we do not link to commonly used words, so I removed most of the links you added. Let me know if you need any more help. --John (talk) 20:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish political party colors

I hope you won't revert my edits as you did with User:Dodödod, as they are based on party-published material rather than amateur approximiation. --hydrox (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm, this issue has been discussed several times already. The main point of using colors in infoboxes and tables is to create overlook and make it easier for readers to separate different parties from each other. The official colors of many parties, for example the Moderate Party and the Liberal Party as well as the Centre Party and the Green Party, are almost identical to each other which makes that very difficult. That's why almost all media and newspapers, as well as the Swedish Election Authority, don't use the official party colors in their graphics. Since these templates are used in many articles it would also be good if you could at least put up the issue on the talk page before making these radical changes. /Caelus sv (talk) 23:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With the ones that I modified the replaced color was approximately of the same shade as the party's official color, but I do admit that the officialization has brought some of them closer together. But at least, we should avoid boilerplate colors such as #f00. I also noticed how The Alliacne's color is officially oragne/brown, but everyone seems to use blue, and replacing it would have the consequences of most people not recognizing the color (I assume). Could you please point me to a previous conversations about this issue, if any? --hydrox (talk) 19:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See for example here and here at Swedish Wikipedia. I think that we should try and use the same colors here at English Wikipedia for consistency. /Caelus sv (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Though I really can't read that complicated Swedish. --hydrox (talk) 23:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out

You are invited to join the discussion at sv:Malldiskussion:Partifärg. hydrox (talk) 14:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

My main concern was to ask for your input if this, for example, a really bad idea. I can see now, for example, that there are some diagram legends where these values are transcluded in their legend, so changing them is actually practically impossible without ramifications. Is this perhaps why you haven't said anything yet?:) --hydrox (talk) 09:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not replying yet, I've been quite busy with IRL the last days. I will try to reply as soon as possible. /Caelus sv (talk) 10:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit, I've now replied at the Swedish Wikipedia. /Caelus sv (talk) 19:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, and sorry for hurrying you there but not being able to answer myself as promptly. I will try write an answer ASAP. --hydrox (talk) 01:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Finally got around to writing a reply. I think we'll have to settle with the situation for now. I would suggest changing the M color even in SV-wiki as the materials that you kindly looked up seem to suggest lighter shade of blue for M, but will not personally do so because I cant understand Swedish. --hydrox (talk) 00:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Swedish general election, 2010

Hej Caelus sv! Would you please look in at Swedish general election, 2010, especially recent events at its talk page. (You made constructive comments a month ago, and other editors have noted that the article could be gainfully leavened with new editors!) Tack! Mvh, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 22:02, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of countries by antidepressant consumption) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of countries by antidepressant consumption.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 11:49, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren: Thank you! /Caelus sv (talk) 12:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Swedish political officeholders table start

Template:Swedish political officeholders table start has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Swedish cabinet table end/test

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Swedish cabinet table end/test, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MClay1 (talk) 14:45, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]